Zone and
Schedule
Objectives*
Clause 54 and 55
Requirements
Max.
Building
Height
Application Requirements
Decision Guidelines
Where new building bulk
visually impacts on adjoining
dwellings, a landscaped
vertical screen should be
provided.
A17 & B28:
An area of
40sqm, with one part of the
private open space to
consist of secluded private
open space with a minimum
area of 25sqm and a
minimum dimension of 4m.
Secluded private open
space should not be located
in the front setback of a
dwelling or residential
building and should have
convenient access from a
living room.
neighbourhood and site description (NSD)
plan and should include a written
evaluation of how the features of the
neighbourhood identified in the NSD
influence the design.
Demonstrate that on site water storage and
detention has been considered in the design,
where necessary.
*Different zones allow for different types of objectives. MUZ schedules allow for ‘Objectives’, the RGZ allows for specification of ‘Design Objectives’, the GRZ and the
NRZ allow for specification of ‘Neighbourhood Character Objectives’. For the purposes of this table, the term ‘Objectives’ is used to apply to all.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
601 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.3 Analysis of Mixed Use Zone
Location
Observed uses
Indicative image
Victoria Cr, St Albans
DDO9: Preference for 4 storey residential
development; and 3 storey street wall height
with 0m street setback.
Applies to a range of allied
professional offices (e.g.,
pathology, optometrists) in
former dwellings and similar
buildings, generally with
onsite carparking.
St Albans Rd, Sunshine North
Applies to a future residential
townhouse development site.
Expected include residential,
commercial, and retail uses
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
602 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Location
Observed uses
Indicative image
Fitzgerald Rd, Sunshine West
Applies to a commercial
shopping centre, occupied by
a supermarket and other
retail and hospitality services.
Onsite carparking is
provided.
Palmer Pde, Derrimut
Applies to a dual subdivision.
Existing use is a primary
school fronting Capesthorne
Dr, with the balance of the
land unutilised. Onsite
parking is provided.
Street view from undeveloped lot at Palmer Pde (above), and primary school
at Capesthorne Dr (below).
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
603 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Location
Observed uses
Indicative image
Furlong Rd, Cairnlea
High-density residential use
with ground level retail and
commercial. Carpark
provision is internal.
Martin St, Sunshine
Applies to a carpark
associated with the Salvation
Army adjacent to the lot. A
community garden is also
present.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
604 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Location
Observed uses
Indicative image
Albert Cr, St Albans
DDO9: Preference for 4 storey residential
development; and 3 storey street wall height
with 0m street setback.
Applies to several residential
uses characterised by
detached and unit dwellings.
Crossovers provide resident
carparking whilst existing
carparking space in Mitchell
St abuts the MUZ.
Collins St, St Albans
Existing uses are low density
residential characterised by
detached dwellings, and a
pre-school. MUZ lots are
flanked by carparking (11
and 17 Collins St) associated
with the adjacent commercial
centre.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
605 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Location
Observed uses
Indicative image
DDO9: Preference for 4 storey residential
development; and 2 storey street wall height
with variable street setback.
Calder Fwy, Taylors Lakes
Melbourne Airport Environs Overlay
(Schedule 1): More than one dwelling per lot
is prohibited. Permit required to construct a
single dwelling regardless of lot size (i.e.,
above or below 300sqm).
Applies to 69,000sqm of
undeveloped land with a
704m frontage to Calder
Freeway. Adjacent to Taylors
Lake Estate that is
characterised by
conventional density and
residential land uses.
7.4 Summary of Overlays
Overlay
Where applied in Brimbank
The overlay’s influence on housing
Environmental Significance Overlay
(ESO)
Applied significant grasslands (ESO1,
ESO3, ESO6), areas of
geomorphological significance (ESO2)
and the Kororoit Creek Corridor (ESO4)
and Maribyrnong River Valley (ESO5).
Used to identify areas where development may be affected by environmental
constraints.
Generally, grassland ESOs don’t impact on housing as they don’t apply to residential
land. The Australian Broadcast Site (zoned SUZ2) however, may have residential
potential. Flora and fauna impacts would need to be resolved for this site, as well as
impacts on the volcanic eruption points (ESO2).
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
606 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Overlay
Where applied in Brimbank
The overlay’s influence on housing
ESO5 and ESO4 affect or abut some residential land. Objectives and guidelines are
included to ensure development is not visually prominent or intrusive when viewed from
the creek/river corridor.
It is noted however, that the ESO is technically only applicable where it affects
residential land (a very small area), not abutting land. However, the significance of
these features should be considered by the development of adjoining land.
Significant Landscape Overlay
(SLO)
Applied to the mature canopy trees
along Old Calder Highway between
Green Gully Road and the Maribyrnong
River (SLO1), to the Sunshine Municipal
Office Garden area at Wilkinson Street
and Alexandra Avenue (SLO2) and to
the Maribyrnong River (SLO3).
Used to identify and conserve and enhance the character of significant landscapes.
Generally, the SLOs do not apply to residential land. The significance of the abutting
landscapes, however, should be considered by the development on adjoining land.
Heritage Overlay
(HO)
Applied to several sites throughout the
municipality, including residential areas.
Used to conserve and enhance heritage places, and those elements which contribute
to the significance of heritage places.
The Overlay triggers permits for demolition and alterations (especially external) of
housing.
Further details are provided in the Neighbourhood Character Influences chapter.
Design and Development Overlay
(DDO)
Applied to activity centres and precincts,
including St Albans Activity Centre
(DDO9), Keilor Village Activity Centre
(DDO10), Sunshine Hospital Medical
Services Precinct (DDO8), Brooklyn
Industrial and Commercial Precinct
(DD11), and an area in Sunshine
(DDO7). Also applied to various areas
impacted by the Western Ring Road
(DDO4, DDO6) and areas to be
protected from visual intrusion, including
along the Maribyrnong River (DDO1)
and Taylors Creek (DDO5).
Used to identify area that are affected by specific requirements relating to the design
and built form of new developments.
Development should respond to the stated objectives in the relevant DDO, and any
other requirements specified.
The DDOs apply to a mix of land uses, including some residential land, and can have a
strong influence on the character of new development.
Further details of each DDO are provided in the Neighbourhood Character Influences
chapter.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
607 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Overlay
Where applied in Brimbank
The overlay’s influence on housing
Development Plan Overlay
(DPO)
Applied to large and small
redevelopment sites throughout the
municipality (including residential and
non-residential zoned sites), and
notably the Plenty Valley Estate
(DPO3), the Cairnlea Estate (DPO6),
Cairnlea Mixed Use Precinct (DPO4)
and Orica Deer Park (DPO16).
A full list of DPOs is provided in the
Neighbourhood Character Influences
section.
Used to identify areas where the form and conditions of future use and development is
to be shown on a development plan.
Requirement for plans incorporating residential development vary depending on the
site, context, and development expectations.
Further details are provided in the Neighbourhood Character Influences chapter.
Land Subject to Inundation Overlay
(LSIO)
Applied to areas bordering the
Maribyrnong River, Taylors Creek,
Kororoit Creek and other small scale
waterways, with residential zoned land
abutting the waterways affected.
Used to identify flood prone land affected by the 1 in 100 year flood, and to ensure
that development maintains or improves the waterway protection and floodplain
health. In Brimbank, the schedule has not been used to specify any additional
objectives or requirements.
Where the overlay affects residentially zoned land, a permit is required for many types
of buildings and works, to enable an assessment of the potential impacts of flooding,
measures required to floodproof development, to mitigate risk and to protect the
waterway.
Special Building Overlay
(SBO)
Applied to residential areas at risk of
flooding from urban drainage in
Sydenham, Taylors Lakes, Keilor, St
Albans, Deer Park, Sunshine, and
Sunshine West.
Used to identify land liable to inundation by overland flows from the urban drainage
system, and to ensure free passage of flood waters and protection of waterways. In
Brimbank, the schedule has not been used to specify any additional objectives or
requirements.
The overlay triggers a permit for many types of buildings and works to enable an
assessment of the susceptibility of the development to flooding and the effect of
development on floodwaters, stormwater, and drainage water.
Public Acquisition Overlay
(PAO)
Applied to land along major transport
corridors, including Calder Freeway and
Calder Park Drive, Airport Drive,
Western Ring Road, and scattered
parcels in activity centres.
Used to identify land which is proposed to be acquired for a public purpose.
The development potential of this land is limited, pending acquisition.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
608 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Overlay
Where applied in Brimbank
The overlay’s influence on housing
Development Contributions Plan Overlay
(DPCO)
DCPO1 applied to most of the Sunshine
MeAC. DCPO2 applied to the remainder
of the municipality.
Used to identify areas where a contribution will be levied for the provisions of works,
services, and facilities.
DCPO2 applies to all new development in Brimbank (outside the Sunshine Mae which
is subject to its own DCP) to fund community facilities, path, and roads. The levy
payable varies by charge area (suburb).
Melbourne Airport Environs Overlay
(MAEO)
Applied to a portion of Sydenham Park
south of the border with Hume and a
significant portion of Keilor Downs to
Sunshine North. MAEO1 is applied to
the area closer to Melbourne Airport and
MAEO2 affects an area that extends
further south.
Used to identify land that may be impacted by aircraft noise associated with the
Melbourne Airport, and to ensure land use and development is compatible with the
operation of the airport and that dwellings incorporate appropriate noise attenuation
measures.
MAEO1 limits the number of dwellings on a lot to 1 and restricts subdivision that would
increase the number of dwellings.
MAEO2 restricts dwellings to a maximum of one per 300 square meters.
Neighbourhood Character Overlay (NCO)
Not currently used in Brimbank but
relevant to consider
Applicable to specific areas where variations to Clause 54 and 55 standards fail to
meet the specific objectives for neighbourhood character, and as such, locally tailored
controls are required.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
609 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.5 Strategic Redevelopment Sites (from
Home and Housed
) (images sourced from Near Map).
Site (identified using the ret dot)
Zoning and
Overlays
Development Status
Robertsons Road, Taylors Lakes
Zones:
GRZ1
Overlays:
DCPO2, DPO17
As of July 2022:
Partially developed.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
610 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Site (identified using the ret dot)
Zoning and
Overlays
Development Status
St Albans Road, Sunshine North
Zones:
GRZ1 and MUZ
(dual subdivision)
Overlays:
DCPO2, DPO15,
EAO, HO149
Other:
Aboriginal Cultural
Heritage
Note the site is
located within the
Albion Quarter
Precinct that is to
be prepared in the
coming years
As of September 2022:
Display home has been delivered for the purpose of advertising
the future residential estate. Does not appear to have
commenced. e.
Ballarat Road/Western Highway, Albion
Zones:
IN1Z
Overlays:
DCPO2, EAO
Other:
Aboriginal Cultural
Heritage
Note the site is
located within the
Albion Quarter PSP
that is to be
As of September 2022:
No signs of
redevelopment
occurring. The site is
industrial with an
associated carpark. It is
noted extent of existing
industrial use extends
beyond lot cadastre and
designated strategic
development site
boundary.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
611 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Site (identified using the ret dot)
Zoning and
Overlays
Development Status
prepared in the
coming years.
Taylors Road, Delahey
Zones:
SUZ1 and TRZ2
Overlays:
DCPO2, EAO,
ESO1, ESO2
As of September 2022:
Development has not occurred.
Margrave Street, St Albans
Zones:
GRZ1, UFZ
Overlays:
DCPO2, DPO9,
EAO, SBO
As of September 2022:
Construction has not commenced.
However, a disused building has been
demolished and removed from the site.
The carpark associated with the now
demolished building has also been
removed. An internal road link
connecting from Margrave St to the
south of the site has been removed
whilst the extension of Regan St into
the site from the north remains.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
612 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Site (identified using the ret dot)
Zoning and
Overlays
Development Status
Copernicus Way/Fisken Way, Keilor Downs
Zones:
C1Z
Overlays:
DCPO2, DPO2,
SBO
As of September 2022:
Dwellings at the north-western portion of the
site. . No signs of development occurring
elsewhere. Balance of the land is yet to be
developed and is used as public open
space with a slight grade/incline and is
accessible from residential streets and the
adjacent commercial centre.
St Albans Road, St Albans
Zones:
IN3Z
Overlays:
DCPO2, DDO9
As of September 2022:
No signs of redevelopment
occurring. Site continues to be
used for the purpose of a
hospitality venue (St Albans Hotel)
and associated car park;
recreational venue (St Albans
Bingo Centre); and a commercial
site (Global Nail Beauty Supplies)
and associated carpark. It is noted
that internal road upgrades were
delivered to St Albans Hotel’s
carpark in late-2018 which may
suggest interest in continuing the
existing land use.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
613 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.6 Definitions of Neighbourhood Character Features in Brimbank
Front setbacks
A front setback is the distance between the front property boundary and the front wall of a building. For this Project, front setbacks have been categorised as minimal, moderate,
or generous.
Minimal setback
– Dwelling is set back approximately 0m–4m from the front property line. Setback distance limits space for landscaping.
Figure 1: Minimal front setback examples
Moderate setback
– Dwelling is set back approximately 4m–8m from the front property line. Setback distance allows some space for landscaping.
Figure 2: Moderate front setback examples
Generous setback
– Dwelling is set back approximately 8m or greater from the front property line. Setback distance allows ample space for landscaping.
Figure 3: Generous front setback examples
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
614 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Side setbacks
A side setback is the distance between the side property boundary and the righthand or lefthand edge of a dwelling or building. Side setbacks have been categorised as ‘no side
setback’ (absent), minimal, moderate, or generous.
No side setback
– Dwelling is constructed to the side boundary.
Figure 4: No side setback examples
Minimal side setback
– Dwelling is set back approximately 0m–2m from the side boundary. Setback distance limits space for landscaping to narrow strips and provides limited
space for utilities. There is insufficient space for vehicles to park at the side of the dwelling.
Figure 5: Minimal side setback examples
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
615 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Moderate side setback
– Dwelling is set back approximately 2m–5m from the side boundary. Setback distance allows some space for landscaping and utilities.
Figure 6: Moderate side setback examples
Generous side setback
– Dwelling is setback approximately 5m or greater from the side boundary. Setback distance allows ample space for landscaping, utilities, carports
and/or vehicle parking.
Figure 7: Generous side setback examples
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
616 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Fencing
Low fencing creates a sense of openness and provides opportunities for passive surveillance. High fencing gives residents a greater degree of privacy, but it can make a
neighbourhood feel uninviting and closed in. This Project categorises fencing in Brimbank as low, medium, or high.
Low fencing
– Below knee level (less than 1m in height).
Figure 8: Low fencing examples
Medium fencing
– Hip to below eye level (approximately 1m–1.7m in height).
Figure 9: Medium fencing examples
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
617 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
High fencing
– Above eye level/head height (approximately 1.7m or greater in height).
Figure 10: High fencing examples
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
618 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Fencing Permeability
Fencing permeability is the degree to which a person can see through fencing to the other side. This Project describes fencing permeability as being of low permeability,
moderate permeability or permeable.
Low permeability
– Substantial obstruction of view lines to the property from the street. Fencing typically does not include gaps between fence materials.
Figure 11: Low permeability examples
Moderate permeability
– Some obstruction of view lines to the property from the street. Fencing typically includes continuous vertical or horizontal gaps between fence materials.
Figure 12: Moderate permeability examples
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
619 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Permeable
– Large gaps in fencing material results in no obstruction to view lines to the property from the street.
Figure 13: Permeable examples
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
620 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Landscaping
Landscaping includes trees, shrubs/bushes, flowing plants, grass or lawn and other plantings within the private ream and public realm. Front, side, and rear landscaping is
described as:
Minimal landscaping
– Low level plantings, limited species variation and/or no canopy tree.
Figure 14: Minimal landscaping examples
Moderate landscaping
– Varied amounts and volume of plantings, some species variation with lawn and often a canopy tree.
Figure 15: Moderate landscaping examples
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
621 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Generous landscaping
– High amounts and volume of plantings, species variation possibly with lawn or alternative treatment, and two or more canopy trees.
Figure 16: Generous landscaping examples
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
622 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Housing Age
Housing age refers to whether the housing is reflective of the original housing of the suburb’s era of development, or whether it is newer development. Housing age is
categorised as traditional, contemporary, or contemporary infill development.
Traditional
– Original housing stock of the suburb or locality.
Note: Heritage dwellings are acknowledged as traditional housing.
Figure 17: Traditional housing stock examples in (left to right) Sunshine, Sunshine West, and Kings Park
Contemporary
– New housing development that has replaced traditional housing stock in older suburbs, or has been recently developed in newer suburbs (e.g., Cairnlea, Taylors Lakes,
and Derrimut).
Figure 18: Contemporary housing stock examples in (left to right) Keilor Park, St Albans, and Sunshine
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
623 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Figure 19: Contemporary housing stock examples (left to right) Cairnlea, Taylors Lakes, and Derrimut
Contemporary Infill Development
– New housing that is developed on vacant land or has replaced other housing or development. Infill development typically involves an increase in
residential density or intensification.
Figure 20: Infill development examples in (left to right) Sydenham, Sunshine, St Albans
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
624 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Material Quality
Material quality
refers to the level of integrity and longevity of building materials used in dwelling construction. Material quality considers the susceptibility of the
material/construction to defects such as water damage and sun damage.
Figure 21: Example of poor-quality, water damaged material (left) and higher quality material (right)
Lot sizes
Lot size impacts the possible scale and form of development and determines the garden area requirement in the NRZ and GRZ. . In this Project, lot sizes are categorised as:
Very small lot size
– Lots less than 300sqm.
Small lot size
– Lots 300–500sqm.
Moderate lot size
– Lots 500–800sqm.
Large lot size
– Lots 800–2000sqm or greater.
Very large lot size
– Lots greater than 2000sqm.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
625 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.7 Analysis of DPOS
DPO
Name of area
Zones
within
the DPO
Status
DPO2
Keilor Downs Plaza
Shopping Centre
C1Z
Partially developed. A development plan has been approved, to support a mixed-use development including a
sizeable residential component.
DPO3
River Valley Estate
Primarily
GRZ1,
with
some
C1Z,
NRZ2
and
PPRZ
Being developed in stages, in accordance with the approved 2002 Development Plan. Comprises a mixture of single
dwellings and townhouses, with permits issued for apartment style development. Dwellings in the estate tend to have
a higher site coverage than the dwellings in the neighbouring Sunshine North.
DPO4
26S Glenbrook Avenue and
147A Cairnlea Drive,
Cairnlea
Primarily
GRZ2,
with
portions
of C2Z,
PUZ7
and
PPRZ
Applies to the final stage of the Cairnlea development. It is subject to a Planning Scheme Amendment request, which
seeks to remove the DPO4 and apply the Comprehensive Development Zone – Schedule 3 (CDZ3). The Government
Land Standing Advisory Committee ran a 12-day Public Hearing in June 2022 to consider the Amendment and will
prepare a report for the Minister for Planning to consider.
DDPO5
Land at the north west
corner of Kings Road and
Taylors Road, Delahey
C1Z
Delahey Village Neighbourhood Activity Centre. No residential component in the approved Development Plan.
DPO6
Cairnlea Estate – Former
Albion Explosives Factory
Site
Primarily
NRZ1,
with
some
RGZ1,
GRZ1,
MUZ,
C1Z,
PUZ2,
PPRZ
and
PCRZ
Guided the development of Cairnlea Estate, a large, primarily residential development on the site of the former
Albion Explosives Factory. Its features include: a variety of housing typologies (including apartments, townhouses,
and detached dwellings), a landscape response that incorporates natural features of the subdivision layout, and
consistent front setbacks.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
626 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
DPO
Name of area
Zones
within
the DPO
Status
DPO7
10 McKechnie Street, St
Albans
RGZ1
Guided the development of the new St. A estate. St. A is a 6.5 hectare masterplanned estate that consists of 254
townhouses of various types. Contained within the site is 3,200m
2
of central public open space and a series of
pocket parks.
DPO8
110V and 112-116
Anderson Road, Sunshine
Primarily
GRZ1
with
some
MUZ
Permit issued, but development not commenced. The Development Plan approved provides for 30 dwellings with a
mix of 2, 3 and 4 bedrooms and adheres to requirements relating to building height, setbacks, landscaping and
pedestrian access to H.V. McKay Memorial Gardens and the nearby heritage footbridge.
DPO9
51 & 63A Regan Street, St
Albans
GRZ1
and UFZ
Development Plan has not been prepared. The DPO requires a range of lot sizes, densities, and typologies to
achieve at least 200 dwellings on the site; public open space; and ESD initiatives.
DPO13
Sunshine Golf Course (130
Fitzgerald Street) and the
Masonic Centre (1A Ralph
Street), Sunshine West
GRZ1
and
NRZ1
Influenced various neighbourhood character features, particularly building heights and setbacks. Specific setback
distances required by DPO13 successfully integrate newer development with traditional housing stock in surrounding
areas by reducing visual bulk and providing separation between dwellings.
DPO14
South West Industrial Park
IN1Z and
PUZ1
Not residential.
DPO15
Former City West Water
Site (247-251 St Albans
Road, Sunshine North)
GRZ1
and MUZ
Development plan approved and permit issued for development.
DPO16
Orica Deer Park
Development Plan
C2Z
Not residential. No approved development plans.
DPO17
95 Station Road and 814
Ballarat Road, Deer Park;
27 Driscolls Road, Kealba;
32A Green Gully Road,
Keilor; 18-24 Robertsons
Road and 16-28 McCubbin
Drive, Taylor Lakes
RGZ1
and
PUZ2;
GRZ1;
NRZ1;
GRZ1
Development plan approved and permits issued. Discussed below.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
627 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.8 Analysis of DDOs
DDO
Name of area
Zones
within the
DDO
Status
DDO1
Skyline areas
GRZ1,
NRZ2, PPRZ
Covers skyline areas along the Maribyrnong River in Sunshine North. Seeks to protect areas along the river frontage
from visual intrusion by residential development. Despite this, development associated with the River Valley Estate (refer
DDO3 discussion) is visually prominent.
DDO4
Lots 6 & 7,
Fitzgerald Road,
Sunshine West,
adjacent to the
Western Ring Road
NRZ1
Applies to land in Sunshine West adjacent to the Western Ring Road. Seeks to ensure that development incorporates
noise attenuation measures to minimise traffic noise impacts. The area has been developed with detached dwellings,
although a few lots remain vacant. Contains Sirius College – Sunshine, Ibrahim Dellal Campus). Proposed parcel at the
northern end.
DDO5
Land located
between Taylors
Creek and
properties fronting
Patterson Avenue &
Campaspe Crescent
NRZ1
Developed with detached housing. Applies to approximately 30 lots adjoining Taylors Creek in Keilor. Seeks to limit
visual intrusion caused by inappropriate development. Design objectives encourage single storey development with
pitched roofs, to protect the skyline when viewed from Taylors Creek.
DDO6
Land adjoining
McIntyre Road
between Western
Highway and the
Western Ring Road,
North Sunshine
GRZ1, IN1Z,
C1Z
Applies to commercial, residential, and industrial areas adjoining McIntyre Road between the Western Highway and the
Western Ring Road in Sunshine North. Seeks to provide for high quality, contemporary design and minimise traffic
conflicts between local residential traffic and through traffic.
DDO7
Land located at 79
Wright Street
Sunshine
Primarily
NRZ1, with
some PPRZ
Applies to 79 Wright Street, Sunshine, adjoining Kororoit Creek. Supports a site responsive design that enhances
neighbourhood character and the environmental values of Kororoit Creek.
Design objectives have been generally implemented. Dwellings are separated from traditional dwelling stock along the
western boundary and set back from Kororoit Creek.
DDO8
Sunshine Hospital
Medical Services
Precinct
RGZ1,
GRZ1, SUZ1
Applies to the Sunshine Hospital Medical Services Precinct. Establishes a preferred character of 3 storeys for Furlong
Road and Majorca Street and 1 to 2 stores along St Albans Road/St Albans South. Existing residential character is
single storey detached housing.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
628 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
DDO
Name of area
Zones
within the
DDO
Status
DDO9
St Albans Activity
Centre
Mostly
RGZ1, with
some GRZ1,
C1Z, MUZ,
IN3Z, PPRZ,
PUZ2 and
PUZ6
Applies to the St Albans Major Activity Centre, which is currently developed with residential and commercial areas, of
mostly 1 to 2 storeys. Seeks to ensure that residential development minimises its impact on existing dwellings, does not
cause undue overshadowing and that associated fencing does not dominate the street and restrict passive surveillance.
More specific objectives for each precinct establish preferred setbacks and pedestrian connections. DDO9 also contains
a map specifying preferring maximum heights for each part of the activity centre and nearby residential precincts.
DDO10
Keilor Village
Activity Centre
C1Z, GRZ1
Applies to the Keilor Village Activity Centre, which is currently developed with 1–2 storey residential and commercial.
Seeks to facilitate high quality development that is respectful of the area’s character and history and that enhances the
appearance and connectivity of the village. Specifies that residential development on upper levels of retail development
should integrate with the street and that commercial development should respect the scale and privacy of neighbouring
residential areas. There is a preferred maximum building height of 2 storeys for the commercial strip.
DDO11
Brooklyn Industrial
and Commercial
Precinct
Primarily
IN1Z with
some C2Z
and PUZ1
Not residential.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
629 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.9 Analysis of Residential Zone Schedules
Clause 54/55 Requirement Schedule variation
Commentary
Minimum Street Setback (A3
and B6)
Ground level and level 1 should be set back the
average of the adjoining lots
This variation does not differ greatly from the base standards set out in ResCode. By using the
average of existing setbacks, the variation is unlikely to support substantial change, as
intended by the zone, and instead will reinforce existing patterns of development.
Site coverage (A5 and B8)
The site area covered by buildings should not
exceed 70%
This variation allows for higher site coverage than the base Standard (60%), which is
consistent with the expectation for more intensive development.
Permeability (A6 and B9)
None specified
The base standard of 20% applies. This may be difficult to achieve in the context of the
elevated 70% site coverage.
Landscaping (B13)
A minimum of 1 medium sized tree of 6-12 m (at
maturity) should be provided in the front setback.
Planting to be provided along the length of any
driveway. Where new building bulk visually impacts
on adjoining dwellings, a landscaped vertical
screen should be provided.
This variation increases tree planting and landscaping requirements. It aligns with the street
setback objectives but can be a limitation on increased density. VCAT has recognised the
tension between aspirations for increased canopy coverage, and increased density.
Council planners report that the requirement for vertical screens is not achieving desired
outcomes and planting often struggles to survive in the limited space available.
Side and rear setbacks (A10 and
B17)
None specified
This standard can limit the height and intensity of development on small to average sized lots
because upper floors are often unable to achieve the required setbacks and have sufficient
usable floor space. Consolidation of lots is generally required to achieve heights above 2–3
storeys and comply with B17. While lot consolidation is encouraged by the RGZ1 is often difficult
to achieve in practice.
Walls on boundaries (A11 and
B18)
None specified
Deferring to a standard that relies on reference to existing built form (especially where that
existing built form comprises single storey dwellings) is unlikely to support substantial change in
a meaningful way.
Private open space (A17 and
B28)
An area of 15-40sqm at ground level with
convenient access from a living room, or A balcony
This variation reduces the requirement for ground floor open space while increasing the
requirement for balconies. The reduced ground floor POS requirement supports more intensive
development, while the varied balcony requirement seeks to improve amenity for residents in
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
630 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Clause 54/55 Requirement Schedule variation
Commentary
of 8-12sqm with a minimum width of 2 m and
convenient access from a living room.
higher density development. It is understood that, in general, new development achieves the
lower end of the specified range for ground floor POS.
Front fence height (A20 and B32) None specified
A20 and B32 establish a maximum front fence height of 2m for streets in a Transport Zone 2
and 1.5m for all other streets.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
631 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Table 1: GRZ1 ResCode variations analysis
Clause 54/55
Requirement
Schedule variation
Commentary
Minimum Street
Setback (A3 and B6)
None specified
VCAT has allowed reductions to the street setback requirement where it reflects the
pattern of surrounding setbacks.
Site coverage (A5 and
B8)
None specified
Permeability (A6 and
B9)
None specified
The 20% requirement can be difficult to achieve where extensive areas of the site are
being used for vehicle access (a common feature of t multi-unit developments in the
GRZ1.
Landscaping (B13)
A minimum of 1 medium-sized tree of 6-12 m (at maturity)
should be provided in the front setback. A minimum of 1
small to medium sized tree up to 6 m (at maturity) should
be provided in private or secluded private open space
greater than 25sqm in area. Planting to be provided along
the length of any driveway.
Where new building bulk visually impacts on adjoining
dwellings, a landscaped vertical screen should be
provided.
Side and rear setbacks
(A10 and B17)
None specified
This standard could be a limitation on development to 3 storeys (as permitted by the
zone) on narrow lots, where upper floors are unable to achieve the required setbacks and
have sufficient usable space.
There is limited direction on Council’s expectations for setbacks of dwellings at the rear of
lots.
Walls on boundaries
(A11 and B18)
None specified
Private open space
(A17 and B28)
An area of 40sqm, with one part of the private open
space to consist of secluded private open space with a
minimum area of 25sqm and a minimum dimension of 4m.
Secluded private open space should not be in the front
setback of a dwelling or residential building and should
have convenient access from a living room.
VCAT has allowed SPOS in the front setback when deemed appropriate in the context of
the specific site characteristics.
Front fence height (A20
and B32)
None specified
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
632 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Table 2: NRZ1 ResCode variations analysis
Clause 54/55
Requirement
Schedule variation
Commentary
Minimum Street
Setback (A3 and
B6)
None specified
The base variation applies, which would generally maintain the existing pattern of setbacks.
Front setbacks, or marginal reductions to front setbacks have generally been observed on
infill development.
Site coverage (A5
and B8)
The site area covered by buildings should not exceed
50%.
This variation from the base standard of 60% should result in greater spaciousness around
new development, and enhanced space for landscaping. A review of sample developments
indicates that 50% is achievable, however most of the balance of the site is generally used for
driveway access, not landscaping.
Permeability (A6
and B9)
30%
This variation from the base standard of 20% is consistent with the desire to increase
spaciousness and landscaping. However, based on a review of sample developments, it does
not appear that this higher standard is being achieved. This is largely due to the predominant
pattern of multi-unit development, where a long impermeable driveway along the boundary is
used to access units, leaving limited space for landscaping. In addition, a review of aerial
photography indicates that private open spaces are often paved or covered (this may occur
sometime after the initial development), further reducing permeability.
Landscaping
(B13)
A minimum of 2 medium sized trees of 6–12m (at
maturity) should be provided in the front setback. A
minimum of 1 small to medium sized tree up to 6m (at
maturity) should be provided in private or secluded
private open space. Planting to be provided along the
length of any driveway. Where new building bulk visually
impacts on adjoining dwellings, a landscaped vertical
screen should be provided.
This variation only applies to more than one dwelling on a lot and provides greater
specification for tree planting and landscaping than the base standard, and the GRZ and RGZ
areas. It appears form a review of samples, that space is being provided (mainly due to front
setback and open space requirements), but that the canopy trees at the scale required are
not always present. This is particularly the case for trees in private open space, where
subsequent homeowners may have paved or covered their courtyards.
Side and rear
setbacks (A10
and B17)
None specified
The base standard applies, which requires a tiered setback depending on height of the
proposed building.
The absence of a variation also provides no direction on Council’s expectations for setbacks
(and as a result, heights) of dwellings at the rear of lots.
Walls on
boundaries (A11
and B18)
None specified
The base standard applies, which limits boundary walls based on the length of lot. This is
consistent with a desire to maintain a similar pattern of development.
Private open
space (A17 and
B28)
An area of 60sqm, with one part of the private open
space to consist of secluded private open space with a
minimum area of 40sqm and a minimum dimension of 5m.
Secluded private open space should not be in the front
Elevated expectations for open space are generally resulting in more spaciousness around
units, as compared to unit developments in the RGZ or GRZ, as indicated by a review of the
sample developments.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
633 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Clause 54/55
Requirement
Schedule variation
Commentary
setback of a dwelling or residential building and should
have convenient access from a living room.
Front fence height
(A20 and B32)
None specified
The base standard applies (2m for streets in a Transport Zone 2 and 1.5m for all other
streets). Where low or no fencing is a contributing feature of neighbourhood character, a
variation may be suitable.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
634 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.10 Summary of Character Type Observations from the Draft Neighbourhood Character Study (2019)
Character Type and
Zone
Description
Character Type 1
identified areas in the
RGZ, in and around key
activity centres and
transport nodes. These
areas are nominated as
appropriate for
accommodating
change, particularly in
the form of higher
density housing.
In the southern and central parts of the municipality, the areas are characterised by predominantly single to double storey detached dwellings from the
1950s-1970s, interspersed with more recent redevelopments of multi-storey and multi-dwelling developments. Block sizes within this Character Type are
generally the most varied, demonstrating a history of subdivision and redevelopment over time. The original large backyards of many homes (a result of
relatively deep blocks of 70m or so) have been subdivided and developed for a second or third dwelling on the lot, accessed via a side driveway.
Streetscapes are varied in quality, with a mixture of landscaping treatments comprising grassed nature strips, and diverse street tree species. Key
streetscape detail is found within the distinctive street patterns (comprising combination of linear and radial streetscapes around a central open space
feature, such as Albert Crescent in St Albans).
In the northern parts of the municipality, including around Watergardens, the predominant housing forms are more recent, streetscape patterns are less
linear, streetscapes offer more enhanced landscaping, and housing forms include both detached housing and concentrated areas of attached
units/townhouses.
Fencing treatments are generally low or visually permeable, but are highly diverse, with little consistency. Street setbacks are generally consistent within
back streets at approximately 5-7m, however are much more varied on main streets (where residential housing forms are more diverse, and where they
mix with more commercial land uses).
Character Type 2
identified areas of
GRZ
where the character is
consistent but is
undergoing a transition
consistent with an
‘incremental change’
zone.
This Character Type exhibits street patterns that are generally gridded. Lots from the original subdivision pattern are generous, ranging from 500m
2
to
650m
2
, with some larger lots up to 1,000m
2
. Lots are generally deeper than conventional lots in other parts of the municipality (for example, in the
northern Character Types), Side setbacks are generous on one side, to provide for vehicle access to garages/carports located to the rear. Houses
generally do not take up the full area of a lot, and rear gardens are generous, often comprising outbuildings.
Built form generally dates from the 1950s to 1990s and comprises single or double storey detached housing of weatherboard, brick or rendered brick.
Streets comprise standard grassed nature strips with low scale street tree planting (i.e., small-medium sized trees) of varying species. Front setbacks
are generally consistent in each street, from 5-7m, with low scale front gardens (i.e., small-medium bushes and trees).
Areas in the southern part of the municipality that are undergoing transition tend to include units and townhouses that make use of the generously
proportioned lots, with access to units via a driveway down one side of the lot (or centrally located on larger developed lots). Redevelopment in the
northern parts of the Character Type is limited, likely because the housing stock is relatively new.
Character Type 3
identified
GRZ
areas
that comprise relatively
recent development
(post 2000s).
In Character Type 3, lot sizes and street patterns vary depending on the estate. In Sydenham, streets are gridded, and lots range from 400-600m
2
.
Around Watergardens, in Keilor Plains and Taylors Lakes, street patterns are curvilinear and lot sizes are larger, generally 650-800m
2
.
Housing forms comprise single and double storey detached housing of more contemporary designs. Front setbacks are generally consistent (4-5m), and
side setbacks are minimal; the area is characterised by large houses that are built almost across the entire width of the lot.
Front yards are well landscaped, and front fencing is generally absent. Garages tend to be a dominant feature of the front building façade.
Redevelopment in this Character Type is limited, likely because the housing stock is relatively new. Street trees tend to be of more substantial scale in
this Character Type than in the southern parts of the municipality, but of varied species.
Character Type 4
applies to Keilor
Village, which is zoned
The area is bounded by the Calder Freeway has influenced the character of the area – the freeway alignment has created several irregular shaped lots
with housing backing on to the freeway. The precinct wraps around the Joe Brown Recreation Reserve, with a combination of housing fronting onto and
backing onto the reserve.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
635 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Character Type and
Zone
Description
GRZ
and exhibits
unique characteristics.
The area can be described as landscape dominated as it comprises wide streetscapes, with broad lawn nature strips and large canopy trees. Dwellings
are large, of 1–2 storeys, detached and located on large lots of 500 to 1000m2. Houses (and associated backyard treatments, such as swimming pools),
occupy much of the block, and houses are generally built across the full width of the block, with small side setbacks. As such, high site coverage is
considered a consistent character element, and there is limited opportunity for infill development in the form of additional dwellings to the rear of existing
dwellings. Redevelopment in the area has taken the form of townhouse style development on larger lots and corner lots and redevelopment in the form
of one for one replacement.
Architectural styles range from 1970s brick veneer to contemporary brick dwellings, with some demonstrating historical architectural allusions. Dwellings
are generally highly articulated with large windows to capture views and a mix of grand building forms and styles.
Front and side fencing vary, with no fencing in areas, and some high (approximately 1.5-1.8m), fencing in other areas. The combination of wide
landscaped streetscapes, large front setbacks (8-10m) and little to no fencing creates a sense of openness. The topography of the area is undulating,
and as such, housing on the low side of streets is often set below street level, while housing on the high side is elevated with visible retaining walls and
steep driveways.
Front yards tend to be highly landscaped, with formal gardens and large trees and shrubs.
Character Type 5
applies to the River
Valley Estate in
Sunshine North, which
is zoned
GRZ
and
exhibits unique
characteristics.
The River Valley estate land zoned GRZ undergoing development and therefore the character of the area is still emerging.
The future character of the River Valley Estate is guided by the River Valley Estate Development Plan 2002 (approved by Council) which establishes a
proposed subdivision layout that provides development outlook to the Maribyrnong River and various open space areas.
The land is undulating, with steep inclines in places. The River Valley Estate Development Plan provides a design response at a subdivision level to
address slope (i.e., alignment of roads, minimum lot sizes etc). Housing forms must be in accordance with the River Valley design guidelines that are
listed on the title of each lot. The design guidelines seek to ensure that built form responds to the topography of the land and for low, permeable front
fencing. Given the topography, benching of lots and use of retaining walls will be a defining characteristic of the area.
Character Type 6
applies to
NRZ
land in
older parts of
Brimbank, where
change is limited to due
to heritage constraints.
These precincts are generally grouped together given they are a similar era of development; 1900s to the 1970s. Dwellings predominantly consist of
single storey detached brick, rendered concrete or weatherboard dwellings on 500-800m2 lots, with some 1000m2 lots. Dwellings are mostly constructed
of light finishes and display various housing styles such as Edwardian, Federation and California Bungalow. Along Glengala Road there are areas of
consistent red brick single detached dwellings, which contributes to a unique built form and sense of intact architectural character.
Specific precincts consist of HOs that seek to protect heritage elements, which contribute to the overall neighbourhood character of the area.
These precincts consist of several very noticeable new infill developments. New infill developments include townhouses and units, some of which
present as single detached dwellings from the street, while others present as attached double storey townhouses. Front setbacks are generally
consistent (approximately 5 to 10m). Some dwellings have less than 5m setbacks, which disrupt the streetscape rhythm. Front garden treatments and
streetscape quality vary from low scale plantings (i.e., bushes and shrubs) to canopy trees. Areas consist of permeable front fences of various heights
and are of brick, wood, or a metal finish. Garages and carports are generally set back from the dwelling façade and do not dominate the streetscape.
Character Type 7
identified broad areas
of
NRZ
, where limited
change is proposed
due to the remoteness
of the area from
transport and services.
This Character Type grouped together precincts of similar era of development (generally from the 1970s to 2000s). Existing housing types vary, with 1–2
storey attached and detached dwellings the predominant type, but with small-lot housing in the form of townhouses emerging in places. As such, lot
sizes range from less than 300m2 to 1700m2.
Higher site coverage and narrow side setbacks contribute to a built form dominated character. Dwellings generally have a higher site coverage compared
to Character Types representing older eras of development and consist of narrow side setbacks with some walls on boundaries. Front setbacks of
developments built in the 1970s to 1990s conform to approximately 5-7m, while those built in the 2000s have shorter setbacks of approximately 3-4m.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
636 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Character Type and
Zone
Description
Single or double attached garages, which are in line with or forward of the dwelling façade are common. Precincts vary in front fence treatments.
Developments within the 1990s to 2000s generally lack front fences, which assists in softening the built form dominated character. Where front fences
are constructed, (predominantly within areas built in the 1980s), these are generally low and/or permeable. Some higher front fences are evident in some
areas, which disrupt the streetscape rhythm. 2000s era developments front public open spaces and include balconies providing active interfaces.
Character Type 8
applies to a discrete
area in Keilor, which is
zoned
NRZ
and
exhibits unique
characteristics.
A small Character Type comprising dwellings along Petrik Drive, displaying a landscape dominated character and distinct subdivision pattern of large lots
ranging from 1400 to 2700m2. The area is characterised by slope responsive built form and highly vegetated streetscapes consisting of canopy trees
and well-maintained and manicured front gardens with mature vegetation. The area has varied architectural styles and roofs, with some dwellings
displaying historical allusions (e.g., Queen Anne) or contemporary dwellings with flat roofs and neutral finishes (i.e., greys and whites). Dwellings are
generally highly articulated with large windows. Garages tend to be discretely located behind the front façade of the dwelling. The absence of fencing
contributes to the spacious open setting and landscape dominated character. Where fencing exists, it tends to disrupt the streetscape rhythm.
Character Type 9
applies to a discrete
area in Keilor, which is
zoned
NRZ
and
exhibits unique
characteristics.
This Character Type is landscape dominated as reflected in the slope responsive built form and highly vegetated streetscapes consisting of canopy trees
and well-maintained manicured front gardens. The area is characterised by 1–2 storey detached dwellings on a range of lots from 300 to 3900m2.
However, most lots are 500 to 650m2. Architectural styles range from 1970s brick veneer to contemporary brick dwellings, with some demonstrating
historical architectural allusions (e.g., incorporating Queen Anne features into the facade).
Dwellings are generally highly articulated with large windows and a mix of grand building forms and styles. Front fences are generally constructed of
various types and materials. Dwellings often lack front fences, which contributes to a sense of spaciousness. Where front fences exist, these are
generally low and/or permeable, which contribute to the spacious garden setting. Garage and carport treatments vary but generally do not dominate the
streetscape. Front setbacks vary between 5-10m. There are a limited number of dwellings with walls on boundaries along garage walls, which disrupt the
streetscape and built form rhythm.
Character Type 10
applies to the River
Valley Estate in
Sunshine North, which
is zoned
NRZ
and
exhibits unique
characteristics.
Contemporary development on sloping lots that are predominantly 400 to 650m2 in size. Landscape features such as the Maribyrnong River, the Quarry
Lake and indigenous canopy trees contribute to the landscape character of the precinct. Steps and retaining walls are key features of the River Valley
Estate given the topography.
The area is generally built form dominated with narrow side and front setbacks, which contribute to the lack of front gardens and vegetation within private
lots. Dwellings are generally between 1-3 storey single detached dwellings with varying roof styles consisting of tiled hipped and flat roofs. Dwellings are
generally highly articulated with large windows. Balconies and neutral to dark tones such as white, grey, and black are common. Generally, there is no
front fencing. Where front fences exist, these vary in height from low to high and are constructed of rendered concrete or metal. The area comprises
consistent street tree plantings.
Character Type 11
applies to an area in
northern Brimbank,
which is zoned
NRZ
and identified for
limited change.
This Character Type is characterised by large scale single to double storey dwellings on large lots predominantly ranging from 500 to 2600m2, which
contribute to its built form dominated character. Narrow side setbacks of approximately 2m or less and walls on boundaries are common.
Driveways and single to double attached garages, which are in line with or forward of the dwelling façade are common. The large scale built form is
softened by well-maintained and highly vegetated front gardens consisting of low scale plantings. Vegetated front gardens, consistent street tree
plantings and the absence of front fencing assist in softening the built form character and contributes to a spacious garden setting.
Shorter streets such as courts generally lack footpaths and are narrower in width. Dwellings display various roof styles such as tiled hip, gable, flat and
shed roofs. Architectural styles and materials typically consist of red brick or rendered concrete with light finishes such as cream or white. Some
dwellings demonstrate historical architectural allusions (e.g., incorporating Queen Anne features into the facade).
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
637 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.11 Major Redevelopment Sites with Apartments
Address Suburb Apts Street type Zone Overlay(s) Nearby attractions (walking distance)
21A
Foundry
Rd
Sunshine 229
Inner activity
centre connector
road (through
large parking
lots)
ACZ1
EAO,
DCPO1
Albion Station (11 min); Sunshine Station (14 min); Sunshine Marketplace (1 min);
Sunshine Plaza Shopping Centre (7 min); local cafes and restaurants (5 min); Victoria
University: Sunshine Campus (6 min)
265 Duke
St
Sunshine
North
176 Connector road
through an
undeveloped
area
C1Z
DPO3,
DCPO2
Duke Street Reserve (8 min); Maribyrnong River (11 min); local shops, services and
restaurants (7–10 minutes)
15-19
Service St
Sunshine 120 Local road
(branching off a
high street)
ACZ1
EAO,
SBO,
DCPO1
Sunshine Station (10 min); Bus routes (216, 220, 400, 408, 420, 422, 426, 427, 428, 429,
456, 471, 903, 941, 942) (6 min); Sunshine Plaza Shopping Centre (3 min); Sunshine
Marketplace (5 min); local shops, services and restaurants (3-5 min); Sunshine Leisure
Centre (3 min); Sunvale Community Park (3 min); childcare centre (5 min)
439-443
Ballarat Rd
Sunshine 75
Arterial road ACZ1
EAO,
DCPO1
Albion Station (17 min); Bus routes (215, 220, 941, 942) (7 min); Dempster Park (7 min);
Victoria University: Sunshine Campus (2 min); childcare centres (3–10 min); aged care
facility (11 min); Sunshine Marketplace (15 min); Sunshine Plaza (15 min)
342
Sydenham
Rd
Sydenham 74
Connector road RGZ1 DCPO2
Watergardens Station (7 min); Bus routes (419, 420, 421, 425, 476) (7 min); Watergardens
Shopping Centre (20 min); Rose Hedge Reserve and playground (9 min); Profita Avenue
Reserve (12 min); childcare centre (2 min); aged care facility (2 min)
13 West
Esplanade
St Albans 55
Local road
RGZ1
DDO9,
DCPO2
St Albans Station (5 min); Bus routes (408, 418, 419, 421, 423, 424, 425) (5 min); West
Esplanade Reserve and Playground (1 min); McKechnie Reserve (7 min); shops, services
and restaurants (5–10 min); St Albans Primary School (5 min)
19 Albert
Crescent
St Albans 53
Local road
RGZ1
DDO9,
DCPO2
St Albans Station (8–10 min); Bus routes (408, 418, 419, 421, 423, 424, 425) (8-10 min);
West Esplanade Reserve and Playground (3 min); McKechnie Reserve (10 min); shops,
services and restaurants (8–12 min); St Albans Primary School (4 min)
22-24
Talmage
St
Albion
46
Local road
GRZ1
HO77,
DCPO2
Albion Station (7 min); Bus routes (426, 456) (4 min); Sunshine Marketplace (10–15 min);
Barclay Reserve (3 min); childcare centre (6 min)
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
638 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Address Suburb Apts Street type Zone Overlay(s) Nearby attractions (walking distance)
32-36 Sun
Crescent
Sunshine 44
Connector road ACZ1
EAO,
DCPO1
Sunshine Station (5 min); Bus routes (216, 220, 400, 408, 420, 422, 426, 427, 428, 429,
456, 471, 903, 941, 942) (10 min); shops, services and cafes (5–15 min); Sunshine
Marketplace (10 min); Chaplin Reserve (5 min); Kororoit Creek Trail (5 min); RT Pollard
Gardens (6 min); Sunshine Primary School (10 min); Sunshine Secondary College (7
minutes)
13
Marsden
Crescent
St Albans 43
Local road
RGZ1
DDO9,
DCPO2
St Albans Station (5 min); Bus routes (408, 418, 419, 421, 423, 424, 425) (5 min); shops,
services and cafes (5–10 minutes); McKechnie Reserve (4 min); Errington Reserve (7
min); Rita Street Reserve (14 min)
541-547
Melton
Hwy
Sydenham 36
Connector road GRZ1 DCPO2
Watergardens Station (18 min); Bus routes (425, 460, 462, 463, 943) (4 min);
Watergardens Shopping Centre (18 min); local shops, services and restaurants (4 min);
aged care facility (8 min); childcare centre (10 min); Sydenham Hillside Primary School (14
min)
40-42
Glendenni
ng St
St Albans 33
Local road
RGZ1
DDO9,
DCPO2
St Albans Station (6 min); local restaurants, stores and services (2 min); McKechnie
Reserve (6 min); Rita Street Reserve (8 min); Protected Native Grassland Reserve (8 min);
Victoria University: St Albans Campus (17 min); St Albans Primary School (9 min)
64-66
Station Pl
Sunshine 29
Connector road
(in activity
centre)
ACZ1
DCPO1
Sunshine Station (2 min); Bus routes (216, 220, 400, 408, 420, 422, 426, 427, 428, 429,
456, 471, 903, 941, 942) (1 min); shops, cafes and restaurants (1 min); Sunshine Shopping
Plaza (10 min); Chaplin Reserve (12 min); K Wheelahan Gardens (9 min); Sunshine
Primary School (7 min)
23 Victoria
Crescent
St Albans 27
Local road
C1Z
DDO9,
DCPO2
St Albans Station (6 min); Bus routes (418, 421) (3 min); shops, services and restaurants
(3–5 min); St Albans Primary School (6 min); St Albans Secondary College (14 min); Huart
Reserve (3 min); Errington Reserve (10 min); McKechnie Reserve (10 min)
36 East
Esplanade
St Albans 25
Connector road C1Z
DDO9,
DCPO2
St Albans Station (6 min); Bus routes (418, 421) (5 min); shops, services and restaurants
(3–5 min); St Albans Primary School (5 min); St Albans Secondary College (14 min); Huart
Reserve (1 min); Errington Reserve (10 min); McKechnie Reserve (9 min)
87-91
Main Rd W
St Albans 10
Connector road C1Z
DDO9,
DCPO2
St Albans Station (4 min); Bus routes (424, 425) (3 min); shops, services and restaurants
(1–5 min); St Albans Primary School (9 min); St Albans Secondary College (12 min);
Victoria University: St Albans Campus (17 min); McKechnie Reserve (6 min); Errington
Reserve (8 min); Protected Native Grassland Reserve (10 min)
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
639 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Address Suburb Apts Street type Zone Overlay(s) Nearby attractions (walking distance)
21 Albert
Crescent
St Albans 19
Local road
RGZ1
DDO9,
DCPO2
St Albans Station (8 min); Bus routes (408, 418, 419, 421, 423, 424, 425) (8 min); West
Esplanade Reserve and Playground (3 min); McKechnie Reserve (10 min); shops, services
and restaurants (8–12 min); St Albans Primary School (3 min)
115 Main
Rd W
St Albans 16
Connector road RGZ1
DDO9,
DCPO2
St Albans Station (5 min); Bus routes (424, 425) (1 min); shops, services and restaurants
(1–5 min); St Albans Primary School (9 min); St Albans Secondary College (14 min);
Victoria University: St Albans Campus (19 min); McKechnie Reserve (7 min); Errington
Reserve (10 min); Protected Native Grassland Reserve (9 min)
507
Ballarat Rd
Albion
15
Arterial road ACZ1
DCPO1
Albion Station (2 min); Bus routes (426, 456) (1 min); Sunshine Marketplace (11 min);
Albion Primary School (4 min); Barclay Reserve (9 min); Victoria University: Sunshine
Campus (13 min); childcare centre (12 min)
21 Station
Pl
Sunshine 14
Local road
GRZ1 DCPO2
Sunshine Station (3 min); Bus routes (216, 220, 400, 408, 420, 422, 426, 427, 428, 429,
456, 471, 903, 941, 942) (4 min); Sunshine Plaza Shopping Centre (13 min); Sunshine
Marketplace (11 min); local shops, services and restaurants (8–10 min); Dickson Street
Reserve (8 min); K Wheelahan Gardens (9 min); Sunshine Leisure Centre (8 min);
Sunshine Primary School (10 min); childcare centre (12 min); aged care (6 min)
12-14
George St
Sunshine 12
Local road
ACZ1
DCPO1
Sunshine Station (10 min); Bus routes (216, 220, 400, 408, 420, 422, 426, 427, 428, 429,
456, 471, 903, 941, 942) (7 min); Sunshine Plaza Shopping Centre (4 min); Sunshine
Marketplace (5 min); local shops, services and restaurants (4–5 min); Sunvale Community
Park (3 min); Sunshine Leisure Centre (3 min); childcare centre (5 min); aged care centre
(5 min)
9 Pecks
Rd
Sydenham 11
Local road
RGZ1 DCPO1
Watergardens Station (8 min); Bus routes (421, 425, 460, 461, 476, 943) (9 min);
Watergardens Shopping Centre (13 min); aged care facility (5 min); childcare centre (1
min); Sydenham Hillside Primary School (15 min); Stagecoach Reserve (9 min)
104-106
Phoenix St
Sunshine
North
10
Local road
RGZ1
SBO,
DCPO2
Albion Station (12 min); Bus route (215, 903, 941) (4–5 min); big box stores (1 min); local
shops and services (10 min); Victoria University: Sunshine Campus (1 min); Sunshine
North Primary School (10 min); Phoenix Street Reserve (1 min); Dempster Park (6 min);
childcare centre (1 min)
67-69
Cornwall
Rd
Sunshine 10
Connector road GRZ1 DCPO2
Sunshine Station (12 min); Bus routes (216, 220, 400, 408, 420, 422, 426, 427, 428, 429,
456, 471, 903, 941, 942) (11 min); Sunshine Plaza Shopping Centre (14 min); local shops,
services and restaurants (11–15 min); K Wheelahan Gardens (5 min); Dickson Street
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
640 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Address Suburb Apts Street type Zone Overlay(s) Nearby attractions (walking distance)
Reserve (3 min); East Sunshine Kindergarten (6 min); Sunshine Primary School (17 min);
childcare (8 min); aged care (11 min)
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
641 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.12 VCAT Analysis
84 Power Street, ST ALBANS
Date
14 Dec 2017
VCAT Citation
Bullion Constructions Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2017] VCAT 2097
Description of Proposal
Construction of five double storey dwellings in 'reverse living' format
Outcome
Decision of the Responsible Authority is affirmed. No permit is granted.
Applicable Zones/Overlays
RGZ1
Key Points
Council refused the application on the basis that “
the development will result in significant social effects in the area due to a loss
of community cohesion, breakdown of social interaction and community resilience, and negative impacts on the physical health
and mental wellbeing of existing long-term residents”.
Council notes that
“the long term residents in the area have a right to stay and the transition between their homes and any new
development should be gradual, not extreme. Longer term members of the community should not be detrimentally affected by new
development.”
VCAT Findings
VCAT did not give weight to Council’s ground of refusal but refused the permit on range of factors relating to landscaping, visual
bulk to adjoining properties and internal amenity.
VCAT finds that:
that the proposal fails to provide an acceptable landscaping, visual bulk to adjoining properties, and internal amenity response.
an appropriate balance must be struck between the competing policies of the Planning Scheme.
the ‘reverse living’ format results in poor internal amenity, excessive screening and overlooking concerns.
the proposal provides an inadequate response to the design guidelines of Clause 55.04-6 -
overlooking
.
The limited landscaping does not achieve the RGZ1 landscaping requirements along the length of the driveway
the built form near the eastern boundary visually impacts on the adjoining property and that the proposed landscaping is not in
accordance with the RGZ1.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
642 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7 Brisbane Street, ALBION
Date
24 Jan 2018
VCAT Citation
Tabone v Brimbank CC [2018] VCAT 100
Description of Proposal
Construction of three two storey dwellings.
Outcome
Decision of the Responsible Authority is affirmed. No permit is granted.
Applicable Zones/Overlays
GRZ1
Key Points
Council considered the proposal inconsistent with Clause 21.07 as it does not respect the existing or preferred neighbourhood
character. Particularly siting, setbacks, design detail, open character/single storey scale and rear backyards landscape character.
Council was concerned that the second storey at the rear was unacceptable, and that insufficient space was provided for
landscaping and canopy trees in secluded private open space.
Council expresses that whilst the development complies with Standard B17 it still presents an unacceptable visual bulk to its
neighbours (VCAT accepted this position).
VCAT Findings
>
VCAT notes that there is no direction regarding whether two storey dwellings at the rear of properties are encouraged or
acceptable. But agreed that the massing to the rear was excessive on neighbourhood character grounds. VCAT raises issues
with matters of visual bulk and neighbourhood character.
>
VCAT did not support Council’s concern about lack of landscaping. VCAT noted Council cannot reasonably say that open space
areas that comply with the scheme fail to provide an adequate landscaping area.
>
VCAT also acknowledged the inevitable outcome of encouraging more dwellings within established neighbourhoods would be
less canopy vegetation within private properties. Canopy landscaping in and around multiple dwelling developments is usually
provided in the front setback, along the driveways and towards the rear of developments. It is less often provided within small
areas of private open space.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
643 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
63 Derrimut Street ALBION
Date
27 May 2019
VCAT Citation
Black T Small Footprint 21 Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2019] VCAT 881
Description of Proposal
Construction of five 2-storey dwellings
Outcome
Decision of the Responsible Authority is affirmed. No permit is granted
Applicable Zones/Overlays
GRZ1
Key Points
Council identified that the character of the neighbourhood is changing from older traditional single storey detached dwellings to
modern contemporary townhouse styles, resulting in a mix in neighbourhood character.
Council submission noted that in the absence of a neighbourhood character strategy/study that a decision must look at the
existing neighbourhood context.
VCAT Findings
>
VCAT decision relates primarily to whether or not the design has acceptable regard to neighbourhood character and notes that there
is nothing specific in the planning scheme in respect to neighbourhood character in Albion.
>
VCAT notes that it is more than just a built form response when you are constructing dwellings with two frontages.
>
Visitor car parking is to be considered in respect to the ultimate usage, equitable usage and the affect any additional car parking will
have on the neighbourhood character of an area.
>
VCAT addresses that whilst technical compliance with variation to standard B29 might not be met, there is still a need to consider
the usability of the space that has been created.
>
VCAT considers that there needs to be further thought given to side fencing, private open space, and landscaping.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
644 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
47 Derrimut Street, ALBION
Date
18 October 2019
VCAT Citation
Black T Small Footprint Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2019] VCAT 1621
Description of Proposal
Construction of five two storey dwellings
Outcome
Decision of the Responsible Authority is set aside. A permit is granted.
Applicable Zones/Overlays
GRZ1
Key Points
Council considers that the proposal is out of character with the area with regard to scale, built form, bulk, density, materials,
finishes, number of crossovers, amount of hard surface across the frontages of the site, and lack of trees.
Council finds that the development is not respectful of the Garden City suburb established by HV McKay which has a detrimental
impact on the streetscape.
Council notes that the proposal does not satisfy the objectives, strategies and policies of Clause 21.07-3 as it does not integrate
with the surrounding environment and detracts from the streetscape in terms of building design, height and massing.
Council considers that the proposal does not meet the objectives and standards of Clause 55, specifically standard B1 –
Neighbourhood character, standard B6 – Street setback, standard B29 – Solar access to open space and standard B32 – Design
detail and is an overdevelopment of the land.
The Albion and Ardeer Community Club Inc. support Council's decision and note that the development is not suitably sensitive to
the special characteristics of the area.
VCAT Findings
>
VCAT notes that the Brimbank Planning Scheme contains no specific local neighbourhood character policies that would assist in
considering how development should respond to its context, both physical and policy.
>
VCAT references that Clause 21.07-3 outlines the key elements that contribute to the existing neighbourhood character being
building setbacks, colours and finishes, design detail and the landscaped setting.
>
VCAT notes that " The proposal will no doubt look different to what currently exists in this part of Albion. However, looking different
does not make it unreasonable"
>
VCAT considers that the Planning Scheme provides little guidance to assist developers and residents on what respectful
redevelopment would look like.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
645 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
19 Burrowye Crescent TAYLORS LAKES
Date
22 July 2020
VCAT Citation
Kropf v Brimbank CC [2020] VCAT 941
Description of Proposal
Construction of five double storey dwellings.
Outcome
Decision of Council affirmed; no permit granted.
Applicable Zones/Overlays
NRZ1, SBO
Key Points
Council took issue with the lack of side setbacks proposed accessibility of the car spaces and aspects of internal amenity.
VCAT Findings
>
VCAT affirmed the refusal, taking issue with the siting of some of the dwellings, the lack of landscaping and several habitable
rooms reliant on skylights. VCAT did not agree with Council’s focus on the issue of setbacks.
>
Notes that there is no policy guidance of what is meant by limited change in the NRZ1, and notes that the neighbourhood character
of the areas is mixed.
>
VCAT noted that Council policy requiring ‘protection’ of neighbourhood character is quite strong, and references other parts of
the Planning Scheme that requires ‘respect’ for neighbourhood character (the purpose of the zone and Clause 55).
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
646 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
63 Derrimut Street ALBION
Date
11 November 2020
VCAT Citation
Black T/Small Footprint Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2020] VCAT 1262
Description of Proposal
Construction of five double storey dwellings.
Outcome
Decision of Council affirmed; no permit granted.
Applicable Zones/Overlays
GRZ1
Key Points
Council refused on the grounds of failure to respond to the neighbourhood character of the area, unacceptable proposed car
parking arrangements, and impacts on the amenity of the adjoining properties.
Specifically, Council is critical of the extent of the dwelling form and length, use of parapet walls and flat roofs and articulation and
massing of built form to the street.
Council notes that the proposal fails to address Standard B29 in respect to solar access.
VCAT Findings
>
Drawing on Clause 15.01-5S, the purposes of GRZ1 (which varies Clause 55) and Clause 21.07-3, VCAT found that while the
construction of more than one dwelling on the site was supported by planning policy, the proposal failed to respect the
neighbourhood character of the area.
>
VCAT were critical of the proposal to create indented parking bays within the road reserve, the useability of private open space
and a lack of detail with respect to shadow diagrams.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
647 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
1 Wood Street, DEER PARK
Date
11 January 2021
VCAT Citation
Canterlever Construction Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 19
Description of Proposal
Construction of seven two and three bedroom dwellings sited one behind the other. Reverse living arrangement (except Unit 7).
Outcome
Decision of Council affirmed; no permit granted.
Applicable Zones/Overlays
RGZ1
Key Points
Council refused due to limited landscaping opportunities that fail to compensate for increased density and reduced amenity for
residents in area due to increased traffic, built form and lack of landscaping. Including greater site coverage, building surface area
and demand for energy consumption.
VCAT Findings
>
VCAT found proposal had not struck an acceptable balance between objectives for increased housing intensification and policies
that ask for development that respond to an area’s context and character, and which also achieve high quality, innovative, and
site responsive design outcomes. VCAT notes issues with lack of landscaping, reliance on windows and screens to prevent
overlooking, and visual bulk.
>
VCAT notes that in reading the planning scheme policies, controls and provisions including the varied Clause 55 standards and
decision guidelines in RGZ1, that these collectively emphasise the importance of high quality urban design, buildings, and better
landscaping outcomes.
>
VCAT notes that standard B13 in the RGZ1 is not achieved and would not mitigate the effect of building bulk.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
648 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
1 Neimur Avenue, DEER PARK
Date
10 June 2021
VCAT Citation
I and F Investments Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 603
Description of Proposal
Construction of 6 double storey dwellings.
Outcome
Decision of Council set aside; permit granted.
Applicable Zones/Overlays
RGZ1
Key Points
Council refused on matters of neighbourhood character – scale, setbacks, and insufficient room for canopy tree.
Council refused on grounds that front setback did not comply with Standard B6 of Clause 55.
Applicant claimed Council refused due to pressure from residents who are not happy with Council’s strategic decision to place this
land in the Residential Growth Zone.
Council notes that not all RGZ1 areas are equal, with RGZ1 in or abutting activity centres able to achieve a greater level of
change, and a lesser level of change closer to the 'residential hinterland'.
VCAT Findings
>
VCAT disagreed that the location is not appropriate for the scale of development proposed. VCAT noted Council's expectation of
graduated change within the RGZ is not clearly articulated in Clauses 21.04 and 21.07. However, VCAT did consider aspects of
character in assessing the application due to the presence of a preferred character statement for the RGZ in at Clause 21.07-3.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
649 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
29 Poole Street, DEER PARK
Date
29 Nov 2021
VCAT Citation
Pisano v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 1412
Description of Proposal
Construction of five three-storey dwellings in a 'reverse living' format.
Outcome
Decision of Council set aside; permit granted subject to conditions
Applicable Zones/Overlays
RGZ1
Key Points
Council refused the application on ResCode grounds, particularly solar access, setbacks, scale, and visual impact on street.
Council submits that the proposal will have an overbearing and visually intrusive form to the street.
VCAT Findings
>
VCAT found that the scale was acceptable, noting the RGZ anticipates change to the character of the area. VCAT noted that
scale transitions are relevant only at the interface of different zones, not adjoining properties (as per RGZ1 decision guidelines).
>
Minor variations to Clause 55 setback standards were considered acceptable in the context of the design.
>
VCAT dismissed concerns about lack of housing diversity and the inability of reverse living to accommodate people of varied
abilities on the basis that the dwelling diversity clause of ResCode does not apply to development of fewer than 10 dwellings.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
650 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Other VCAT cases reviewed but not cited in this Background Report:
Case
Neighbourhood Character Issues Considered
Gorgievski v Brimbank CC [2018] VCAT 635
Landscape character, building bulk and scale.
Gulabovski v Brimbank CC [2019] VCAT 454
Built form character, streetscape character and rhythm.
RSMG Investments Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2019] VCAT 756
Setbacks, landscaping.
Nguyen v Brimbank CC [2019] VCAT 935
Setbacks, scale, form and building bulk.
PBG Real Estate Holdings Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2019] VCAT 1303
Building bulk, side setbacks, landscaping, streetscape character, articulation, design
details (roofing).
Panorama Investment (Albanvale) Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2020] VCAT 859
Design details, setbacks, building articulation.
Riva Ridge Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2020] VCAT 1342
Form and building bulk, design details (walls and roofing), streetscape character and
building articulation.
CitiWest Constructions Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 363
Siting, setbacks, design detail, landscaping.
P & H Group Enterprises Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 400
Building scale, massing and articulation; setback; streetscape character and rhythm.
35 West Esplanade Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 433
Building scale and bulk, landscaping, front setback, driveway siting and scale (limits
landscaping).
Lieu v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 611
Built form, massing and scale; setbacks; streetscape character.
Pegan v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 687
Siting, scale, vehicle access, streetscape character and rhythm.
Minalex Enterprises Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 924
Building scale, setbacks, landscaping, streetscape character and rhythm.
Sunshine Vale Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2021] VCAT 1058
Landscaping, maintenance.
JBHcom Pty Ltd v Brimbank CC [2022] VCAT 270
Building form and bulk, setbacks, design details, landscaping.
Planning and Design v Brimbank CC [2022] VCAT 256
Visual bulk and massing, setbacks, materials and finishes.
Wilkin v Brimbank CC [2022] VCAT 791
Landscape character, front setbacks, building bulk and scale.
Nguyen v Brimbank CC [2022] VCAT 831
Setbacks, design details.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
651 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
7.13 Suburb Profiles
The following contains site observations across all 19 residential suburbs.
Calder Park, Brooklyn, Keilor East and Tullamarine are employment-based suburbs and were not observed for
neighbourhood character. Keilor North falls outside of the Urban Growth Boundary and was not observed for
neighbourhood character either.
Albanvale
Zones and Overlay Plans
Figure 22: Albanvale - (Left) Dwellings along Opie Road. (Centre) Contemporary development adjoining McCann Drive.
(Right) A typical dwelling in Albanvale.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
652 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Predominately single storey detached dwellings. Traditional dwelling stock has similar architectural styles, roofing
and colour selection. Dwellings feature large open windows, often with roller shutters. The material of dwellings is
primarily brick, in brown, orange and cream colours.
Moderate front setbacks are consistent and allow for a mix of landscaping and vehicle access and/or parking
Front gardens are typically informally landscaped with low scale planting and expanses of lawn.
The street network is varied, and often includes court bowls. Streetscapes have footpaths on both sides of the
road. New street tree plantings are evident throughout and will increase canopy coverage in the future, contributing
to greening the suburb. Medium height and permeable front fences typically line the street, separating the private
and public realm.
Large scale contemporary infill development exists along Albanvale Drive in the south, but there is otherwise limited
infill development on local streets. There are few vacant sites within the local street network and a very large vacant
site in the south that adjoins Brimbank Shopping Centre. Brimbank Shopping Centre straddles the southern
boundary with limited pedestrian connectivity to residential areas to the north and west.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Consistency of siting, setbacks and site coverage:
Moderate front setbacks throughout.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Predominately brick in orange, brown and cream.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
New street tree planting.
Threats
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Visual bulk of contemporary development in the south.
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Car access and parking within front setbacks.
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Impacted front garden landscaping as a result of car access and parking.
•
Change in materiality or style:
Dominant use of roller shutters throughout.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 3: Albanvale Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Active residential interface to Main Road West and Kings Park in the north.
•
Vegetated landscape strip screens back of fence interface to Station Road.
•
Kororoit Creek extends along the full western boundary.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Limited established street trees; new street tree planting evident throughout.
•
Minimal front garden planting; typically only lawn with some low-rise plantings.
•
Landscaping is impacted by driveways and vehicle parking.
•
Some canopy coverage in front and rear gardens.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Curvilinear street network.
•
Court bowls are prominent in the west.
•
Wide streets throughout allow on-street parking, on both sides of the road.
•
Indented parking bays along McCann Drive, Isabella Court and Albanvale Drive.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
653 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Predominately moderate front and side setbacks.
•
Generous setbacks are typical for dwellings at the end of a court.
•
Larger site coverage and built form bulk on the lot typically results in minimal
side setbacks.
•
Minimal setbacks are typical as part of large scale contemporary infill
development in the south.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise, predominately single storey detached dwellings.
•
Double storey detached dwellings and attached townhouses as part of southern
large scale infill development.
•
2000s era townhouse and unit development along Opie Road.
Lot size
•
Predominately 500–650sqm.
•
1000sqm adjoining Kororoit Creek.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Front fencing is common throughout.
•
Predominately low to medium height and permeable.
•
Typically metal ‘pool style’ or brick materials in various colours.
•
Contemporary infill dwellings typically have no front fences.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
A mixture of carports and integrated garages.
•
Side setbacks provide vehicle parking and access for most dwellings.
•
A mixture of double and single crossovers. Contemporary infill development in
the south has double crossovers.
•
Rear access to dwellings as part of large scale contemporary infill development
in the south.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately 1980s era.
•
Contemporary infill development adjoining McCann Drive.
•
Limited amount of contemporary infill development within broader suburb.
Example: Evergreen Avenue and Guest Avenue.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Predominately brick dwellings of orange, brown and cream colours.
•
Carports typically of Colorbond steel that matches the dwelling colour palette.
•
High levels of dwelling quality.
•
Some instances of reduced maintenance to dwellings.
•
Dominant use of roller shutters throughout.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip style roofs.
•
Some instances of gable style roofs.
•
Garages and carports typically feature flat roofs.
•
Mixture of roof colours. Predominately tile materials.
•
Eaves are common single storey dwellings.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths on both sides of the street.
•
Pedestrian paths on a single side of the street as part of large scale infill
development in the south.
•
Pedestrian paths connect to open spaces via laneway access.
•
Shared user path along Kororoit Creek along the rear of dwellings.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
654 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Albion
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 23: Albion - (Left) Heritage dwellings along Coolamon Street. (Centre) Contemporary development along Talmage
Street. (Right) Streetscape improvement works along Burnewang Street.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
655 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Predominately residential with a mixture of housing styles and eras that generally have similar building materials,
finishes and roof styles. Various heritage overlays protect both dwellings and the broader subdivision pattern,
including the War Services Home Estate (HO26) and McKay Housing Estates (HO24). Heritage dwellings are
typically constructed of weatherboard, in muted tones.
Dwellings not protected by heritage overlays often employ heritage design features, creating a sense of
cohesion between new and older developments.
Flat topography and an unconventional grid street network allow for sight lines and strong pedestrian connectivity
to open space and Kororoit Creek.
Contemporary infill development is occurring in close proximity to Albion Station. The Sunshine National
Employment and Innovation Cluster identifies the Albion Station Precinct as an area for intensification and
highlights several sites for major redevelopment and denser housing forms.
Albion includes two education facilities and various active recreation opportunities including baseball, tennis, cricket
and lawn bowls. An employment area in the north is separated from residential areas by Ballarat Road. Forrest
Street and the rail line noise barrier visually and physically separates Albion from Sunshine West.
A residential aged care facility at 639 Ballarat Road in the west isolates a pocket of residential development. The
facility increases fencing heights with no permeability to the residential area and abutting streets, this creates a
poor character outcome in the west of Albion.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Established palm trees and canopy tree coverage contribute to a garden
setting.
•
Connections to open space:
Key roads lead to open space in the southwest, contributing to a sense of
place and connection to green space.
•
Consistency of siting, setbacks and site coverage:
Moderate front setbacks and low rise dwellings.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Front garden landscaping and canopy trees within the private realm
contribute to a garden setting.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Mixed brick and weatherboard materials.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Uniform roof styles.
•
Street layout:
Streetscapes promote walking via raised crossings, central medians and connected
pathways.
Threats
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Visual bulk of multi-unit development and contemporary infill development
particularly in proximity to Albion Station.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Contemporary infill development not in keeping with the low rise scale of
traditional housing stock.
•
Limited connectivity or accessibility:
Rail line noise barrier in the south limits connection and visibility
through to Sunshine West.
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Minimal front garden landscaping and minimal front setbacks as a result of
contemporary development increasing built bulk to the street.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
656 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 4: Albion Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Varied residential frontage to bounding roads, Kororoit Creek and the rail line.
•
Inconsistent residential address and frontage to Ballarat Road.
•
Perth Avenue undergoing an increased level of residential change than in other
parts of the suburb.
•
Rail line noise barriers limit connectivity and visibility through to Sunshine West.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Varied frequencies of street tree planting. Often varied in scale and species.
•
Moderate levels of established street trees particularly in comparison to
Sunshine West and Sunshine.
•
Minimal to moderate front garden landscaping with low-rise planting and/or lawn.
•
Established palm trees within the private and public realm.
•
Key roads lead to open space in the southwest. Dwellings front onto open space
and creates passive surveillance opportunities.
•
Backyards often viewed from the street due to building sighting and permeable
side fencing.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Non-conventional grid street layout that reflects HV McKay’s ‘garden-city’ plans.
•
Dead-end style roads adjoin open space assets.
•
Streetscape improvement works throughout.
•
Tree lined streets provide visual links and connectivity to adjoining open spaces
and natural assets.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Consistent moderate front and side setbacks provide sufficient space for
landscaping. This is particularly evident with traditional and heritage-protected
housing stock.
•
Minimal front and side setbacks associated with contemporary infill development
and post-war multi-level units.
Example: Ridley Street and Forest Street
.
•
Side setbacks allow for vehicle parking and access to carports and rear sheds.
•
Multi-unit developments in the southeast achieve uniform setbacks.
Example:
Ridley Street and King Edward Avenue.
•
Contemporary infill and multi-level unit developments display increased site
coverage.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise, predominately single storey brick or weatherboard dwellings.
•
Contemporary infill townhouse typologies scattered throughout suburb, typically
double storey.
•
Multi-level flats no greater than three storeys in the southeast and adjoining the
Albion Station.
•
Higher buildings could obscure view lines to the silos in the northeast.
•
Contemporary infill and multi-level unit developments display more intensive built
forms.
Lot size
•
Varied lot sizes, with lot sizes increasing towards the southeast.
•
Large lots are associated with multi-level low scale apartments.
•
Residential density increases in the south, particularly along Forrest Street.
•
Contemporary infill development increases density adjoining Albion Station.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Low to moderate height, permeable front fences are common, typically of brick,
wood or a metal material.
•
High fencing more common adjoining Ballarat Road, typically brick with wrought
iron details.
•
Timber style fencing styles in the south and southeast, often as part of early
1900s era housing.
Example: King Edward Avenue.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
657 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Contemporary infill development often includes moderate height front fencing
that mimics early 1900s styles of timber or timber-look material.
•
Metal ‘pool style’ fencing is common.
•
Moderate scale, permeable front fencing is a prominent feature on most
dwellings along Adelaide Street.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Garages and carports are generally set back from the front façade and do not
dominate the streetscape.
•
Side setbacks generally provide vehicle parking for detached, multi-unit and
contemporary infill development.
•
Infill development typically achieve garages integrated with the built form.
•
Heritage dwellings typically do not have garages and carports and often achieve
vehicle access from the rear of the property.
•
Predominately single crossovers.
•
Ample opportunity for on-street car parking.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately 1900 to 1940s era.
•
Some 1950s to 1970s eras.
•
Recent contemporary infill development in the north, along Perth Street and
adjoining Selwyn Park.
•
Various vacant sites throughout.
•
Vacant/single dwelling lots often redeveloped into contemporary multi-unit
developments in the south.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Various housing styles—Edwardian, Federation and California Bungalow —
typically of light colours.
•
Contemporary infill development and multi-level units in varied building materials
and colour selection.
Example: Forrest Street.
•
Some contemporary infill developments include weatherboard and mock heritage
details.
•
Traditional brick dwellings typically orange and cream brick.
•
Weatherboard dwellings typically of varied colour and condition.
•
Heritage protected dwellings typically of weatherboard material.
•
Consistent use of mixed brick and weatherboard materials along Adelaide Street.
•
Dwellings on Adelaide Street are often less maintained than other areas.
•
Varied building quality and level of maintenance to multi-level units and
dwellings off Wasley Street. Visible signs of sun damage and building cracking.
•
Varied levels of maintenance to heritage protected dwellings.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately tiled, hip styles and some gable styles.
•
Heritage protected dwellings typically feature Colorbond steel or corrugated iron
dutch and gable roof styles.
•
Terracotta tile colours are common as part of brick dwellings.
•
Eaves and verandas are common as part of traditional housing stock.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian crossings, central medians and vehicle slowing devices.
•
Dedicated on street bicycle lanes along key streets.
•
Consistent streetscapes that promote walking via raised crossings, central
medians and connected pathways.
•
Water sensitive urban design (WSUD) treatments along Ridley Street.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
658 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Ardeer
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 24: Ardeer - (Left) Typical dwelling in Ardeer. (Centre) Dwellings along Holt Street. (Right) dwellings along
Rockbank Road.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
659 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Single storey detached dwellings with some double storey infill is the predominate housing typology.
Contemporary medium density townhouse and unit developments are scattered throughout and at greater
concentrations south of Kororoit Creek.
Building styles are diverse and reflective of reoccurring renovation and redevelopment of traditional
housing stock.
The diverse mix of building styles includes brick veneer, rendered brick and weatherboard façade treatments.
Detached dwellings are typically situated on moderate lots. Moderate landscaping in front gardens, with varied
heights of planting and mixed species selection. Front landscaping is minimal as part of contemporary infill
development. Topography variation in the north results in retaining walls and side and back fences to the street
and Kororoit Creek.
Kororoit Creek physically separates the north and south of the suburb and creates a natural separation between
residential zones. Bridged pedestrian connections provide limited north-south accessibility. Ballarat Road also
provides a physical separation between residential development and mixed use/industrial development in the
north. The Metropolitan Ring Road, Kororoit Creek and the Rail Corridor further limit connection to adjoining
suburbs. Together this contributes to a sense of containment and enclosure of Ardeer’s residential areas.
Dwellings are serviced by local convenience, education and recreation facilities. Heritage Overlay (Schedule 147)
affects a row of dwellings in the south.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Connections to open space:
Strong connection to natural features of Kororoit Creek.
•
Street layout:
Wide streets with pedestrian paths on both sides.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Established trees contribute to streetscape character.
•
Consistency of siting, setbacks and site coverage:
Moderate front setbacks
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
canopy trees within the private and public realm contribute to a spacious
street setting.
Threats
•
Limited connectivity or accessibility:
Rail line sound wall limits visual and physical connection to
Sunshine West and is a dominant feature of the street.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Scale and siting of contemporary infill development is inconsistent with
traditional housing stock.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 5: Ardeer Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Limited visual and physical connection to the rail corridor and Sunshine West to
the south.
•
Slip lane access is provided to residential properties with frontage to Ballarat
Road.
•
Back of fence interface with Kororoit Creek provides a separation between
Ardeer and Albion in the east.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Moderate to generous landscaping within front gardens.
•
Established fruit trees throughout as part of nature strip and front garden
landscaping.
•
Generous backyard landscaping which can often be viewed from the street.
•
Consistent street tree planting along McLaughlin Street and Holt Street observed
as part of 2019 Neighbourhood Character Study is affirmed.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
660 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Grid based road network.
•
No vehicle access across Kororoit Creek.
•
Wide streetscapes.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Moderate front setbacks associated with both traditional housing stock and
contemporary detached dwellings.
•
Some instances of contemporary unit and townhouse infill developments
respecting existing setbacks.
•
Other instances of minimal front, side and rear setbacks or no setback to side
boundary as part of contemporary development.
•
Detached dwellings have generous single-side setbacks often achieving space
for car parking or access to a shed at rear of property.
Building types &
height
•
Predominantly single storey detached dwellings.
•
Contemporary multi-dwelling unit developments along Kororoit Creek
•
Recent developments are often double storey in height.
•
Dual-occupancy outcomes throughout, often with a second dwelling to the rear of
an existing dwelling.
Lot size
•
Predominately 500–650sqm lots.
•
650–800sqm lots in the northwest with very limited occurrence in the south.
•
Larger lots over 1000sqm adjoining the southern edge of Kororoit Creek.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Low and permeable front fencing common.
•
Contemporary developments often have no front fencing.
•
Brick, metal ‘pool style’ and permeable timber fencing materials are common.
•
Traditional timber side and rear fencing is common.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Carports and garages generally in line with, or set back from, the dwelling façade
as part of traditional housing stock.
•
Contemporary development typically includes garages in line with the front
façade.
•
Predominantly single crossovers.
•
Contemporary unit and townhouse developments achieve access via shared
driveways/common property.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Mixture of post-war and 2000s development.
•
Post-war development is most prominent.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Brick dwellings and weatherboard material are most common.
•
Weatherboard is often associated with post-war development, in varied colours.
•
Varying levels of building maintenance which impacts the condition of the
dwelling façade.
•
Contemporary developments generally consist of a mix of brick and rendered
concrete neutral finishes (i.e., whites and greys).
•
Large presence of roller shutters in the northern areas.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Roofs are generally tiled (terracotta and black in colour) in hipped or gable style.
•
Flat roofs more common as part of contemporary development.
•
Weatherboard dwellings frequently have Dutch and gable style roofs in
Colorbond or corrugated iron material.
•
Eaves are common on both single and double storey dwellings.
•
Some instances of solar panels on roofs.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
661 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Varied streetscape quality and inconsistent street tree plantings.
•
More established street trees adjoining Kororoit Creek.
•
Pedestrian paths on both sides of the street, connecting to open space and the
street network.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
662 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Cairnlea
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 25: Cairnlea - (Left) Dwellings along Delma Avenue. (Centre) Dwelling built to side property boundaries. (Right)
Apartment typology adjoining the Town Centre.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
663 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Single and double storey dwellings feature a mixture of building materials and colours, creating diversity and
visual separation of dwellings along the street. Predominately detached dwellings with frequent pockets of
townhouse and unit developments. A recent apartment development in the Cairnlea Town Centre, contributes to a
diversity of housing typologies within the suburb.
Private realm landscaping is minimal as a result of minimal front and side setbacks and intensive built forms.
Public realm landscaping is often generous and integrated into the overall subdivision layout. This provides
physical access and visual connection to open space and the natural environment and contributes to a sense of
greening and increased amenity for residents.
The road network is curved with some instances of court bowl/dead-end style road design, often as a result of
intersecting open space or conservation reserves. The streets create an open, spacious and uniform network that
allows for pedestrian and cyclist connectivity and amenity.
Cairnlea is located on the site of the former Albion Explosives Factory and is a master planned community still
under a level of construction. Further development is expected along Cairnlea Drive and Ballarat Road. The
Cairnlea Retail Centre Urban Design Guidelines (2002) have made a strong contribution to the overall siting and
design of dwellings, resulting in visual interest and material variation, and creating uniform setbacks and building
siting.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Established street tree planting and generous public realm landscaping
contributes to a landscape setting.
•
Street Layout:
Wide roads, cycle and pedestrian connections and planted central medians creates a
strong streetscape character.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Well-maintained and complementary building
styles and finishes create diversity along the street.
•
Low to moderate height front fencing:
Little to no front fencing contributes to a spacious street setting.
Threats
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Dominant double garages and prominent driveways
•
Inadequate landscaping:
reduce front garden landscaping.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Larger, dominant built form reduce opportunities for additional canopy tree
planting.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 6: Cairnlea Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Transmission line easement and wetlands in the north and Jones Creek in the
east, provide a natural separation between St Albans and Cairnlea.
•
The only western vehicle connection is via Furlong Road.
•
Residential density increases closer to Cairnlea Town Centre.
Example: Nobel
Banks Drive.
•
Areas in the south and centre may undergo development in the near future.
•
Dwellings front Station Road with access via service roads.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Established street tree planting on most streets.
•
Minimal to moderate landscaping in front gardens with low to medium planting or
lawns.
•
Some front gardens achieve an established canopy tree.
•
Gravel and/or rocks used in replacement of plants and lawn.
•
Public realm includes generous landscaping and play, picnic or seating
infrastructure.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
664 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Unconventional grid street network with limited dead-end roads.
•
Streets are wide and provide opportunities for parking on both sides.
•
Some formalised street parking bays around education and recreation precincts.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Minimal to moderate front setbacks that are consistent across the street.
•
Minimal side setbacks with some instances of no side setbacks.
•
Garages are predominately built to side boundary.
•
High site coverage due to intensive built form.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise, a mixture of single and double storey heights.
•
Multi-unit and townhouse typologies are typically double storey.
•
Six storey apartment building adjoining the town centre.
Lot size
•
Predominately 300–500sqm and 500–650sqm lots.
•
Very small and small lot sizes in proximity to town centre and along key local
streets.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Typically no front fencing.
•
Limited instances of medium height fencing typically in metal ‘pool style’. These
are found more frequently adjoining key local roads and Station Road.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Varied side setbacks throughout.
•
Some moderate side setbacks providing additional landscaping and/or private
open space.
•
Predominately single crossovers.
•
Multi-unit developments and townhouses typologies achieve access via shared
driveways/common property.
•
Large driveways give access to dual garages and increase impervious areas.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately 1990s to 2000s builds.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Predominately brick dwellings in red, orange and cream colours
•
Rendered dwellings are common, typically in cream and dark grey colours.
•
Limited instances of other material types and colours.
•
Dwellings are well-maintained.
•
Reduced build quality more typical in townhouse and unit typologies. Viable sun
and water damage of rendered and metal materials.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip roof styles in terracotta and grey tile.
•
Some instances of Dutch and gable roof styles.
•
Limited instances of eaves.
•
Some instances of solar panels on roofs.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths on both sides of residential streets.
•
Pedestrian paths link into shared paths within natural assets and open space.
•
On-road cycling lanes on Furlong Road and Cairnlea Boulevard.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
665 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Deer Park
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 26: Deer Park - (Left) Typical dwelling north of Ballarat Road. (Centre) Dwelling facade diversity south of Ballarat
Road. (Right) A heritage dwelling on Station Road.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
666 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
A mixture of traditional housing stock and more contemporary development. Townhouse and unit developments
are scattered throughout and at greater concentrations in proximity to Deer Park Train Station and Ballarat Road.
Various small scale and larger vacant sites exist throughout the suburb.
Architectural styles are diverse and reflective of the contemporary redevelopment of traditional housing
stock and contemporary infill development.
Traditional housing stock is typically situated on small sized lots with minimal front garden landscaping. Species
selection is typically mixed and of lower scale. Moderate landscaping within lots north of Kororoit Creek, expands
canopy tree coverage from the creek line into the private realm and adjoining streets. Contemporary development
typically results in increased site coverage, building bulk and development to the property line. This reduces
opportunities for landscaping within the private realm.
The creek line, rail line and Ballarat Road run east-west across the suburb. This creates pockets of residential
areas with similar characteristics or features. High levels of canopy coverage, moderate front setbacks and
homogenous building styles are typical in areas north of Kororoit Creek and immediately to the south of the creek
line.
Contemporary development is a dominant feature of the area between Ballarat Road and the rail line. Traditional
housing stock is typically retained and an additional dwelling is constructed on the lot creating a dual occupancy
dwelling. In other examples the traditional house is demolished for the construction of two or three townhouse or
unit typologies. New development south of the rail line have minimal setbacks or landscaping and building styles
are similar to those to the south, in Derrimut. Industrial development flanks residential areas in both the southeast
and southwest.
Observations from the 2019 Neighbourhood Character Study are affirmed in respect to the limited provision of
contemporary townhouse and unit development in proximity to the activity centre.
Educational facilities, local and large scale convenience stores, open space and areas for active recreation
provide a range of services, amenity and infrastructure for residents.
A Special Building Overlay affects properties southwest of Ballarat Road and south of Billingham Road. The
Development Plan Overlay Schedule 17 affects vacant land adjoining the corner of Station Road and Ballarat
Road. Various Heritage Overlays protect dwellings. Heritage buildings are particularly concentrated in areas
adjoining Ballarat Road in the centre of the suburb.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Deciduous trees and olive trees planted along streets and within the private
realm contribute to a sense of place.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Greater canopy coverage and street tree provision in the north
•
Street layout:
Maintained and wide streetscapes create a spacious setting.
•
Consistency of siting, setbacks and site coverage:
Contemporary development typically respects existing
front setbacks.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Muted and complementary dwelling façade colour
selection.
Threats
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Reduced landscaping as a result of contemporary development.
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Dominance of car access and parking within side and front
setbacks.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Increased site coverage and impervious surfaces as a result of contemporary
development.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Reduced side setbacks and boundary to boundary development.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
667 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 7: Deer Park Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Dwellings typically front key bounding roads and are accessed directly or via
service lanes.
•
Varied residential interfaces with industrial land uses in the east.
•
Residential areas in the south (i.e., south of the train line) provide back of fence
treatments to Mount Derrimut Road and Robinsons Road.
•
Direct residential interface to industrial development and industrial zoned land in
the northeast.
•
Back of fence treatments to Kororoit Creek in the south and frontage to Kororoit
Creek in the north along Milbank Drive.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Varied street tree provision.
•
Increased frequencies of street trees in the south.
•
Very limited street trees between Ballarat Road and the rail line.
•
Species often include deciduous trees and olive trees.
•
Established trees more common adjoining Kororoit Creek in the north.
•
Varied front garden landscaping, typically minimal scale with lawn and low rise
planting.
•
Private landscaping particularly impacted by vehicle parking in the south.
•
Increased open space provision in the south.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
A mixture of grid and curvilinear street networks.
•
Limited instances of dead-end styles and court bowls.
•
Extended nature strip along Hamilton Street.
•
Street network varies between different residential zones.
•
Wide streets particularly in the north and north of the rail line.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Traditional housing stock typically includes moderate to generous front setbacks.
•
Contemporary development typically includes minimal to moderate front
setbacks.
•
Varied side setbacks. Side setbacks are minimal as part of increased site
coverage and building scale.
•
Contemporary development includes minimal side setbacks.
•
Development south of rail line typically built to the property line on both sides.
•
Traditional housing stock utilises a side setback to achieve access to an
additional dwelling at the rear (dual occupancy dwelling).
•
Varied levels of site coverage that increase in the south and as a result of
contemporary and dual occupancy development.
•
Setbacks are typically uniform along the streets. Contemporary development
typically respects existing front setback alignment.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise, predominately single storey detached dwellings.
•
Contemporary development in the south with predominately single storey
detached dwellings. Several townhouse and unit typologies.
•
Emerging double storey townhouse typologies.
•
Townhouse, unit, and dual occupancy typologies increasing throughout.
•
Subdivision of larger lots for contemporary development in the north.
•
Dual occupancy and 2–3 units on a lot are common in particular north of the rail
line and east of Station Road.
Example: Doherty Street and Glencairn Avenue.
Lot size
•
Varied lot sizes.
•
Predominantly 500–650 sqm.
•
Some instances of 650–800 sqm.
•
Development densities increase in the south.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
668 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Front fencing is common. Typically low to medium in height and permeable.
•
Fences are often ‘pool style’ or brick with/without ornate metal.
•
Brick dwellings typically feature brick fencing in the same colour.
•
Medium to high front fences with moderate permeability are common along key
streets in central areas.
•
Variety of fencing materials and colours in central areas and higher instances of
timber picket fences.
•
Predominately no front fences south of the rail line.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Predominately single vehicle crossovers.
•
Mix of carports and garages.
•
Garages are typically built to the side property boundary in the south.
•
Garages are typically integrated with the built form in line with, or set back from,
the dwelling façade.
•
Front setbacks are typically used for additional vehicle parking which impacts on
landscaping.
•
Traditional housing stock to the north typically features driveways along the full
side setback.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Late 1950s – 1980s development around Hogan Street
•
1980s era north of the rail line.
•
Predominately 1990s to 2000s era south of the rail line.
•
Contemporary development scattered throughout northern areas.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Varied architectural styles.
•
Typically brick materials in brown and cream brick.
•
Emerging rendered finishes and varied coloured brick, typically as part of
contemporary development or renovation of the traditional dwelling.
•
Weatherboard materials are common north of Kororoit Creek.
•
Heritage protected weatherboard dwellings along Hyde Street.
•
Varied dwelling maintenance which decreases north of Ballarat Road.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip roof styles.
•
Dutch and gable roof styles are common.
•
Tile in dark grey or terracotta colours is a key material across all roof styles.
•
Eaves are common on both single and double storey dwellings and as part of
contemporary development.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Footpaths typically on both sides of the street.
•
Shared path provision along Byrne Street, connecting to Deer Park Station.
•
Shared path provision along Kororoit Creek with links to the street network.
•
Pedestrian connection over the rail line is restricted to Robinsons and Station
Road.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
669 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Delahey
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 27: Delahey - (Left) Established street trees along Kurrajong Road. (Centre) Typical dwellings in the south-west.
(Right) consistent dwelling setbacks along Goldsmith Avenue.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
670 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Homogenous housing typologies that are predominately single storey detached dwellings. Revitalisation and
renovation of dwellings by property owners is evident throughout the suburb. Dwellings feature highly articulated
facades with large open windows and are predominately constructed of brick materials in varied colours
Buildings have similar architectural styles, roof styles and colour selection
.
Shorter streets and dead-ends result in an unconventional grid street network. Streetscapes are narrower in width
and often lack footpaths. Limited front fence treatment often allows for additional vehicle parking within the front
setback and nature strip. Established street trees that provide canopy coverage are visible throughout the suburb.
Back of fence treatments along all three bounding roads separate residential areas from adjoining suburbs.
Connectivity to Taylors Hill (Melton City Council) in the west is limited to major roads and a single local
connection at Silvertree Avenue.
The suburb is serviced by two small local convenience centres in the south and a range of education facilities and
open space reserves. An aged care facility, accessed from Taylors Road, sits separately from adjoining
residential areas.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Canopy trees and established street trees create shaded streets.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Similar architectural styles and colours contribute to
uniform streetscapes.
•
Low to moderate height front fencing:
Low to moderate scale fencing
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Maintained front gardens and public open space.
Threats
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Dominance of areas used for additional vehicle parking within front
setbacks.
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Minimal private realm landscaping.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 8: Delahey Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Back of fence treatments to both Hume and Taylors Road.
•
Back of fence treatments on both sides of Kings Road.
•
Expansive grasslands in the east, which disconnect the suburb from Keilor
Downs.
•
Isolated residential area east of Kings Road.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Varied levels of canopy tree coverage and street tree provision.
•
Frequent established street trees.
•
Minimal landscaping which is impacted upon by driveways and vehicle parking.
•
Varied species selection within private realm.
•
Gravel is often used in replacement of lawn and nature strips to allow for
additional vehicle parking.
•
Hedging common within front landscaping and adjoining side boundary.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Unconventional grid based street network.
•
Some instances of dead-end style roads, often achieving pedestrian through
connections.
•
Dead-end style treatments along western boundary.
•
Wide local connector roads.
Example: Copperfield Drive and Goldsmith Avenue.
•
Narrow local roads, dead-end roads and courts.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
671 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Dwellings predominately with minimal side setbacks.
•
Limited instances of side setbacks achieving vehicle access or parking.
•
Instances of no setback with dwelling built to both property boundary.
•
Increased site coverage.
•
Moderate front setbacks.
•
Minimal front setbacks often a result of increased site coverage.
•
Front setbacks vary in consistency and uniformity. Some streets have uniform
setbacks. Others have a greater variation.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise, predominately single storey dwellings.
•
Double storey typically achieved as part of contemporary development.
•
Limited typology variation. Limited instances of townhouse or unit developments.
•
Double storey unit development to the east of Kings Road.
Lot size
•
Varied lot sizes.
•
300–650sqm in the north, north of Goldsmith Avenue.
•
Predominately 650–800sqm in the south.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Predominately no front fences.
•
Some instances of metal ‘pool style’ fencing in light colours.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Predominately single crossovers.
•
Garages typically integrated with built form in line with front façades.
•
Additional vehicle parking typically within front setback rather than on-street.
Architectural Styles and Roof
Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately 1990s to 2000s.
•
Very limited instances of contemporary development.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Predominately brick dwellings in orange and cream colours.
•
Rendered dwellings typically in cream and grey tones.
•
Brick dwellings typically of good quality.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip style roofs.
•
Variety of roof colours, typically terracotta, grey or brown. Tile a key material.
•
Some instances of gable styles.
•
Eaves are common on dwellings.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Notable
Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Limited pedestrian path provision.
•
Pedestrian paths typically provided on through roads only.
•
Pedestrian permeability between dead-end style streets.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
672 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Derrimut
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 28: Derrimut - (Left) Dwellings along Windsor Boulevard. (Centre) Dwellings with minimal front
setback. (Right) Townhouse typologies along Lennon Parkway.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
673 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
A master planned residential precinct with predominately detached dwellings and small pockets of
medium density typologies
.
Single and double storey dwellings feature consistent use of building materials and muted tones. A high level of
site coverage reduces private realm landscaping.
Generous public realm landscaping and natural features provide access and visual connection to open space and
the natural environment, with Mount Derrimut Nature Reserve as a predominate feature in the north. Residential
lots positively address the nature reserve, but accessibility is restricted. Creek lines and waterbodies are
integrated into open space and contribute to a sense of greening and amenity.
Surrounded by industrial development to the south and east and a nature conservation reserve to the west.
Interfaces to non-residential zoned land are often fenced and lack visual and physical connectivity.
The road network is curved with some instances of court bowl/dead-end style road design, often as a result of
intersecting open space or conservation reserves. Wide streets create an open, spacious and uniform network
that allows for pedestrian and cyclist connectivity and amenity.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Similar building materials create consistency
across streets.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Semi-established and uniform street trees paired with a variety of open
space assets create a landscape setting.
•
Street layout:
Connected and wide streetscapes are consistent.
•
Connections to open space:
Dwellings provide sight lines over open space and natural features.
Threats
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Impacts on private realm landscaping as a result of increased site coverage.
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Limited canopy tree provision within the private realm.
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Front setback used for additional vehicle parking.
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
High frequency of on-street car parking that crowds the street.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 9: Derrimut Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Limited interface with adjoining industrial land uses and the Western
Freeway.
•
Direct frontage to Foleys Road provides residential connections to Deer Park.
•
Articulated entrances to the residential areas.
Private & public
realm landscaping
•
Increased site coverage as a result of building bulk which reduces the scale
of private realm landscaping.
•
Minimal landscaping within front gardens.
•
Strong visual and physical connections to local reserves and waterways.
•
Generously landscaped public realm.
•
Uniform and consistent street tree planting throughout.
Street alignment,
type & proportions
•
Curved grid based street network.
•
Limited dead-end road treatments.
•
Streetscapes are of uniform width.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
674 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Increased built form scale results in increased site coverage across all
typologies.
•
Minimal side setbacks and some instances of no side setback with built form
to property boundaries.
•
Minimal front setbacks often with vehicle parking only.
Building types &
height
•
Predominately single and double storey detached dwellings.
•
Low rise apartment style and medium density development opposite
education and commercial land uses.
•
Rear-loaded typologies provide for a positive address to open space and
creek lines in the south.
Lot size
•
Varied lot sizes, typically 300–500sqm in the northwest and 500–650sqm in
the centre and south.
Fencing height,
materiality, finish &
transparency
•
Limited instances of front fencing.
•
Back fence interfaces with industrial areas in the east and south and
adjoining the Western Freeway.
Garages, carports,
crossovers, access
& car parking
•
Garages are a prominent feature of the dwellings, typically integrated with
built form and in line with the front façade.
•
Predominately single crossovers.
•
Front setbacks often used for additional off-street car parking.
Architectural Styles and Roof
Styles
Era of development
•
Predominately 1990s to 2000s development.
Building materiality
& quality
•
Consistent brick and render finish material selection.
•
Rendered finishes often add colour and texture variation to dwellings.
•
Repetitive building material and façade articulation which is reflective of
master planned estates.
•
Roller shutters as an addition to the façade of buildings occurs infrequently.
Roof styles,
materials & colours
•
Consistent dark coloured tiled roofs.
•
Prominent hip style roof styles with some instances of Dutch roof styles.
•
Eaves are common on single storey dwellings.
•
Solar panels on roofs are common.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
High frequency of on-street car parking, which restricts traffic movements.
•
Semi-established street trees and a uniform landscape theme.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
675 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Hillside
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 29: Hillside - (Left) Unit typologies along Padula Court. (Centre) Established canopy trees on Morgan Court.
(Right) Closed roller shutters on a dwelling.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
676 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Predominately single storey detached dwellings with limited vacant sites. Small quantities of townhouse and unit
developments are scattered throughout the suburb. Building styles are similar and feature brick materials and hip
or Dutch roof styles of mixed colours. Lot sizes are varied across the suburb in no particular pattern.
Consistent moderate - generous front setbacks allow for mixed species planting and canopy tree
establishment.
Cyprus and Palm tree species within private realm landscaping contributes to a localised landscape identity and
strong garden setting. A lack of front fencing, narrow streets and limited footpaths further contribute to the garden
setting.
The Brimbank City Council portion of Hillside sits separated from the broader suburb within Melton City Council.
Separation occurs via a narrow drainage reserve along the western edge of the suburb (Brimbank). Three road
connections are provided to Melton. There is limited residential dwelling differences between municipal areas.
Residential development is controlled by a singular residential zone across the portion of the suburb within
Brimbank and adjoining area of Melton. Open space is provided within linear drainage reserves, with a formalised
play space at Hillside Reserve in the south. Sydenham Reservoir is visible from most parts of the suburb.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Similar building materials and colour selection
creates consistency.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Moderate to generous front setbacks allow space for landscaping and
contribute to a garden setting.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Varied species of street tree planting creates canopy coverage and
shaded streets.
•
Low to moderate height front fencing
: Little to no front fencing contributes to more spacious streets.
Threats
•
Limited connectivity or accessibility:
Broader suburb area falls within another municipality.
•
Limited connectivity or accessibility:
Street network creates a series of dead-end style treatments
limiting access and connection through the suburb.
•
Limited connectivity or accessibility:
Lack of footpaths on some streets restricts pedestrian access
and movement.
•
Change in materiality or style:
Dominance of roller shutters reduces passive surveillance and detracts
from the overall architectural style of dwellings.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 10: Hillside Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Drainage reserve provides separation between residential development to the
west.
•
Limited boundary or separation between Hillside (Brimbank) and residential land
to the south (outside of the municipality).
•
Back of fence treatment to drainage reserve and adjoining municipality along
western edge.
•
No direct residential frontage to Melton Highway in the north.
•
Limited access off Calder Park Drive into the suburb.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Varied species street tree planting.
•
Established tree planting in keeping with Sydenham to the east.
•
Palm and Cyprus tree species within private realm landscaping.
Example:
Community Hub.
•
Moderate landscaping within front gardens.
•
Front gardens are well-maintained and formally planted, often with hedging
along the front and side property boundaries.
•
Established eucalyptus, particularly in road reserves.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
677 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
On-street parking and parking bays throughout.
•
Wide entry streets from Calder Park Drive.
•
Narrow local streets.
•
Limited through road connections. Dead-end/hammer head style end treatments
throughout.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Moderate to generous front setbacks that occur on both sides of the street.
•
Townhouse and unit typologies provide moderate front setbacks, typically
without canopy trees.
Example: Di Berardino Way.
•
Minimal side setbacks are common throughout.
•
Car parking typically achieved within the frontage of the dwelling.
Building types &
height
•
Predominantly single storey detached dwellings.
•
Some instances of single storey townhouse and unit typologies.
Example:
Morgan Court and Padula Court.
Lot size
•
Varied lot sizes across the suburb.
•
Limited pattern to lot size provision.
•
Limited vacant sites.
•
Lots of 800–1000sqm in the south typically associated with the termination of the
street (dead-end).
•
Lots of 650–800sqm typically occur together.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Predominately no front fencing.
•
Side fencing typically ceases in line with front dwelling façades or reduces in
height (medium fencing) at the front property boundary.
•
Hedging or Cyprus species used in replacement of fencing treatments.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Garages are typically integrated with the built form.
•
Carports often provided to the side of the dwelling façade. Typically of Colorbond
steel material.
•
Predominantly single crossovers.
Architectural Styles and Roof
Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately 1990s to 2000s builds.
•
Limited emerging contemporary development or revitalisation of traditional
housing stock.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Predominately brick materials in orange, cream and red colours.
•
Roller shutters evident throughout.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Mixed roof colours, typically of tile in terracotta, charcoal, red and green colours.
•
Hip and Dutch styles are common.
•
Eaves are common on dwellings.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths typically provided on one side of the street.
•
Pedestrian paths predominately link dead-end streets to one another.
Example:
Chris Court.
•
On-street parking bays throughout.
•
Red brick road surface treatment to local roads.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
678 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Kealba
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 30: Kealba - (Left) Gable roof styles. (Centre) Typical dwelling along Driscolls Road. (Right) Contemporary
development along Rowan Drive.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
679 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
A mix of single and double storey detached dwellings which are typically situated on small to moderate sized lots.
Architectural styles are diverse with greater variety in proximity to the Maribyrnong River.
Building heights and massing also increases in proximity to the Maribyrnong River where dwellings take
advantage of the view lines.
Moderate landscaping of front gardens results in mixed species selection at varying heights. Elevated topography
adjoining the escarpment to Maribyrnong River provides views to the Melbourne CBD. A curvilinear street network
with wide streetscapes contributes to an overall spacious setting.
The suburb is largely residential, with a small portion of industrial land associated with Boral Landfill situated in
the south. There are limited vacant sites and contemporary development outcomes. Maribyrnong River bounds
the full eastern edge of the suburb. The Western Ring Road adjoins the southern boundary and provides access
to Melbourne Airport, Calder Freeway and Melbourne more broadly.
Serviced by local convenience shops, education and recreation facilities. A Development Plan Overlay affects the
former school site along Driscolls Road. The Melbourne Airport Environs Overlay affects land in the south eastern
corner.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Connections to open space:
Visual and physical connection to open space and natural assets.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Building styles, roof forms are consistent
•
Consistency of building height:
heights are single storey.
•
Connections to open space:
View lines to both the Maribyrnong River and Melbourne CBD.
Threats
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Double crossovers which are dominant along the interface to
Maribyrnong River.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Contemporary development increases site coverage and scale.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 11: Kealba Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Maribyrnong River bounds the full eastern edge of the suburb.
•
Topographic height in the east with escarpment to Maribyrnong River.
•
Residential address to Sunshine Avenue and Green Gully Road.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Moderate landscaped front gardens with lawn.
•
Front garden landscaping of properties adjoining the Maribyrnong River often
impacted upon by double crossovers and additional vehicle parking.
•
Varied street tree provision.
•
Often only one or two established trees within the street.
•
Established street trees are common in central medians of court bowls.
Example:
Elstree Court.
•
Recently planted deciduous street trees will increase canopy coverage in the
future.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Residential access via Service Road along Green Gully Road and Sunshine
Avenue.
•
Wide streetscapes contribute to a spacious setting.
•
Curvilinear street network.
•
Court bowls often feature central medians.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
680 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Moderate to generous side setbacks achieve car parking or access to a
garage/carport or the rear of property and contain landscaping.
•
Generous front setbacks on both sides of the street.
•
Contemporary development along Rowan Drive and Monarma Walk have
minimal front and side setbacks.
•
Front setbacks of properties that address the Maribyrnong River are typically
used for additional vehicle parking.
•
Increased site coverage associated with lots that address the Maribyrnong River.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise predominately single storey detached dwellings.
•
Townhouse or attached dwelling typologies are not common and occur in an
isolated area adjoining Rowan Drive.
•
Some double storey detached dwellings scattered throughout the suburb.
•
Dwellings along Orbital and Rowan Drive are typically double storey.
Lot size
•
Predominately 500–650sqm lots.
•
Some 300–500sqm in the northeast adjoining the Maribyrnong River.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Front fencing is common, typically low to moderate in height with moderate
levels of permeability.
•
Front fences increase in occurrence along main local roads.
Example: Driscolls
Road.
•
Front fences are more permeable away from main roads and within court bowls.
Fencing materials are typically brick or metal ‘pool style’ with timber feature
panelling.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Single or double garages are common.
•
Garages integrate with the built form as part of brick dwellings.
•
Carports often achieved as an add-on to the original dwelling.
•
Predominately single crossovers with double crossovers more common on lots
addressing the Maribyrnong River.
•
Dedicated lanes for on-street car parking along Driscolls Road.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately 1980s era with very limited contemporary development outcomes.
•
Limited contemporary development to the southeast (Orbital Drive) and east.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Brick veneer typically of red, orange and cream colours.
•
Limited use of render, typically in grey tones.
•
Diverse architectural styles more prominent in larger scale double storey
dwellings.
•
Varying building maintenance along Orbital Drive.
•
Brick dwellings largely of good quality.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately tiled hip and gable roof styles.
•
Terracotta and grey tile materials throughout.
•
Gable roof styles often associated with double storey dwellings.
•
Garages and carports predominately flat or hip roof styles.
•
Limited emerging roof styles throughout the suburb.
•
Eaves are common as part of both single and double storey dwellings.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
681 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths on both sides of the street connect to open space and broader
street network.
•
Pedestrian paths along residential side of road interface with the Maribyrnong
River.
•
Limited pedestrian connections down the escarpment.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
682 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Keilor
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 31: Keilor - (Left) Dwelling with double crossover. (Centre) Generous front setback along Feathertop Drive.
(Right) Contemporary development along Patterson Avenue.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
683 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
A green and spacious setting achieved by street tree planting and generous private realm landscaping. Large
canopy streets, varied species selection and expanses of lawn are contained in well-maintained front garden
landscaping.
Dwellings typically follow the slope of the land and result in varied building levels and address the street.
Residential areas are characterised by large dwellings that are generally highly articulated with large
windows which capture views to the surrounding natural environment.
Infill development appears to be concentrated around Patterson Avenue, where it achieves varied integration with
the street and traditional housing stock. Renovation and redevelopment of detached dwellings is evident
throughout the suburb, particularly adjoining Keilor Village Shopping Precinct.
Key connector roads separate residential areas from each other. Keilor is surrounded by Taylors Creek, the
Maribyrnong River and adjoining parklands which creates strong physical and visual links to the natural
environment. There is mixed interface and access to natural features as a result of topographic variation.
Keilor Village Shopping Precinct is enclosed by undulating topography, particularly northeast and southwest.
Several local open spaces and two education facilities are located within the suburb. A large scale aged care
facility is accessed from Old Calder Highway. The aged care facility is largely screened by adjoining residential
development. Abuttal to the Calder Freeway results in a number of irregular triangle style lots with a limited
interface with the street
The area is predominately affected by the Melbourne Airport Environs Overlay. A Special Building Overlay and
Design and Development Overlay affect residential land abutting Keilor Village Shopping Precinct. A small area is
affected by a Development Plan Overlay adjoining Green Gully Road. Heritage dwellings are scattered in lower
areas adjoining Keilor Village Shopping Precinct and Old Calder Highway. A Significant Landscape Overlay
covers the Old Calder Highway and adjoining open space reserves.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Consistency of siting, setbacks and site coverage:
Contemporary development provides front and side
setbacks in keeping with traditional housing stock.
•
Connections to open space:
Wide landscape setting creates views to natural assets and Keilor Village.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Private front gardens contribute to a landscape setting.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Articulated façades with large windows and high
quality materials and finishes.
Threats
•
Limited connectivity or accessibility:
Back of fence treatments to Taylors Creek and Maribyrnong River
limit active interface and address.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Increased site coverage with large driveways and areas of impervious surfaces.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Larger lots are often subdivided as part of contemporary infill development.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Contemporary development often achieves increased visual bulk to the street and
natural environment as a result of vegetation removal and limited landscaping.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
684 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 12: Keilor Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Green Gully Road dissects the centre of the suburb. Service road provides lot
access and frontage.
•
Taylors Creek and the Maribyrnong River provide natural boundaries along the
south and east.
•
Significant topographic variation.
•
Residential areas adjoin the local activity centre.
•
Back of fence treatments are typical to open space reserves.
•
Calder Freeway separates residential and Green Wedge Zoned land.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Street planting on most streets with varying levels of canopy tree coverage.
•
Mixed street tree species selection.
•
Established trees within central medians of court bowls.
Example: Huon Court.
•
Moderate to generous front garden landscaping typically containing areas of
lawn and formalised garden beds.
•
Canopy trees within front and rear landscaping. Established trees within some
front gardens.
Example: Petrik Drive, Arabin Street and Feathertop Street.
•
Well-maintained nature strips and front gardens.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Curvilinear road network with key links to Green Gully Road and Old Calder
Highway.
•
Topographic variation results in dead-end style treatments and long block
lengths.
•
Pedestrian paths on both sides of the street, connecting to open space and the
broader street network.
•
Wide streets consistent throughout the suburb. Example:
Petrik Drive.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Moderate to generous front setbacks.
•
Moderate side setbacks provide vehicle parking or access to garages/carports.
•
Minimal side setbacks typical for small lot sizes west of Green Gully Road.
•
Generous setbacks to the south of the activity centre, typically associated with
topographic variation.
•
Contemporary development retains existing street setbacks.
Example: Patterson
Avenue.
•
Dwellings typically achieve increased site coverage and building bulk.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise predominately single and double storey detached dwellings.
•
Predominately double storey dwellings along Church Street.
•
Taller building heights would likely obscure existing views to tree tops and open
space.
Lot size
•
Predominately 500–650sqm lots to the south.
•
Larger lots of 1000sqm in the northwest, centre and northeast.
•
Reduced lot sizes as a result of contemporary development around Patterson
Avenue.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Varied instances of front fencing. Areas in the southwest have limited front
fencing outcomes.
•
Front fencing is often moderate to high in scale in brick materials with ornate
metal details.
•
Some instances of timber and ‘pool style’ front fences.
•
Fencing height increases and permeability decreases adjoining Old Calder
Highway.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
685 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Garages typically integrated with the built form.
•
Carports typically occur as part of dwellings west of Green Gully Road.
•
A mixture of single and double crossovers. Double crossovers typically achieved
as part of larger lots.
•
Crossovers impact on street trees and nature strips.
Example: Watson Rise.
•
Attached double garages are a prominent feature, located in line with or in front
of dwelling façades.
•
Driveways are a prominent feature and often achieve parking for multiple
vehicles.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Varied eras of development.
•
1990s era in the north.
•
1980s to 2000s era in central areas.
•
1970s era and more recent contemporary development along Patterson Avenue.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Architectural styles vary from brick veneer to contemporary brick.
•
Predominately orange and brown brick colours.
•
Light coloured timber materials typically used in contemporary development.
•
Some historical architectural allusions.
•
Topographic variation affects architectural styles and building form.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip and gable roof styles in dark and terracotta tiles.
•
Integrated garages and carports typically with flat or hip roof styles.
•
Eaves are common and as part of more recent development.
•
Solar panels on roofs are common.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths on both sides of the street, connecting to open space and the
street network.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
686 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Keilor Downs
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 32: Keilor Downs - (Left) Spacious streets north of Copernicus Way. (Centre) Contemporary infill development
north of the shopping centre. (Left) Palm trees within the private realm and generous front landscaping.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
687 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Housing typologies are similar, predominately single and double storey detached dwellings. Building styles are
reflective of development from the late 1970s and 2000s. Revitalisation and renovation to older building styles by
property owners throughout the suburb.
Characterised by dwellings on moderate to large lots with generally well-established and maintained front
gardens.
Established palm trees are visible across the suburb. Dwellings typically feature highly articulated facades with
large windows. There is an eclectic mix of architectural styles ranging from brick veneer to rendered brick,
concrete, and some instances of brick and timber board facades.
The road network includes curved roads with footpaths on both sides. Shorter streets and cul-de-sacs are
typically narrower in width and often lack footpaths. Prominent fencing along key streets usually tapers off as part
of the finer grain road network. This contributes to an overall spacious garden setting.
Keilor Downs is host to Keilor Central Shopping Centre, Brimbank Aquatic and Wellness Centre, and several
schools, churches, and local parks, the suburb provides a range of service, leisure and convenience assets for
the community. Green Gully Reserve provides a substantial active open space asset. The Keilor Shopping Centre
and surrounding land parcels to the north are covered by an Urban Design Framework and Development Plan
Overlay (Schedule 2). A Heritage Overlay affects a residential property along Taylors Road.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Integrated infill development
Contemporary development around Keilor Central Shopping Centre
creates a new pocket of medium density townhouse typologies that diversifies both residential and mixed
use development.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Canopy tree coverage contributes to a garden setting.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Sense of spaciousness as a result of private realm landscaping in front,
side and rear setbacks.
•
Street layout:
Curved road network creates a local neighbourhood feel.
Threats
•
High fencing:
High impermeable fencing creates a poor residential interface with Taylors Road and
Sunshine Avenue.
•
Change in materiality or style:
Roller shutter treatments over windows reduce connection and visual
permeability with the street.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Scale and siting of infill development is inconsistent with traditional housing
stock.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
688 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 13: Keilor Downs Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations, transitions &
boundaries
•
New medium density townhouse development north of Keilor
Central, which is unique to the suburb.
•
Limited residential active interface to the rail line or pedestrian
connectivity.
•
Limited dwelling style, height and setback variation between Keilor
Downs and Keilor Lodge along Lady Nelson Way.
•
Limited active address to Taylors Road, Green Gully Reserve, the
leisure centre or Keilor Central Shopping Centre.
•
Limited active frontage to Sunshine Avenue with limited pedestrian
connectivity and accessibility.
Private & public realm
landscaping
•
Generous front and rear gardens.
•
Palm trees are an identifiable feature of the street and private
gardens.
•
Vegetable gardens frequently feature in front setbacks.
Street alignment, type &
proportions
•
Curvilinear street layout with cul-de-sac pattern.
•
Short streets and court bowls that are narrow in width.
•
Spacious main roads.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site coverage
•
Generous front setbacks are consistent on both sides of the road.
•
Generous backyards that often contain garages and sheds.
•
Side setbacks with minimal landscaping.
Building types & height
•
Predominantly single and double storey dwellings.
•
Medium density townhouse typology around Keilor Central
Shopping Centre (three storey height).
Lot size
•
Moderate to large lots, generally 650–1000sqm.
•
Unit developments occur throughout; typically 2–3 unit outcomes.
Fencing height, materiality,
finish & transparency
•
Limited instances of front fencing.
•
Rare instances of medium height fencing, typically of brick and/or
ornate metal material.
•
Colorbond steel high fencing along the side and rear of dwellings,
typically cream and light green in colour.
Garages, carports,
crossovers, access & car
parking
•
Garages often integrated with built form and aligned with front
building façade.
•
Generous width driveways provide for additional off-street car
parking.
•
Single crossovers.
Architectural Styles and
Roof Styles
Era of development
•
Late 1970 to 1980s era development.
•
Emerging new 2000s and more recent development in the
immediate vicinity of Keilor Central Shopping Centre.
Building materiality & quality
•
Variety of brick in brown, orange and cream colours.
•
Render and concrete materials in contemporary developments,
typically grey and white in colour.
•
Highly articulated facades with large windows and positive
address to street frontage.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
689 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Roller shutter treatment on front and side windows.
Roof styles, materials &
colours
•
Predominantly tiled hipped, gable roofs; a small number of Dutch
roof styles.
•
Mixed roofing materials and colours, largely terracotta and black
tile.
•
Eaves are common as part of traditional single storey dwellings.
•
Limited instances of solar panels.
Notable Features
Details of the footpath & street
•
Landscaping is present to the street edge.
•
Short streets and court bowls often lack footpaths on both sides.
•
Mixed street trees with frequency of street tree planting increasing
in the north.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
690 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Keilor Lodge
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 33: Keilor Lodge - (Left) Dominant front garages and canopy trees within the private realm. (Centre) Diverse
building styles. (Right) Generous front gardens.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
691 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Predominately homogenous housing typologies that are predominately single and double storey detached
dwellings. Buildings feature brick and rendered materials, large expansive windows and articulated facades.
Wide streets with well-maintained nature strips and adjoining moderate scale front landscaping creates a
spacious garden setting.
Characterised by larger dwellings on moderate to large lots, there are limited examples of infill development. A
small quantity of townhouse typologies within Santa Monica Drive achieve building styles, material selection and
setbacks in keeping with adjoining detached dwellings.
Pedestrian paths are achieved along key local roads but are limited as part of dead-end streets. Pedestrian
connectivity between dead-end streets is achieved via access lanes that connect through to open space. Limited
footpath provision extends lawns and gardens to the roadway, accentuating the width of the streetscape.
Large scale residential development on corner lots often results in address to both streets and crossovers on both
streets which provide front and side vehicle access. Corner dwellings often achieve access to rear garages or
private open space from both streets.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Street Layout:
Wide road widths contribute to a spacious landscape setting.
•
Street Layout:
Garages and carports provide ample opportunity for off-street vehicle parking, reducing on
street parking and accentuating the streetscape width.
•
Connections to open space:
Pedestrian connections between dead-end roads create a walkable
neighbourhood with strong links to public open space.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Landscaping and canopy tree provision within private open space contributes
to the streetscape.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Good quality and well-maintained dwellings.
Threats
•
Limited connectivity or accessibility:
Limited pedestrian paths on local roads reduces connectivity and
pedestrian safety.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Increased building bulk and scale increases site coverage and areas of
impervious surfaces.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 14: Keilor Lodge Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Calder Freeway provides a hard boundary to Keilor North.
•
Melton Highway extends the length of the suburb's southern boundary.
•
Back of fence treatment to Sunshine Avenue. Sunshine Avenue divides the
suburb.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Varied levels and species selection of street trees.
•
Established canopy trees are limited across the suburb.
•
Moderate front garden landscaping outcomes, typically formalised garden beds
with low level shrubs, a canopy tree and an expansive lawn.
Street alignment,
type proportions
•
Curvilinear dead-end style street network.
•
Pedestrian connections provided between dead-end roads.
•
Wide road widths with limited pedestrian paths.
•
Pedestrian paths provided on main local roads only.
Built
Form
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Varied but generous front setbacks.
•
Limited pattern or uniformity to dwelling setbacks within the street.
•
Typically minimal side setbacks due to increased building bulk.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
692 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Some instances of moderate setbacks achieving vehicle parking.
•
Instances of walls to boundaries, typically a result of increased bulk form bulk
and scale.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise, mix of single and double storey detached dwellings.
•
Double storey dwellings are more dominant on larger lot sizes, particularly
adjoining the Calder Freeway.
•
Limited townhouse typologies, limited provision on Santa Monica Drive.
Lot size
•
Predominately 650–800sqm lots.
•
Lots greater than 1000sqm adjoining the Calder Freeway
. Example: Nordic
Avenue.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Limited front fencing.
•
Infrequent low scale permeable fencing typically used as edging to a formalised
garden.
•
Hedging often used to separate gardens from the footpath/street.
•
Some instances of medium scale permeable orange brick fencing with ornate
metal details on larger lots.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
A mixture of single and double crossovers.
•
Dual crossovers achieve loop driveways or access to multiple garages.
•
Side setbacks often achieve vehicle parking.
•
Townhouses and units achieve access via single or double crossovers.
•
Garages do not dominate the building façade.
Architectural Styles and Roof
Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately 1990s to 2000s builds.
•
Limited contemporary infill development.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Predominately brick dwellings of orange and cream colours.
•
Concrete and rendered dwellings typically in cream and grey tones.
•
High levels of building quality and maintenance.
•
Mixed architectural styles and massing.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip roof style with terracotta and dark tile material.
•
Mixture of other roof styles including gable, dutch, flat and shed styles.
•
Eaves are common in dwellings even with varied roof styles.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths typically on a single side of the street.
•
Pedestrian paths on both sides of the street on main roads.
Example: Verona
Drive.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
693 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Keilor Park
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 34: Keilor Park – (Left) Typical dwelling with roller shutters limiting passive surveillance of the street. (Centre)
Dwellings adjoining the creek line. (Right) Contemporary development next to traditional housing stock.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
694 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Predominately single detached dwellings with emerging double storey contemporary redevelopment and
townhouse typologies. Contemporary infill development in the form of townhouses and units is scattered
throughout and found at greater instances immediately north of Fullarton Road. Infill development varies dwelling
siting and material palettes of traditional housing stock.
Residential development is isolated from adjoining residential areas as a result of abutting industrial
development and major road infrastructure.
Steele Creek creates a natural separation between residential and industrial zones. Abutting industrial
development, road infrastructure and the creek corridor contributes to a sense of containment and enclosure of
the residential area.
Detached dwellings are typically situated on small to moderate size lots with varied levels of planting and species
selection within front garden landscaping. Topography variation in the north results in higher instances of
retaining walls and fence treatments to the street. There is limited address to Steele Creek and the linear creek
corridor in the north.
The suburb is serviced by local convenience shops and recreation provision. Limited connectivity is provided to
Keilor Recreation Reserve in the west. An Environmental Audit Overlay covers a single property adjoining
Fullarton Road. The Melbourne Airport Environs Overlay affects properties in the south-west.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Consistent brick materials in cream and orange
colours.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Tidy private gardens and well-maintained nature strips.
•
Low to moderate height front fencing:
Permeable and low front fences.
•
Street layout:
Grid based road network with strong local pedestrian connections.
Threats
•
High fencing:
Large solid fencing which disrupts the rhythm of the street.
•
Limited connectivity or accessibility:
Poor accessibility to adjoining residential areas and Brimbank more
broadly.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Bulky units with minimal setbacks that are not in keeping with the surrounding
spacious residential area.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 15: Keilor Park Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Back of fence interface along full interface with Keilor Park Drive.
•
Fullarton Road separates residential land and the Calder Freeway.
•
Creek line and varied topography separates residential land and industrial uses.
•
Back of fence interface to Western Ring Road.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Varied levels of street planting. Streets trees occur on most streets.
•
Limited canopy tree coverage.
•
Large established trees adjoin Keilor Park Preschool.
•
Established trees often form part of front landscaping.
•
Minimal to moderate front landscaping typically with expanses of lawn and low
rise planting.
•
Minimal landscaping predominately associated with townhouse typologies.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
695 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Unconventional grid based street network.
•
Dead-end style treatments abut Keilor Park Drive and Western Ring Road.
•
Limited instances of courts with a central median.
•
Wide streets allow for vehicle parking on both sides.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Traditional housing stock with moderate front setbacks.
•
Contemporary development and townhouse typologies with minimal front
setbacks.
•
Generous front setbacks in the north typically a result of topographic influence
on building siting.
•
Instances of dwellings set back on an angle from the street.
Example
:
Fosters
Road
.
•
Minimal to moderate side setbacks sometimes achieving vehicle parking or
access.
•
Some instances of walls on boundaries.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise, typically single storey detached dwellings.
•
Double storey dwellings typically townhouse typologies or contemporary
development.
•
Older style unit typologies in the north along Fosters Road.
•
Emerging contemporary infill development with townhouse typologies, typically
1–2 on a lot.
Lot size
•
Predominately 500–650sqm and 650–800sqm lots.
•
Lots under 400sqm and lots above 650sqm are limited.
•
Lots less than 300sqm are typical of infill development.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Low to moderate height permeable fencing is common. Typically brick in material
with ornate metal details.
•
Limited high fences with reduced permeability in the northeast, typically orange
and brown in colour.
•
Stone retaining walls exist on lots towards Steele Creek.
•
Side fencing is a prominent feature on corner lots.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Side setbacks typically provide garages and carports.
•
Predominately single crossovers.
•
Garages are typically integrated with the built form.
•
Townhouses and units achieve access via shared driveways and common
property.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominantly 1970s and 1980s era.
•
Emerging contemporary infill development, particularly in the south.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Brick dwellings typically of orange and cream colours.
•
Traditional housing stock achieves consistent styles and materiality.
•
Slope responsive development towards Steele Creek.
•
Mixed building materials adjoining Fullarton Road.
•
Roller shutters are evident throughout.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip style roofs with dark/grey tile.
•
Contemporary developments retain hip roof styles.
•
Garages/carports often achieve flat roof styles.
•
Eaves are common on dwellings.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
696 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths on both sides of the streets.
•
Streetscapes are uniform throughout the suburb
•
Limited pedestrian connectivity to residential development to the south and to
the recreation reserve in the northwest.
Kings Park
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 35: Kings Park - (Left) Typical dwelling with moderate front setback and roller shutters on front windows. (Centre)
Moderate fencing in brick material. (Right) Front setbacks used for additional car parking.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
697 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Building styles are predominately consistent and achieve similar architectural styles, roof styles and colour
selection. Housing typologies are typically single storey detached dwellings.
Moderate front setbacks, low scale building heights and wide streets create a spacious setting.
Predominately brick dwellings in varied colours. Dwellings feature large open windows, often with roller shutters.
Revitalisation and renovation by property owners is evident and typically introduces rendered finishes. Dwellings
feature similar architectural styles, scale and roof styles as the adjoining suburb of Delahey.
A varied street network with dead-end and court bowl style treatments. Streetscapes often lack footpaths. Front
setbacks are frequently used for additional vehicle parking, which limits landscaping scale and species variation.
The suburb is predominately residential with very limited vacant sites or areas undergoing change or transition. A
small convenience centre, a range of education facilities and a series of open space reserves provide land use
variation and amenity to residents.
A Special Building Overlay affects land in the north. An Environmental Significance Overlay protects a waterway
corridor in the west and an open space reserve in the south-eastern corner.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Similar architectural styles, colours and material
palette creates visual consistency across the suburb.
•
Consistency of siting, setbacks and site coverage:
Detached dwellings create breaks between built form
and moderate setbacks which contribute to a low scale and spacious setting.
•
Street layout:
Wide streets create a spacious setting.
Threats
•
High fencing:
Dominant fencing styles with reduced permeability.
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Dominant areas within front setbacks which are used for additional
vehicle parking.
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Limited variation in private realm species selection or canopy tree provision.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 16: Kings Park Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Residential frontage to Taylors Road, Kings Road and Main Road West.
•
Back of fence interface to Burnside Heights. No through vehicle connections and
limited pedestrian connections.
•
Back of fence interface and limited connectivity to Kororoit Creek and the linear
drainage reserve in the southwest.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Limited street tree provision.
•
Established street trees are typically the only street trees.
•
Minimal front garden planting, typically only lawn with some low rise planting.
•
Sparse street trees with no consistent theme for planting when street tree
planting does occur.
•
Landscaping and species variation often impacted upon by driveways and
vehicle parking.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Varied street network. Some instances of unconventional grid network.
•
Dead-end style roads and court bowls are typical.
•
Wide streets.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
698 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Curved streets create larger irregular shaped lots, particularly as part of a dead
end stye roads.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Minimal - moderate side setbacks often with vehicle parking or access.
•
Minimal side setbacks typically a result of irregular and narrow style lots.
•
Moderate to generous scale front setbacks.
•
Varied site coverage.
•
Consistent setbacks along the street.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise, predominately single storey detached dwellings.
•
Limited townhouse typologies throughout. Example:
Taylors Road.
•
Older style duplex units and dual occupancy typologies in the south adjoining
Nariel Road.
Lot size
•
Predominately 500–600sqm.
•
Irregular shaped lots and lots adjoining Kororoit Creek typically larger.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Front fences are common.
•
Fencing is typically medium height and permeable.
•
Some instances of reduced permeability, particularly along key roads.
•
Fencing materials vary. Brick, timber and Colorbond materials are common.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Predominately single crossovers.
•
Side setbacks provide vehicle parking and often access to the rear of properties.
•
Carports are more common than integrated garages.
•
Carports are often deep, providing multi-vehicle parking.
•
Front setbacks are typically used for additional vehicle parking.
Architectural Styles and Roof
Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately 1980s to 2000s.
•
Limited contemporary or infill development.
•
Evident revitalisation of older properties.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Predominately brick dwellings in orange and cream colours.
•
Rendered dwellings typically in cream and grey tones.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip style roofs.
•
Variety of roof colours, typically terracotta, grey or brown. Tile a key material.
•
Some instances of gable styles.
•
Eaves are typical as part of dwellings.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths provided on most streets.
•
Pedestrian paths in the north limited to key local roads only.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
699 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
St Albans
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 36: St Albans - (Left) Traditional Housing Stock with pool style fence. (Centre). Contemporary development in the
south-west adjoining McKechnie Street. (Right) Attached townhouse typologies.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
700 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Mixture of traditional housing stock and more contemporary development. Townhouse and unit developments are
scattered throughout and found at greater instances in proximity to the St Albans Activity Centre. Various small
scale and larger vacant sites exist. Larger sites often achieve integrated redevelopment outcomes. This is
particularly evident adjoining the Victoria University Campus in the southeast.
Architectural styles are diverse and reflective of the contemporary redevelopment of traditional housing
stock and new infill development.
Traditional housing stock is typically situated on moderately sized lots with varied levels of planting and species
selection within front garden landscaping. Contemporary and infill development typically results in a high level of
site coverage and dwellings built to the property line. Traditional housing stock is typically retained as dual
occupancy or redeveloped into 2–3 new townhouse or unit typologies. There is greater dwelling style and roof
style variation than adjoining suburbs.
A predominately residential suburb which is well serviced by three train stations and various bus routes. St Albans
includes various education facilities and the Victoria University Campus. The Sunshine Hospital and adjoining
health services are located in the south-east. Aged care facilities are located throughout the suburb and along key
roads. St Albans Activity Centre, local convenience shopping strips and a small isolated pocket of industrial land
provide land use variation.
There is limited dwelling type, colour or material palette difference between dwellings in different residential
zones. Contemporary buildings in the south-west are guided by a Development Plan Overlay which results in
uniform and similar development. Various Environmental Audit Overlays affect properties throughout St Albans.
The Activity Centre and Sunshine Hospital precinct are affected by a Design and Development Overlays
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Deciduous trees and olive tree planting along streets and within the private
realm.
•
Street layout:
Wide streetscapes create a spacious setting.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Sense of spaciousness as a result of private realm landscaping in front, side
and rear setbacks.
Threats
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Removal of vegetation and minimal areas for landscaping as a result of
contemporary and infill development.
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Dominance of car access and parking within side and front
setbacks and along the street.
•
Increased built form bulk or scale:
Increased site coverage and impervious surfaces.
•
High fencing:
High fencing and a lack of front garden landscaping.
•
Change in materiality or style:
Roller shutter treatments over windows reduce connection and visual
permeability with the street.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 17: St Albans Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Predominately active residential interfaces to bounding roads.
•
Back of fence interface separated by a vegetation buffer along Western Ring
Road.
•
Rail line separates the suburb into eastern and western parts.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Minimal street tree and canopy tree provision across the suburb.
•
Higher instances of street trees associated with new infill development areas or
as part of streetscape improvement works.
•
No consistent theme for street tree planting.
•
Street tree planting often by individual owners—olive trees/fruit trees.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
701 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Wide nature strips with raingardens south of Main Road and west of McKechnie
Street.
•
Minimal to moderate scale front gardens often incorporate fruit trees or
vegetable gardens.
•
Minimal front landscaping as part of contemporary development.
•
Landscaping often impacted upon by vehicle parking.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Wider streets south of Main Road.
•
Narrower streets in northwest.
Example: Jamieson Street.
•
Grid based street network in the north and northeast and southeast.
•
Court-bowls and curved road network are common in the south and northwest.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Moderate side setbacks as part of traditional housing stock.
•
Minimal front and side setbacks as part of contemporary development.
•
Moderate front setbacks on both sides of the street are typical.
•
Rear setbacks often contain garages or sheds.
•
Contemporary development achieves increased site coverage.
•
Multi-unit developments adjoining the activity centre in the south have high
levels of impervious surfaces.
Building types &
height
•
Predominately low rise single storey detached dwellings.
•
Contemporary development diversifies typology types. This includes attached
and detached townhouses, low scale apartments and multi-unit development
outcomes.
•
Traditional housing stock also includes single storey attached unit typologies.
•
Double storey multi-unit typologies along St Albans Road.
Lot size
•
Predominately 500–650sqm lots.
•
Lots greater than 800sqm predominately found south of Main Road in the west.
•
Residential density increases in the north.
•
Higher density outcomes around train stations.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Front fencing is common. Typically moderate to low scale and permeable.
•
Front fencing increases in scale in the east.
•
Fencing typically of brick materials often with wrought iron details.
•
Timber style fencing in the south and west.
Example: Disraeli Street.
•
Contemporary development often includes moderate scale front fences in brick
materials.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Side setbacks typically feature carports as part of traditional housing stock.
•
Side setbacks also provide access to rear garages and sheds as part of
traditional housing stock.
•
Carports, garages and sheds typically set back from the dwelling façade as part
of traditional housing stock.
•
Predominately single crossovers.
•
Garages integrated with built form as part of contemporary development.
Architectural Styles
and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately post-war development.
•
1970s to 1980s and more contemporary development in the southern and
western areas.
•
Variety of vacant sites throughout.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Predominately brick dwellings in orange and cream colours.
•
Contemporary development varies architectural styles and materials. Greater
variety in proximity to the activity centre.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
702 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Observations from the 2019 Neighbourhood Character study are affirmed in
respect to the contemporary townhouse development typically featuring mixed
materials in muted tones.
•
Similar architectural styles, colours and forms in south/west
– examples Rhodes
and Lima Street, Moonstone Circuit, Regan Place.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip roof styles in terracotta or dark tile.
•
Very limited other roof styles
•
Eaves are common as part of traditional housing stock which reduces as part of
contemporary townhouse development.
•
Limited solar panels on roofs.
Notable
Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Footpaths typical on both sides of the street.
•
Pedestrian linkages to Cairnlea in the south.
•
Limited internal east-west connectivity as a result of the rail line.
•
Streets heavily used for vehicle parking.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
703 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Sunshine
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 37: Sunshine - (Left) Heritage Dwellings along Benjamin Street. (Centre) Contemporary townhouses along
McCracken Street. (Right) Mixed era development along Fraser Street.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
704 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
A predominately residential suburb undergoing varied levels of growth and transition as a result of proximity to the
Sunshine Activity Centre and infill development of vacant sites. Large quantities of infill residential development
have been achieved close to the Activity Centre. Infill residential development associated with the Sunshine
Activity Centre has a direct interface with lower scale residential areas.
Despite increasing infill development, there are areas of similar building styles, material selection and
setbacks.
Similar building styles, material selection and front setbacks are particularly evident south of the train line and in
areas adjoining Herford Road. The train line and key access roads into and through Sunshine Activity Centre split
Sunshine into sections. This often results in varying housing typologies, building styles and streetscapes.
Local public open space includes varying levels of embellishments and often achieves a buffer between
residential land uses and the train line or commercial land uses. Small pockets of existing industrial and
employment-based land uses in the south provide a transition to more heavy industrial land uses adjoining
Kororoit Creek. Various education facilities particularly north of the rail line include primary, secondary and
university/TAFE campuses.
Heritage protection covers number of dwellings and streets which contributes positively to the streetscape and
neighbourhood setting of the immediate area. A Design and Development Overlay affects recently completed infill
development in the southwest. A Special Building Overlay affects properties that adjoin a linear drainage reserve
south of Ballarat Road. The Environment Audit Overlay affects both commercial, industrial and some residential
lots across Sunshine.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Street layout:
Wide streets allow for parking on both sides without limiting vehicle movements or
pedestrian safety.
•
Street layout:
Pedestrian oriented and permeable road network.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Building style and material consistency between
Wright Street and Morris Street contributes to character.
•
Vegetation and landscaping
: Street tree planting by individual owners creates a unique sense of place
and streetscape variation.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Areas of heritage protection contributes to the
streetscape and overall character of the suburb.
Threats
•
Limited connectivity or accessibility:
Poor residential interface with Kororoit Creek and relatively little
public open space limits connectivity to nature.
•
Poorly integrated retirement villages and aged care facilities:
Scale and siting of aged care and
mixed uses abutting lower scale residential areas.
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Minimal landscaping and loss of established vegetation as part of
contemporary development.
•
Inadequate landscaping
: Overhead powerlines limit canopy tree establishment.
•
High fencing
: high impermeable fencing to the property line (to screen private open space) along Wright
Street that is out of character with surrounding fencing treatments and front setbacks.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 18: Sunshine Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of
Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Traditional housing stock typically have back of fence interface with open space.
•
Contemporary development more predominate in the Residential Growth Zone in
the south adjoining Queen Circuit and in the southeast in proximity to Monash
and Parsons Streets.
•
Back of fence interface or local roads often provide a boundary between
residential and other land uses.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
705 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Direct residential and other mixed use abuttal to Ballarat Road.
•
Duke Street provides a local road boundary between Braybrook and Sunshine.
Residential development on the eastern side of Duke Street falls within
Braybrook.
•
Residential interface with industrial land uses in the southeast.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Moderate street tree planting with higher instances of established street trees.
•
Variety of street trees with no consistent planting theme.
•
Varied nature strip widths resulting in varied street tree planting.
•
Wider nature strips often retain established street trees.
Example: Duke Street.
•
New street trees as a result of streetscape improvement works.
•
Street tree planting often appears as a result of planting by individual owners—
olive trees and fruit trees.
•
Minimal to moderate landscaping of front gardens with canopy trees more often
within traditional housing stock front gardens.
•
Varied canopy coverage. Greater canopy coverage in the southeast adjoining
Parsons Street.
•
Nixon Street, Alexander Avenue, Cornwall Street (south of Monash Street) and
Moira Street are examples of a tree lined, landscaped setting.
•
Established trees within the side and rear setbacks of traditional housing stock.
•
Dwellings in Neighbourhood Residential Zone bounded by Monash Street, Duke
Street, Ruby Way and Drayton Street include moderate to generous front garden
landscaping
•
Front gardens often impacted upon by vehicle parking and access.
•
Palm trees along Victoria Street create a streetscape feature.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Grid based street network.
•
Dead end style treatments as a result of abuttal to Kororoit Creek.
•
Street widths allow for parking on both sides.
•
Rosedale Place provides a narrow dead-end style street network isolated from
broader Sunshine.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Uniformity and consistency of setbacks as part of traditional housing stock.
•
Moderate side setbacks for traditional housing stock.
•
Minimal setbacks as part of townhouse typologies.
•
Moderate to generous front setbacks for traditional housing stock.
•
Townhouse typologies achieve front setbacks in line with or less than traditional
housing stock and often are a dominant building on the street.
Example
:
Station
Place, Kinane Crescent, Matthew Street.
•
Contemporary development (both detached dwellings and townhouse typologies)
have minimal front and side setbacks and increased site coverage.
Building types &
height
•
Traditional housing stock is low rise, predominately single storey dwellings.
•
Contemporary infill development is low-midrise, 2–3 storey rendered brick
dwellings.
•
Limited instance of mid-rise apartments adjoining Alexandra Avenue.
•
Areas of heritage protection create unique pockets of building styles and types.
•
Medium density townhouses and units, dual occupancy, semi-detached and row
housing creates diversity.
Example: Cobrey Street, Norma Street and Duke
Street.
Lot size
•
Varied lot sizes with predominately 300–500sqm lots.
•
Traditional housing stock typically of 500–650sqm.
•
Lot sizes increase adjoining Kororoit Creek.
•
Residential density increases in the north and central areas.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
706 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Front fences are common.
•
Fencing is typically medium height, permeable and consisting of brick, wood or
metal finishes.
•
High impermeable fencing along Wright Street as a result of contemporary
development to screen private open space which is inconsistent with fencing
along the street.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Traditional housing stock typically features carports added on to dwellings within
the side setback, set back from the dwelling façade.
•
Contemporary infill development typically includes garages integrated into the
built form.
•
Concrete driveways dominate the street and impact on street tree provision.
•
Heritage dwellings typically do not have a carport or garage. Driveways are
provided for vehicle parking.
•
Predominantly single crossovers. Contemporary development often achieves
double crossovers.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Mix of eras, including heritage, post-war, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s
era development.
•
Heritage and 1900s to 1940s dwellings in the south and southwest.
•
Predominately post-war styles north of Monash Street, with some heritage areas.
•
Contemporary development scattered throughout often includes mock pre-war
architectural elements (e.g., weatherboard materials and steel roofs).
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Variety of building styles and materials, increasing in diversity north of the train
line and in proximity to Sunshine Activity Centre.
•
Brick dwellings are typically of orange and cream colours.
•
Variation in architectural styles, ranging from heritage and post-war to more
contemporary styles.
•
Solar panels and roller shutters are frequent.
•
Areas with similar building styles and materials between Wright Street and
Morris Street.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Varied roof styles, with hip styles with tile materials most common.
•
Hip style roofs with Colorbond material an emerging roof style.
•
Heritage dwellings predominately use tin/Colorbond material.
•
Eaves and verandas are common as part of traditional housing stock. Some
instances of eaves as part of contemporary development.
•
Solar panels are more common on contemporary development.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Grid network provides pedestrian paths on both sides of the street.
•
Strong pedestrian connections to open space, shared paths and Kororoit Creek.
•
Limited pedestrian connections across the train line.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
707 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Sunshine North
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 38: Sunshine North - (Left) Typical traditional house with canopy trees in front setback. (Centre) High density
contemporary development in the north. (Right) Slope responsive dwelling along River Valley Boulevard.
c
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
708 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
A m
ixture of traditional housing stock and more contemporary development with diverse
architectural styles, materials and colour palettes.
Traditional housing stock is typically single storey, situated on moderately sized lots. Medium density or dual
occupancy residential outcomes with increased density and site coverage are scattered throughout. Low scale
landscaping is achieved as part of traditional housing stock, this is further minimised as part of contemporary
development. Species selection is diverse and typically low scale. A greater level of canopy coverage is achieved
from street trees and other parts of the public realm than from private lots.
Contemporary townhouse and unit developments are scattered throughout but found more frequently in the
northeast, adjoining the Maribyrnong River. Contemporary and infill development results in increased site coverage
and built form bulk, together this increases impervious surfaces. These typologies often feature built form to the
property line, which reduces opportunity for side setback landscaping. Contemporary development often includes
double or triple storey height. Triple storey height is often a result of significant slope in the land and is common as
part of the River Valley Development.
Various smaller and larger vacant sites exist throughout the suburb, particularly in the southwest. These may be
subject to redevelopment in the future.
The area is surrounded by industrial development to the north, southwest and southeast adjoining Braybrook. The
Western Ring Road provides a hard boundary between Sunshine North and St Albans. Direct interfaces to non
residential zoned land often achieves high scaled fencing. McIntyre Road and Berkshire Road provide a separation
between industrial and residential land uses.
The suburb includes a variety of zones, including Industrial 3 and Industrial 1 Zones, Commercial 1 Zones, a Mixed
Use Zone and a small portion of Activity Centre 1 Zone in the south, adjoining Sunshine Activity Centre.
Design and Development Overlays affect land along the Maribyrnong River and McIntyre Road. Development Plan
Overlays affect infill development in the northeast and southwest adjoining St Albans Road. Heritage Overlays
affect three properties where design outcomes have integrated heritage features into larger developments. Land
Subject to Inundation and Floodway Overlays affect various streets within the northeast and southern parts of the
suburb.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Consistency of building styles along interface with
Sunshine/Ballarat Road.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Deciduous tree planting along streets and within the private realm.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Streets with established street trees and canopy coverage
•
Street layout:
Wide streets create a spacious setting.
•
Low to moderate height front fencing:
Limited front fencing on local roads.
Threats
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Significant areas of infill development.
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Removal of vegetation and minimal areas for landscaping as a result of
contemporary infill development.
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Increase in single crossovers which impacts street tree planting.
•
Dominant vehicle access and parking:
Dominance of car access and parking within contemporary
development areas.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Slope of the land in the northeast increases site coverage and limits landscaping.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
High levels of impervious surfaces in the northeast.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
709 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 19: Sunshine North Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Residential interface and frontage key local roads Example:
Ballarat Road and
McIntyre Road.
•
Maribyrnong River abuts the eastern suburb boundary.
•
Western Ring Road abuts the western boundary.
•
Direct interface with industrial areas and the rail corridor.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Uniform street tree planting.
Example: Harley Street.
•
Street trees typically established.
•
Moderate front gardens with varied low scale planting and limited canopy trees
as part of traditional housing stock.
•
Minimal front gardens as part of contemporary development.
•
Slope of front gardens in the northeast typically results in increased hardscaping
and minimal landscaping.
•
Back of fence interface is common to open space and pocket parks.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Largely grid based street network.
•
Wide streets that allow for parking on both sides.
•
Unconventional grid street network in the northwest and northeast with some
instances of dead-end style treatments.
•
Townhouse typologies in the northeast are accessed via narrow streets and lanes.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Minimal to moderate side setbacks.
•
Minimal front and side setbacks as part of contemporary infill development.
•
Dwellings built to boundary often as part of contemporary development.
•
Increased site coverage as part of contemporary development.
•
Moderate front setbacks as part of traditional housing stock on both sides of the
street.
Building types &
height
•
Traditional housing stock is predominately low rise single storey detached
dwellings.
•
Contemporary development is predominately double storey attached townhouses
or units.
•
Frequent dual occupancy development outcomes.
•
Various vacant sites.
Lot size
•
Varied lot sizes predominately 500–650sqm.
•
Larger lot sizes are typical adjoining Westmoreland Road.
•
Residential density increased in the north and central areas as part of
contemporary infill development.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Front fencing is common, typically low scale and permeable.
•
Timber and brick materials in light colours are common.
•
Contemporary development often includes front fencing in timber picket fence
styles.
•
Some instances of metal and ‘pool style’ fencing in both traditional and
contemporary housing stock.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Side setbacks in traditional housing stock typically include carports and vehicle
parking.
•
Some instances of garages integrated with the built form in traditional housing
stock.
•
Contemporary development predominately includes integrated garages.
•
Predominately single crossovers.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
710 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Some instances of dual crossovers, typically as part of contemporary infill
development.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Mixed eras of development.
•
Traditional housing stock is typically post-war era.
•
Substantial areas under development.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Built form styles and material/colour palette vary.
•
Traditional housing stock typically well-maintained brick in orange and cream
colours.
•
Some instances of weatherboard materials, which are typically less maintained,
in white and cream colours.
•
Contemporary infill development of varying architectural styles, typically in grey
tones.
•
Contemporary infill development introduces metal and rendered concrete
materials.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip roof styles with terracotta or charcoal tiles.
•
Contemporary development varies roof styles, with flat and shed roof styles
emerging.
•
Eaves are common as part of traditional housing stock. Limited instances of
eaves as part of contemporary development.
•
Solar panels are more common on contemporary development.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Typically footpaths on both sides of the street.
•
Slope of land in the northeast often results in single-side footpaths.
•
Footpaths not provided along the industrial side of Berkshire Road.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
711 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Sunshine West
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 39: Sunshine West - (Left) Dwellings with consistent setbacks, materials and colours in the south-east. (Centre)
dwellings with moderate setbacks and landscaping in the north-east along Kosky Street. (Right) Contemporary
development in the south-west.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
712 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
A mixture of wide grid based and curvilinear street networks which create a spacious setting and high levels of
pedestrian connectivity. There is limited vacant sites throughout and examples both small and large scale infill
development in recent years.
Distinct pockets of development forms and architectural styles exist throughout the suburb
.
This is likely a result of the gradual development of Sunshine West. There limited street based differences
between dwellings which fall in varied residential zones, except for areas subject to higher quantities of infill
development in the southwest.
Residential development is surrounded by hard and natural infrastructure assets being the Western Ring Road,
Kororoit Creek and industrial land uses in the south. There are limited vehicle connections to the north and east
into adjoining residential suburbs.
The suburb contains varied canopy coverage and street tree provision. Front landscaping achieves moderate
landscaping in the north and northeast. Landscaping is significantly impacted by vehicle access and parking in the
southeast.
Nine education facilities, local convenience centres and a variety of open space and linear reserves service the
area. Overhead transmission powerlines run north to south through the centre of the suburb.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Consistency of siting, setbacks and site coverage:
Consistent and uniform setbacks.
•
Consistency of siting, setbacks and site coverage:
Development typically respects surrounding built
form siting and design outcomes.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Complementary material selection contribute to
character in the northeast.
•
Integrated infill development:
Infill development provides an active interface to open space and pocket
parks.
•
Street layout:
Grid based and wide street networks contribute to a spacious setting.
•
Low to moderate height front fencing:
Low rise or no front fences along the length of the street.
Threats
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Removal of canopy trees in the private realm as part of contemporary infill
development.
•
Change in materiality or style:
Limited building and landscaping maintenance in the southeast impacts
the quality of the streetscape.
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Impacts on private realm landscaping as a result of more prominent built
form on a lot.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 20: Sunshine West Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Drainage easement in the south provides separation between land uses.
•
Back of fence interface to Kororoit Creek, open space, linear reserves and
pocket parks.
•
Back fence interface and direct abuttal to Western Ring Road.
•
Sound barrier along the rail line limits visibility and connectivity to Ardeer.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Varied streets and street tree planting.
•
Increased street tree planting in contemporary development.
•
Canopy trees more often found within the private realm than the public realm.
•
Moderate front landscaping as part of traditional housing stock.
•
Minimal front landscaping in the southeast, often only lawn.
•
Contemporary development results in minimal front landscaping with no canopy
tree provision.
•
Street tree planting often by individual owners—olive trees and fruit trees.
•
Typically well-maintained, neat private landscaping.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
713 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Predominately wide streets. Infill development reduce street widths.
•
Grid based street network in the north and northeast.
•
Curvilinear dead-end style street network in the south.
•
Irregular narrow grid network as part of infill development in the west.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Variation in setbacks across the suburb often a result of different pockets of
development eras.
•
Minimal front and side setbacks as part of contemporary development.
•
Traditional housing stock includes moderate front setbacks and minimal
moderate side setbacks.
•
Contemporary developments are typically built to property line.
•
Uniform setbacks as part of traditional housing stock
Example: Killara Street,
Korowa Street.
•
Front setbacks provide vehicle parking that typically impacts landscaping.
•
Larger detached dwellings and infill development increases site coverage.
•
Dwellings in the southeast are often setback from the street on an angle.
Building types &
height
•
Traditional housing stock predominately low rise, single storey detached
dwellings.
•
Contemporary development typically single to double storey, some instances of
triple storey. A mix of detached dwellings and attached townhouses and units.
•
Pockets of predominately double storey detached dwellings on larger lots in the
southwest adjoining The Avenue.
•
Architectural elements on dwellings in the southwest often accentuate the height
of the dwelling.
Lot size
•
Varied lot sizes associated with variation in development era.
•
Predominately 500–650sqm sized lots in the south and northeast.
•
Lots 650–800sqm in the north with some instances of 800–1000sqm lots.
•
Highest density in the southwest.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Typically low scale, permeable brick front fencing with metal detail.
•
Front fencing common in the north and northeast.
•
Limited front fencing in the southeast. Often ‘pool style’.
•
Limited front fencing as part of contemporary development.
•
Some instances of moderate to high permeable fencing with wrought iron details
in north.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Garages and carports are set back or in line with front façades.
•
Traditional housing stock typically includes vehicle access and parking within
side setbacks.
•
Garages integrated in as part of the dwelling in contemporary development.
•
Predominately single crossovers. Dual crossovers more common in southwest.
Architectural Styles and Roof
Styles
Era of
development
•
Distinctive eras of development.
•
1980s style builds in the southeast, 1990s to 2000s style builds in the southwest
and 1950 - 1970s builds in the north abutting the train line.
•
Recent 1990s to 2000s infill development in the west and adjoining central
convenience centres.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Variation in building quality, with rendered materials typically displaying water
damage.
•
Variation in architectural styles and colours in the west.
•
Consistent red brick materials in the northwest. Observations from 2019
Neighbourhood Character Study are affirmed in respect to red brick materials
along Glengala Road.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
714 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Infill development typical includes a mix of brick and rendered concrete in neutral
finishes.
•
Brick dwellings typically of orange and cream colours.
•
Roller shutters form part of dwellings more frequently in the south and southeast.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Predominately hip and flat roofs styles.
•
Traditional housing stock includes hip style tiled roofs.
•
Contemporary infill development has flat roof styles.
•
Limited terracotta roof colours in the southwest.
•
Eaves are common as part of traditional housing stock. Some instances of eaves
as part of contemporary development.
•
Limited instances of solar panels on roofs.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Frequent pedestrian and cyclist crossings over Kororoit Creek.
•
North-south road alignment provides direct access to Ardeer Station.
•
Limited pedestrian connectivity within the central transmission line easement.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
715 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Sydenham
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 40: Sydenham - (Left) Gated development outcome. (Centre) Townhouse typologies along Trickey Avenue.
(Right) Spacious streets with canopy trees in the north.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
716 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Whilst traditionally single and double storey detached dwellings, Sydenham is undergoing residential transition.
Residential transition result in the development of medium density and apartment style typologies in close
proximity to Watergardens Train Station and Melton Highway. An increase in housing density due to different
residential zoning is evident from the street network, particularly along Trickey Avenue and Pecks Road.
Recent medium density and apartment typologies vary the streetscape by increasing vehicle crossovers,
reducing front setbacks and providing limited integration with adjoining open space.
Various vacant sites across the suburb provide further opportunity for an increase in residential development. This
is particularly evident along Melton Highway and Sydenham Road. However, higher building heights are unlikely
to obscure any important view lines.
Positioned between Calder Park Drive (west) and the Sunbury Rain Line (east). The rail line provides a hard
boundary between residential development and Watergardens Shopping Centre. Residential lots have a back of
fence interface occur along the full length of Calder Park Drive. Varied interfaces, including slip lane access, are
provided to both Melton Highway and Hume Drive. Narrow curvilinear streets typically include footpaths on one
side only. Vehicle parking on the nature strip is also typical, this limits street tree provision.
Aged care facilities and gated residential areas dominate the streetscape and introduce fencing in areas where
fencing has traditionally not occurred. Several primary and secondary schools, commercial land uses and linkages
to Watergardens Shopping Centre provide access to convenience and education. Open space is scattered
throughout the suburb.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Native gums appear to be the prevailing canopy tree and contribute to overall
greening.
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Private front gardens are well-maintained and tidy.
•
Low to moderate height front fencing:
Little to no front fencing.
Threats
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Contemporary development varies built form scale, site coverage and setback
along the street.
•
Poorly integrated retirement villages and aged care facilities:
Limited integration of residential dwellings
and aged care centres into adjoining public open space.
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Limited landscaping outcomes as part of contemporary development and low rise
apartment typologies.
•
High fencing:
Prominent fencing around aged care facilities and gated residential areas.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 21: Sydenham Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Road interface along the full length of the rail line.
•
Back fence interface along the full frontage to Calder Park Drive.
•
Mixed interface treatments to Melton Highway.
•
Melton Highway limits both pedestrian and vehicle north-south connectivity.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Canopy trees and shrubs along the residential interface with both the rail line
and Calder Park Drive.
•
Moderate front garden landscaping.
•
Minimal front garden landscaping as part of contemporary development.
•
Minimal canopy tree and street tree provision throughout.
•
Native gums appear to be the prevailing canopy tree.
•
Overton Lea Boulevard is moderately landscaped with shrubs and canopy trees.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
717 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Varied front garden species planting with higher instances of gravel in
replacement of lawn.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Mix of curvilinear with cul-de-sac pattern and grid based street layouts.
•
Narrow streets.
•
Community Hub and Overton Lea Boulevard (streets in Sydenham) provide wider
streets.
•
Series of dead-end /gun barrel streets and driveways associated with
contemporary development in the south-east.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Minimal side setbacks that increase to moderate north of Melton Highway.
•
Moderate front setbacks as part of traditional housing stock.
•
Minimal front setbacks as part of townhouse and apartment typologies.
•
Garages often built to property boundary, resulting in no side setbacks.
•
Townhouse and apartment typologies have minimal front setbacks not in keeping
with the street.
Building types &
height
•
Low rise, predominately single store detached dwellings
•
Limited instances of double storey detached dwellings as part of traditional
housing stock.
•
Double storey townhouse typologies particularly in the southeast.
•
Triple storey development in the east in proximity Melton Highway.
•
Older style townhouse typologies in the north.
Example: Victoria Road, Chandos
Street and Erskine Way.
Lot size
•
Mix of lot sizes throughout, with lot sizes increasing in the north.
•
Predominately 500–600sqm lots to the south of Melton Highway.
•
Large lot sizes above 1000sqm north of Melton Highway.
•
A high proportion of lots under 400sqm along Pecks Road and Sydenham Road.
•
Various vacant lots.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Limited front fencing.
•
Where front fences exist, these are typically low and permeable, and of wood,
brick or metal ‘pool style’ in green or white colours.
•
Colorbond steel fencing alongside boundary to the street is common.
•
Prominent fencing around aged care facilities and gated residential areas.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Carports and garages provided in line with, or set back from, front façades in
both traditional and contemporary housing stock.
•
Moderate side setbacks provide vehicle access for larger lots.
•
Front setbacks of multi-unit and townhouse tenancies often used for additional
vehicle parking.
•
Townhouse and units achieve access via shared driveways.
•
Larger lot sizes often feature double crossovers.
Architectural Styles and Roof
Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominately 1990s to 2000s builds.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Traditional brick dwellings typically in red, orange and cream brick.
•
Rendered concrete in more recent builds typically grey and cream.
•
Variety of materials and colours particularly evident along Sydenham Road north
of Melton Highway.
•
Increasing use of dark colours and materials.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Gable or hipped roof styles.
•
Hip roof styles are common with dark or terracotta tiles.
•
Dutch style roofs as part of traditional housing stock.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
718 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Eaves are common across both single and double storey dwellings.
•
Solar panels are more common on contemporary development.
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths predominately on one side of street.
•
Some instances of no pedestrian path as part of dead-end style streets.
Example: Gibson Court.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
719 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Taylors Lakes
Zones and Overlay Plan
Figure 41: Taylors Lakes - (Left) Diversity in architectural styles on Perceval Crescent. (Centre)
Contemporary townhouse development along Wentworth Drive. (Right) Palm and Cyprus trees in the nature
strip
.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
720 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Existing Suburb Character Description
Predominately detached residential dwellings on larger lots with increased building bulk and scale. Generous front
setbacks typically allow space for well-maintained moderate scale plantings.
A spacious landscape setting integrates with the broader open space and creek line network.
Limited infill development outcomes are present. Double storey townhouses along Wentworth Road, Village
Avenue and Shoppers Lane feature colours and materials similar to traditional housing stock and achieve a
moderate level of integration to the street.
Relatively flat with minimal slopes towards Taylors Creek. The subdivision layout allows for residential
development to positively address open space and natural assets throughout the suburb. A spacious and
curvilinear street network provides footpaths, typically on one side. Generous front setbacks and nature strips
contribute to a sense of spaciousness. Back of fence treatments to the transmission line easement limit visual
connectivity and passive surveillance of the linear reserve.
Kings Road and Sunshine Avenue dissect the suburb in a north-south direction and Melton Highway dissects the
suburb in an east-west direction. This results in minor changes to architectural styles and building materials.
Both municipal and local scale convenience and retail provision abut Melton Highway. Integrated bulky goods are
located along McCubbin Drive. School and active recreation facilities are integrated within residential areas. Back
of fence treatments are typical adjoining major roads and commercial/retail land uses. There is restricted
pedestrian connectivity to both Watergardens Shopping Centre and Watergardens Train Station.
The Melbourne Airport Environs Overlay affects properties in the north. The Comprehensive Development Zone
affects land north of Melton Highway. A Development Plan Overlay affects future development off Robertsons
Road.
Suburb Contributors and Threats
Contributors
•
Vegetation and landscaping:
Private realm and street tree planting contribute to a spacious landscape
setting and overall greening.
•
Street layout:
Wide streets contribute to a spacious landscape setting.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Varied architectural styles with a similar colour palette
contribute to the sense of character.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
High quality and well-maintained residential dwellings.
•
Consistent, complementary colours and materials:
Townhouse typologies use orange and cream brick in
keeping with traditional housing stock.
Threats
•
Excessive bulk or height:
Increased site coverage which limits landscaping.
•
Inadequate landscaping:
Removal of established street trees to provide further vehicle crossovers.
Neighbourhood Character Features
Table 22: Taylors Lakes Neighbourhood Character Feature Observations
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Pattern of
Development
Locations,
transitions &
boundaries
•
Limited residential interface along Kings Road with back of fence interface along
the southern side and slip lane access along the northern side.
•
Back of fence interface along Calder Freeway.
Private & public
realm
landscaping
•
Established street planting on most streets.
•
Palm and Cyprus trees within private realm landscaping, particularly in the south.
•
Moderate front garden planting often shrubs lining the pavement, low rise
plantings or lawn.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
721 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
•
Established canopy trees are present in most front gardens.
•
Various species of street trees across the suburb.
Street alignment,
type &
proportions
•
Curvilinear with a cul-de-sac pattern street network.
•
Slip lane allows access to dwellings from Melton Highway and Kings Road.
•
Wide streets throughout.
Built Form Scale and Character
Setbacks & site
coverage
•
Moderate side setbacks typically offer access to rear of properties or carports.
•
Generous front setbacks that often feel more spacious as a result of no footpath
provision.
•
Large building footprints increase site coverage.
Building types &
height
•
Predominately single and double storey detached dwellings.
•
Contemporary townhouse development with homogenous built form within
proximity to Watergardens Activity Centre or Melton Highway.
Example:
Wentworth Road, Village Avenue, Shoppers Lane.
Lot size
•
Predominately lots of 650–1000sqm.
•
Lots greater than 1000sqm adjoin the Calder Freeway.
•
Lots less than 300sqm typical of townhouse development.
Example: Wentworth
Road, Village Avenue, Shoppers Lane.
Fencing height,
materiality,
finish &
transparency
•
Limited front fencing.
•
Some instances of low to medium front fencing, typically of moderate
permeability.
•
Brick and stained timber material selection in instances of front fencing.
•
Hedging often used in the absence of front fencing to provide separation.
Garages,
carports,
crossovers,
access & car
parking
•
Garages and carports often integrated with the dwelling, typically of brick
material.
•
Side-of-house carports of Colorbond steel.
•
Varied provision of single and double crossovers.
•
Double crossovers to a single dwelling more predominate north of Melton
Highway.
•
Double crossovers achieve access for two townhouses.
Architectural Styles and Roof Styles
Era of
development
•
Predominantly 1990s to 2000s along north and southwest.
•
Predominantly 1980s in the south adjoining Keilor Downs.
•
Emerging 2000s builds as a result of infill development.
Building
materiality &
quality
•
Predominately brick dwellings typically of orange and cream colours.
•
Light coloured concrete and rendered materials used in 2000s era development.
•
Varied architectural styles with high levels of maintenance and quality.
•
Townhouse typologies use orange and cream brick in keeping with traditional
housing stock.
•
Some instances of coloured render as part of detached dwellings.
Roof styles,
materials &
colours
•
Varied roof styles throughout. Typically gable roof styles.
•
Several instances of hip and flat roof styles. Flat roof styles are typically
associated with 2000s era detached dwellings.
•
Charcoal and terracotta tile colour is predominant.
•
Some instances of eaves.
•
Some instances of solar panels on roofs.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
722 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Features for Assessment
Neighbourhood Feature Observations
Notable Features
Details of the
footpath & street
•
Pedestrian paths largely on one side of the street
•
Pedestrian paths connect dead-end style streets.
•
Some instances of no footpaths as part of court bowls and dead-end style
streets.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
723 of 891
Attachment 12.7.5
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
724 of 891
12.8
Impact And Mitigation Of Aircraft Noise Inquiry Draft Submission
12.8
Impact and Mitigation of Aircraft
Noise Inquiry Draft Submission
Directorate
City Futures
Director
Kelvin Walsh
Manager
Leanne Deans
Attachment(s)
1. Brimbank Council Submission to
Parliamentary Inquiry into Impact
and Mitigation of Aircraft Noise
[
12.8.1
- 72 pages]
Purpose
For Council to consider the draft Submission to the Commonwealth Rural and Regional
Affairs and Transport References Committee Inquiry into the Impacts and Mitigation of
Aircraft Noise, shown at
Attachment 1
.
Officer Recommendation
That Council:
a. Notes and endorses the draft Submission to the Commonwealth Rural and
Regional Affairs Transport References Committee Inquiry into the
Impacts and Mitigation of Aircraft Noise, shown at Attachment 1.
b. Submits the draft Submission on the Impacts and Mitigation of Aircraft
Noise, shown at Attachment 1, to the Commonwealth Rural and Regional
Affairs Transport References Committee.
Background
On 6 February 2024, the Commonwealth Rural and Regional Affairs Transport References
Committee (the Committee) was referred an Inquiry into the Impacts and Mitigation of
Aircraft Noise (the Inquiry).
The Inquiry is focussed on the impact and mitigation of aircraft noise on residents and
business in capital cities and regional towns, particularly:
the effect of aircraft noise on amenity, physical and mental wellbeing and
everyday life of residents;
the effect of aircraft noise on small business;
any proposals for the mitigation and limitation of aircraft noise, including flight
curfews, changes to flight paths and alternatives to air travel;
any barriers to the mitigation and limitation of aircraft noise; and
any other related matters.
Melbourne Airport is located within the City of Hume and just north of the Brimbank local
government boundary. It has a substantial presence and interface with the Tullamarine
and Keilor Park industrial precincts, the Brimbank Green Wedge area, as well as
Brimbank’s established residential areas including Keilor, Keilor Park, Taylors Lakes, St
Albans, Sunshine North and Sunshine. These areas are impacted by the Melbourne
Airport Environs Overlay (MAEO) and Australian Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF) 20 and
25, with Keilor and Keilor Park also being impacted by the Public Safety Area. The
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
725 of 891
combined area of Brimbank impacted by the MAEO includes 3547 hectares and 23,750
dwellings. Neighbouring suburbs are also impacted by flight paths and N Contours.
Council has previously made submissions to State and Federal Governments relating to
aviation and more specifically the impact Melbourne Airport has on the Brimbank
community including to the:
2022 Draft Melbourne Airport Master Plan (2022)
Preliminary Draft Major Development Plan for the Third Runway (2022)
Aviation White Paper Terms of Reference (2023)
Aviation Green Paper (2023).
The draft Submission to the Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References
Committee Inquiry into the Impacts and Mitigation of Aircraft Noise (draft Submission), is
shown at
Attachment 1
and draws on previous submissions. The draft Submission also
includes the Melbourne Airport Expansion Noise Health Risk Assessment prepared by Dr
Lyn Denison from Tonkin & Taylor, that formed part of Councils submission to the 2022
Draft Melbourne Airport Master Plan and Preliminary Draft Major Development Plan for
the Third Runway.
Matters for Consideration
Options
The following options are available to Council:
a. Endorse the draft Submission to the Inquiry shown at
Attachment 1
and submit
it to the Committee.
b. Endorse the draft Submission to the Inquiry shown at
Attachment 1
, with
changes and submit it to the Committee.
c. Determine not to endorse the Submission to the Inquiry shown at
Attachment
1
, with no further action.
The officer recommendation is Option A. The Submission to the Inquiry aligns with
previous advocacy in relation to Melbourne Airport and aviation related matters.
Analysis
The Inquiry creates an opportunity for Council to present evidence directly to the
Committee on the extent that aircraft noise can impact the health and wellbeing of
communities that surround airports.
Council acknowledges that aviation plays a significant role in supporting economic
development, commerce and trade and the visitor economy at an international, state,
regional and local level. Aviation can also provide the catalyst for infrastructure
investment such as Melbourne Airport Rail, which if delivered, could support the
transformation of parts of Brimbank. Notwithstanding, the expansion of the aviation
sector cannot come at the expense of community health and wellbeing.
Key outcomes and recommendations that are highlighted in Council’s draft Submission
includes (but is not limited to):
Undertaking a review of the aircraft noise system to minimise harm to human
health and provide health impact guidance to protect community from aircraft
noise. This should include the establishment of appropriate noise metrics that
accord with health guidance established by WHO, and best practice noise
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
726 of 891
prevention and amelioration measures to address noise exceedances, including
the establishment of a noise insulation program and compensation scheme.
Requiring airports to prepare a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) for the
development and expansion of runways as part of the Master Plan and MDP, that
are assessed against WHO Noise Guidance; mandating that the HIA undergoes
an independent and expert peer review to ensure its veracity; and requiring that
the HIA and peer review are made available for public review as part of the
statutory consultation.
Providing clear guidance that requires mitigation and amelioration measures to
adequately address noise exceedances beyond the WHO Noise Guidance,
including setting out the range of options including, but not limited to - a
federally funded noise insulation program, a noise curfew, voluntary property
acquisition or other measures to ensure that the impacts are adequately
addressed and minimised.
Requiring a review of the current noise management system, including the
composition and management of Aviation Community Consultation Groups,
Airservices Australia noise complaints system and the purpose of Environmental
Noise Units surrounding airports.
Establishing a policy framework that outlines a compensation scheme for airport
impacted communities. This should be provided either by means of a noise
amelioration program or to owners of dwellings and buildings accommodating
sensitive land uses (i.e., schools, places of worship, childcare centres and
hospitals) adversely affected by aircraft noise. Such a compensation scheme
aligns with the legislated requirement under the Aircraft Noise Levy Act 1995
which aims to recover the costs incurred in providing noise amelioration
programs to airport-impacted communities.
Increase transparency including consideration for commissioning a third-party
peer review of Airport Master Plans and runway Major Development Plans,
particularly where there are impacts on the health and wellbeing of surrounding
communities.
Support for new technologies and innovation where they contribute to
sustainability, increases employment and economic output and do not adversely
affect the health and wellbeing of the community e.g. quieter engines.
Community Engagement
The Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee invited submissions
to the Inquiry via the Parliament of Australia website, which are due by 30 April 2024.
Resource And Risk Implications
Resource requirements for the preparation of this submission have been met within the
2023/2024 Annual Plan.
Community:
potential impact on community, including public trust and customer service
impact
• Yes - Council continues to advocate about the unreasonable and unacceptable health
impacts of airport and aviation development on community, and for improved airport
planning and greater transparency.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
727 of 891
Environmental:
impacts on environmental sustainability, including water/waste
management, climate change, and contaminated land
• Yes – The aviation sector contributes significantly to environmental impacts including
the impacts of noise.
Financial:
significant financial impacts
• Yes – There is likely to be financial impacts on airports if they are required to consider
community health and wellbeing as part of their development and growth, and
specifically if they are required to contribute to noise attenuation and compensation
schemes. Conversely, the expansion of airports that results in greater noise impacts on
residents may require in surrounding property to fund noise attenuation at their own cost
if appropriate programs are not put in place.
Regulatory:
legal, legislative or regulatory implications including the rights/obligations
of stakeholders
• Yes – The legislative framework informing the airport planning needs to be
strengthened to facilitate improved outcomes.
Safety
: health, safety or duty of care impacts
• Yes – There are a range of safety matters that impact communities surrounding
airports including those identified in the National Airports Safeguarding Framework and
referenced in Victorian planning schemes.
Legislation/Council Plan/Policy Context
This report supports the Council Plan 2021-2025 strategic direction and objective of:
2. Places and Spaces - Liveable and connected neighbourhoods that support
healthy and sustainable futures - A green place for all
• Liveable and Connected - Inviting and liveable spaces and facilities, connected so
people can get around
• Sustainable and Green - Protect natural environments for current and future
generations
3. Opportunity and Prosperity - A future focused, transforming city where all
have opportunities to learn and earn - A prosperous place for all
• Growing and Transforming - Optimise community opportunities through infrastructure
innovation and investment.
Council officers contributing to the preparation and approval of this report have no
conflicts of interests to declare.
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
1
of
15
Brimbank City Council -
Submission to the Rural and
Regional Affairs Transport
References Committee 2024
1. Introduction
Brimbank City Council (Council) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Rural
and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee (The Committee) inquiry
regarding the impact and mitigation of aircraft noise.
The City of Brimbank (Brimbank) is located approximately 11 to 18 kilometers west
and north-west of the
Melbourne Central Business District. Covering 123 square
kilometers, Brimbank is a culturally diverse community of 196,712 residents who
speak over 90 different languages. Notably, 57.3% of residents speak another
language other than English at home (Brimbank Profile ID 2021).
Melbourne
Airport is located within the City of Hume and just north of the Brimbank
local government boundary. It has a substantial presence and interface with the
Tullamarine
and Keilor Park industrial precincts, the Brimbank Green Wedge area, as
well as Brimbank’s established residential areas including Keilor, Keilor Park, Taylors
Lakes, St Albans, Sunshine North and Sunshine. These
areas are impacted by the
Melbourne Airport Environs Overlay (MAEO) and Australian
Noise Exposure Forecast
(ANEF) 20 and 25, with Keilor and Keilor Park also being impacted by the Public Safety
Area. The impacts cover a combined area of 3547 hectares and 23,750 dwellings.
Neighbouring suburbs are also impacted by these flight paths and N Contours.
Council acknowledges that aviation plays a significant role in supporting economic
development, commerce and trade and the visitor economy at an international,
state, regional and local level. Aviation also provides a catalyst for infrastructure
investment
such as Melbourne Airport Rail which could transform parts of Brimbank.
Notwithstanding, the expansion of aviation cannot come at the expense of
community health and wellbeing.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
728 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
2
of
15
The development of Melbourne Airport and its impact on Brimbank as well as the
recent
Aviation Green Paper published by the Federal Government in 2023 has
informed this submission to The Committee’s inquiry. In May 2022, Council resolved to
oppose the 2022 Draft Melbourne Airport Master Plan (Master Plan) and Preliminary
Dr
aft Major Development Plan for the Third Runway (MDP) predominantly as it:
Didn’t adequately identify the environmental impacts reasonably expected
to be associated with the proposed development on the Brimbank
community
Would impose unreasonable and unacceptable health risks to the Brimbank
community
Didn’t include adequate plans for dealing with the environmental impacts,
specifically including prevention and amelioration of aircraft noise.
Council is seeking the Federal Government give greater regard to the health and
wellbeing of communities that surround airports and that are impacted by aircraft
noise. A summary of key proposals that may mitigate and limit aircraft noise and
other related matters include:
Undertaking a review of the aircraft noise system to minimise harm to human
health and provide health impact Guidelines to protect community from
aircraftnoise. This should include the establishment of appropriate noise
metrics that accord with health Guidelines established by the
World Health
Organisation Environmental Noise Guidelines 2018 (WHO Noise Guidelines),
and best practice noise prevention and amelioration measures to address
noise exceedances, including the establishment of a noise insulation program
and compensation scheme.
Requiring airports to prepare a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) for the
development and expansion of runways as part of the Master Plan and MDP, that
are assessed against WHO Noise Guidelines; mandating
that the HIA undergoes
an independent and expert peer review to ensure its veracity; and requiring that
the HIA and peer review
are made available for public review as part of the
statutory consultation.
Providing clear Guidelines that requires prevention and amelioration measures to
adequately address noise exceedances beyond the WHO Noise Guidelines,
incl
uding setting out the range of options including, but not limited to - a federally
funded noise insulation program, a noise curfew, voluntary property acquisition or
other measures to ensure that the impacts are adequately addressed and
minimised.
Requiring a review of the current noise management system, including the
composition and management of Aviation Community Consultation Groups,
Airservices Australia noise complaints system and the purpose of the
Environmental Monitor Unit (EMU) surrounding airports.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
729 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
3
of
15
Establishing a policy framework that outlines a compensation scheme for airport
impacted communities. This should be provided either by means of a noise
amelioration program or to owners of
dwellings and buildings accommodating
sensitive land uses (i.e. schools, places of worship, childcare centers and hospitals)
adversely affected by aircraft noise. Such a compensation scheme aligns with the
legislated requirement under the Aircraft Noise Levy Act 1995
which aims to
recover the costs incurred in providing noise amelioration programs to airport
impacted communities.
Increase transparency including consideration for commissioning a third-party
peer review of Airport Master Plans and runway Major Development Plans,
particularly where there are impacts on the health and wellbeing of surrounding
communities.
Support for new technologies and innovation where they contribute to
sustainability, increases employment and economic output
and do not adversely
affect the health and wellbeing of the community e.g. quieter engines.
Council also submits the expert advice of
Tonkin & Taylor, who were commissioned
by Council to undertake
a Health Risk Assessment and air quality assessment (HRA)
in relation to Melbourne Airport’s 2022 Master Plan and MDP. This HRA was led by Dr
Lyn Denison, a qualified scientist specialising in air quality and health risk
assessment, and it includes noise modelling undertaken by noise expert Marshall
Day. The HRA forms as an attachment to this submission.
2. Issues and Recommendations
2.1 Australian Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF)
Aircraft noise is one of the most detrimental side effects of aviation. The effect of
aircraft noise on affected communities is not just limited to annoyance and sleep
disturbance,
but includes impacts such as anxiety, depression, heart disease and
cognitive impairment as well as poorer educational outcomes in children.
Council engaged the expert advice of Tonkin & Taylor,
to undertake a Health Risk
Assessment and air
quality assessment (HRA) in relation to Melbourne Airport’s 2022
Master Plan and MDP. This HRA was led by Dr Lyn Denison, a qualified scientist
specialising in air quality and health risk assessment, and it includes noise modelling
undertaken by noise expert Marshall Day. The HRA forms as an attachment to this
submission.
Dr Denison identified in her findings that guidelines in the WHO Noise Guidelines
were exceeded across the areas within the ANEF 20 and ANEF 25 contours, indicating
that there was an increased risk of adverse health effects within the exposed
population.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
730 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
4
of
15
Dr Denison identified that the metrics used in the Master Plan are those specified by
AS2021:2015.
These metrics are based on amenity impacts, not health impacts, and
do not take into account the more recent information on the health effects of noise
by WHO Noise Guidelines. On this basis, the values used by the Melbourne Airport
2022 Draft Master Plan are not consistent with the metrics recommended by the
WHO Noise Guidelines, which have been developed to guard against long-term
exposure to aircraft noise.
In
the case of Melbourne Airport, no genuine consideration was given to the health
implications for Brimbank
’
s residents or any effective
ways to reduce and mitigate
these impacts. Specifically Melbourne Airport
’
s 2022 Draft Master Plan forecast noise
levels in the ANEF 20 and 25, that exceed WHO Noise Guidelines threshold for
annoyance, sleep disturbance, and cognitive development in children.
The Western Sydney International Environmental Airport
–
Airspace and Flight Path
Design
–
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Western Sydney Airport Draft EIS)
was released on 24 October 2023 for public exhibition and examines the impact of
the proposed flight paths on the environment and the community.
Importantly, it found that there is the potential for noise
from the project to result in
potentially significant increases in sleep disturbance, noise annoyance (and therefore
complaints) and, to a lesser extent, cognitive impairment for children (as learning
delays). These impacts were identified at a number of receptors located close to the
runway as well as beneath the approaches and take off routes away from the
runway. Most of the impacts on community health that are considered to be
potentially significant are located within the existing or predicted Australian Noise
Exposure Concept (ANEC) 20 contours.
The Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development,
Communications and the Arts (DITRDCA) has developed a draft Noise Insulation and
Property Acquisition (NIPA) policy in relation to aircraft overflight noise for buildings
outside the Western Sydney International (Nancy-Bird Walton) Airport site. The NIPA
policy details the eligibility requirements for inclusion and is based on the aircraft
noise results from this assessment. From this, treatments for residential
and non
residential buildings partly or wholly within ANEC 20 are targeted and treated such
that the maximum allowable internal noise can only reach 50 dB(A). Buildings within
the ANEC 40 contour are automatically considered for acquisition by DITRDCA.
Council
contends that Melbourne Airport
’
s 2022 Master Plan and MDP has the
potential for unreasonable and unacceptable impacts on the health and wellbeing of
the community, mostly due to aircraft noise. The 2022 ANEF 25
contour outlined in
the Master Plan and MDP impacts areas of Keilor, Keilor Park and Keilor North in
Brimbank, while the ANEF 20 contour extends as far south as Sunshine North and
covers the suburbs of Keilor, Keilor Park and Kealba. Importantly, many of these
dwellings were constructed without noise attenuation as it was not a requirement at
the time of construction.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
731 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
5
of
15
Council submits that the Federal Government should develop a noise compensation
scheme for airport-impacted communities to address the negative impacts of living
near an airport. The nature of which would need to be determined by a suitably
qualified expert. It appears that while this approach is being undertaken for Western
Sydney International Airport, it is not being instigated elsewhere. This suggests there
is
an inconsistent regard to
airport planning and community health and wellbeing.
Council submits that an
independent expert review must be undertaken of the ANEF
and Noise Contour system to assess the impact of aircraft noise on human health
and wellbeing against the WHO Guidelines. The outcomes of this work should inform
the establishment of appropriate noise metrics that accord with the WHO Noise
Guidelines, and is ultimately embedded in the legislative framework that directs
airport planning to ensure that its impacts, specifically
aircraft noise, do not have an
unacceptable impact on the health and wellbeing of the community. Importantly, this
work should also inform best practice noise prevention and amelioration measures to
address noise exceedances, including the establishment of a noise insulation program
and compensation scheme.
Council also seeks a stronger focus on the ongoing measuring of
aircraft noise to
ensure it is not exceeding noise forecasts to safeguard community health and
wellbeing. Airservices Australia (Airservices) has indicated that there is a common
misconception
that current noise monitoring is undertaken to determine compliance
with aircraft noise regulations, and have also indicated there are no Australian
regulations which specify a maximum allowable level of aircraft noise. In addition to
establishing an acceptable range of aviation noise
metrics, Council also submits that
this requires ongoing noise monitoring to support compliance with the system.
2.1.1 Proposals / Recommendations:
1. Undertake an independent and expert review of ANEF and Noise Contour
systems to assess the impact of aircraft noise on human health and wellbeing
against the WHO Noise Guidelines to inform the establishment of a noise metric
system that minimises harm to human health.
2. Establish and integrate a noise metric system that incorporates health and
safety considerations and embed it in the regulatory framework for airport
planning (e.g. Airports Act), and require it to be used to protect comm
unity
from aircraft noise impacts.
3. Introduce changes to legislation that require airports to prepare a well-founded
Health
Impact Assessment (HIA) in relation to the off-site noise impacts
associated with Master Plans and runway MDPs that accord with the WHO Noise
Guidelines. All HIAs prepared should then be subject to an independent and
expert peer review to ensure its veracity. Peer review reports should then be
made available for public review as part of the statutory consultation for Master
Plans and runway MDPs.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
732 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
6
of
15
4. Support and fund an appropriate network of EMUs for the purpose of measuring
aircraft noise to ensure that forecast aircraft noise
in Master Plans and runway
MDPs are not exceeding what was originally reported and approved by the
Federal government and comply with any noise metric system established to
minimise harm to human health.
2.2 Land Use Planning
The Victorian Government introduced the Melbourne Airport Environments Overlay
(MAEO) planning controls in 2008 to identify properties impacted by noise due to
flight paths. The MAEO limits dwelling density and requires construction to accord
with the Australian Standards relating to Aircraft Noise Intrusion. De
spite this
provision, there are some flaws in the current system.
The MAEO is subject to change and can
contract or expand depending on the
development plans of an airport. This means that there are areas that have been
developed without the consideration of the current MAEO in place. In the case of
Melbourne Airport
’
s proposed third runway, the expansion of the ANEF 20 will likely
result in further future expansion of the MAEO and apply to dwellings that have
already been constructed without noise attenuation, and without any compensation
identified for property owners.
Previous efforts by Airservices, the Melbourne Airport Environs Safeguarding
Standing Committee (MAESSAC) and the Victorian Government to create and
incorporate the National Airport Safeguarding Framework (NASF) Guidelines in the
planning scheme, is acknowledged. The effectiveness of the NASF Guidelines
however, while incorporated into the planning scheme, is limited.
The responsibility of assessing and regulation of the NASF Guidelines have been
largely transferred to Council planning officers, resulting in resource and financial
implications to councils. In 2023 Council
’
s records show 112 applications were
received for properties located within the ANEF 20 or ANEF 25 and this figure does
not include any pre-application meetings or verbal advice sought. The level of detail,
knowledge and attention required to assess this control has resource implications for
Council, particularly as the MAEO continues
to expand and application numbers
increase.
While there are references to NASF in the Planning Scheme, it is not incorporated in
the
section of the Scheme that outlines what Council officers consider when
assessing an application, particularly in relation to third party appeal rights involving
the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). On this basis the current
provisions
in the planning scheme do not provide sufficient guidance in relation to
the NASF.
Council submits that State and Territory
governments need to incorporate timely and
improved guidance within planning schemes to better inform land use and
development directives from the NASF and changes to Master Plans and MDPs.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
733 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
7
of
15
State and Territory governments could also develop an extra layer of information in
the planning information systems that are publically available so it is easily
accessible when landowners or potential landowners are conducting due diligence.
The Victorian Government has commenced a program of similar work however, it is
only
in the preliminary stages, with significant information still required.
Additional support should also be considered for councils impacted
by airports to
upskill and train their planners in the assessment and application of NASF to planning
applications. Over many years, Melbourne Airport has provided annual information
sessions
for planners on airport safeguarding. Council planners have regularly
attended
these sessions, which are seen as a valuable exercise that should continue
for all airports. There still remains a further need for specialist knowledge and skills
development through greater
training for planners, and/or resourcing of independent
specialist advisors to support the assessment of
planning applications for complex
aviation matters.
Sometimes it may be appropriate that applications are referred to government
organisations that hold specific technical knowledge and skills like CASA, or
Airservices Australia (Airservices) as a determining referral authority. Greater
information is required about the type of applications that should be referred, and
consideration for changes to the legislative framework to support this change.
2.2.1 Council’s Proposal / Recommendations:
1. Provide localised information and guidance about the impacts of NASF on
areas surrounding airports and make reports available to local government
an
d planning proponents that inform and guide planning applications. This
could be achieved through the embedding of relevant NASF guidelines
within the planning scheme.
2. Invest in specialised training of planners, and or resourcing of independent
specialist advisors to support the assessment of planning applications for
complex aviation matters.
3. Review and examine the appropriateness of facilitating determining referral
authorities for statutory planning applications for aviation related government
au
thorities e.g. CASA and Airservices.
2.3 Handling of Aircraft Noise Complaints
Council and the Brimbank community have held long term
concerns about the aircraft
noise complaints system, with key conce
rns including:
The actual recording of aircraft noise complaints by Airservices is issues
based which means that the volume of calls received about the same issue is
not reported, even though they may relate to different incidents.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
734 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
8
of
15
If a resident rings multiple times about the same issue, despite the incident
occurring at different times, the issue only gets recorded once, and they
may then
be treated as a ‘serial’ complainer and case managed, even though their issue may
not be resolved.
The complaints response system is heavily weighted toward supporting the
aviation sector, and doesn’t consider the health and wellbeing of residents
impacted by aircraft noise.
Residents who make multiple complaints for different incidents that relate to an
already reported issue may not have their complaint registered. This means that the
number of complaints being recorded is not reflective of the number being received
and skews the data.
Further analysis and transparent criteria are required to establish:
What constitutes a ‘new’ complaint, and how multiple complaints about the
same issue but relating to separate issues are transparently recorded and
appropriately shared with stakeholders
The criteria for noise complaints to be considered resolved
How the information is relayed back to the complainant, and opportunities for
escalation
Performance monitoring standards for the customer service provided by
Airservices to complainants
Appropriate standards of reporting to stakeholders.
Council also identifies the need
for greater transparency about the consequences for
airlines when a complaint results in compliance action. Currently very little
information is known about the implications for airlines when they breach regulations
and if
penalties apply. This type of information is considered important in terms of
Airservices providing a full response and closing the loop, not only with the customer,
but also with other community stakeholders like councils and
the Community Aviation
Consultation Group (CACG).
2.3.1 Council’s Proposal / Recommendations:
1. Commission an independent review of Airservices and the noise complaints and
information service handling procedures and practices.
a. Assess the independence of current aviation noise management systems
and processes, including the potential for the current system
to be
prejudiced toward outcomes that benefit the aviation sector over community
impacts.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
735 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
9
of
15
2.4 Amelioration Programs
Aircraft noise can have significant impacts on the health and wellbeing of impacted
communities, particularly where suburbs have developed without attenuation. Greater
regard is required for mitigation, and or compensation measures as part of airport
planning. Ongoing noise monitoring is also required to determine if aircraft noise is in
line with forecasted noise during the planning stage to inform further noise abatement
and mitigation.
A good example
of how airport planning can be mismanaged is the case of Brisbane
Airport. Since the opening of a parallel runway in July 2020, complaints have soared
from Brisbane residents about aircraft noise. As a result, Brisbane Airport has been
the subject of multiple reviews which may result in changes to flight paths. This
suggests
that the original noise assessments undertaken for current flight paths
underestimated the impact of aircraft noise, further emphasising the inadequacies of
the current noise system and measures.
Mitigation measures can be separated into active and passive noise abatement
measures,
where active measures relate to internal changes of flight paths, flight
times, and aircraft models, and passive measures are more community-focused
measures.
Best practice international airports provide a range of noise mitigation measures
including funded noise insulation schemes, compulsory acquisition, a curfew, and
noise abatement procedures. European examples provide a framework for best
practice measures to provide good passive noise abatement programs that assist
pre-e
xisting homes to mitigate noise impacts on residents. Examples are
available from Heathrow and Frankfurt regarding retro fitting sound insulation
treatments.
A national compensation scheme is required to fund the installation of noise
mitigation measures that reduce the impact of adverse aircraft noise on
the
affected communities by insulating dwellings and buildings accommodating
sensitive land usesor by other forms of compensation, as necessary.
Council has demonstrated through its HRA that a noise insulation program is required
in areas within the ANEF 20 and ANEF 25 contours for residential premises, schools,
childcare and early learning centres, aged care facilities and public buildings such as
libraries and community centres.
In addition to
being a requirement under the Aircraft Noise Levy Act 1995, a
compensation scheme will provide:
fairness and equity – accounts for an unfair distribution of adverse aircraft noise
on affected communities;
responsibility – the airport accepts accountability for the adverse aircraft noise
outcomes
proportionality and reasonableness – the compensation scheme is structured in a
balanced,
reasonable and commensurate manner;
consistency – rules and standards are fairly and consistently implemented;
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
736 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
10
of
15
transparency – the mitigation of adverse aircraft noise is minimised in a simple,
effective and user friendly way;
accountability – decisions can be justified under public scrutiny; and
agility – allows affected communities to anticipate and adapt to anticipated
change.
In June 2023, the National General Assembly of the Australian Local Government
Association (ALGA) endorsed a motion submitted by Brimbank City Council that ALGA
advocate for the Australian Government to establish a compensation scheme for
airport-impacted communities.
In the past, compensation schemes have been established to support households
affected by new airport runways. These include a compensation scheme in 1994 when
Sydney Airport’s third runway was built, and, more recently, a compensation scheme
for a new airport in Sydney’s Badgerys Creek in recognition to the change in noise
levels and lifestyles. A compensation scheme was also developed for residential and
public buildings surrounding Adelaide Airport in the early 2000s.
Compensation should also be considered for properties within Public Safety Areas
(PSA). PSA’s are designated areas of land at the end of airport runways where
planning restrictions may apply. The PSA comprises two areas, the 1:10,000 inner
area where the risk of being killed by an aircraft is one in 10,000 per year and an
outer area, where the risk decreases to one in 100,000 per year. The incompatible
uses within nominated PSA’s for both the inner and outer PSA include dwelling
houses,
multiple dwellings, tourist parks, hostels, residential care facilities and
retirement villages.
Within the Brimbank context, many local residential buildings were not built to
accommodate the acoustic demands of Melbourne Airport and its expansion. This is in
part due to settlements in Keilor establishing as early as 1850s, including
nonresidential buildings like the Keilor Primary School, which was constructed before
Melbourne Airport was commissioned. Another issue is that the ANEF can expand and
retract depending on the operation of the airport. In the case of Melbourne Airport, it
is currently proposed to apply to a much larger north south area to accommodate the
development of the third runway but retract in the east south orientation due to less
use. The change doesn’t result in any compensation for those people that have
already built homes and complied with the regulations that were current at the time
they constructed.
As mentioned earlier in relation to the Western Sydney Airport Draft EIS, DITRDCA
has developed a draft Noise Insulation and Property
Acquisition (NIPA) policy in
relation to aircraft overflight noise for buildings outside the Sydney Airport Site. The
NIPA policy details the eligibility requirements for inclusion and is based on the
aircraft noise results from this assessment and provides that this includes
Treatments for Residential & Non-Residential buildings within ANEC 20 (Australian
noise exposure concept), with an internal noise objective (i.e. bedrooms/living
spaces/other of 50 dBA.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
737 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
11
of
15
Council’s 2022 Submission identified that Melbourne Airport’s Master Plan and MDP
would have an unreasonable and unacceptable impact on the health and wellbeing
of community, mostly due to aircraft noise. The 2022 ANEF 25
contour outlined in
the Master Plan and MDP impacts areas of Keilor, Keilor Park and Keilor North in
Brimbank, while the ANEF 20 contour extends as far south as Sunshine North and
covers
the suburbs of Keilor, Keilor Park and Kealba. Importantly, many of these
dwellings were constructed without noise attenuation as it was not a requirement in
the planning scheme.
The Federal Government’s 2023 Aviation Green Paper acknowledges, “Planning for
Melbourne Airport has foreshadowed a four-runway system since the 1960s, with
this arrangement contained in development plans since the Melbourne Airport
Strategy of 1990.”
(p. 103, Aviation Green Paper – Towards 2050, 2023)
. Despite
this,
the Victorian Government only updated planning controls (MAEO) from the
ANEF 2003 to the ANEF 2018 in 2021. There is not timeline provided as to when the
2022 ANEF will be incorporated into the Planning Scheme. This means areas that
areas that will be impacted by future flight paths don’t have any requirements in
the Planning Scheme to noise attenuate.
Council submits that the Federal Government must develop a noise compensation
scheme for airport impacted communities, including Brimbank, to address the
negative impacts of living near an airport. It appears that while this approach is
being
undertaken for Western Sydney Airport it is not being instigated elsewhere,
suggesting there is an inconsistent regard to airport planning and community health
and wellbeing.
The lack of appropriate regard
for the health and wellbeing of communities that meets
international and best practice standards means that more and more communities will
be impacted by aircraft noise and other off site impacts as airports expand, which is
likely to increase complaints, and heightens the need to address and improve airport
planning now.
2.4.1 Council’s Proposal / Recommendations:
1. Establish a legislative framework that requires airports to implement noise
mitigation measures based on international best practice including:
a. A noise insulation program in the areas within the ANEF 20 and ANEF 25
contours for residential premises, schools, childcare and early learning
centr
es, aged care facilities and public buildings such as libraries and
community centres.
b. Requirements for noise abatement procedures that appropriately share
aircraft noise and provide reasonable respite to communities surrounding
airports and imposes
penalties when breached.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
738 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
12
of
15
2. Require airports including individual leased Federal airports to identify noise
mitigation measures to adequately address noise exceedances beyond WHO
Noise Guidelines, including options for a Federal funded noise insulation
program, a noise curfew, voluntary property acquisition or other compensation
measures,
especially for houses and other buildings within the vicinity of
airports prior to their construction, expa
nsion or commission.
3. Establish a policy framework that outlines a compensation scheme for airport
impacted communities. This should be provided either by means of a noise
amelioration program to owners of dwellings and buildings accommodating
sensitive land uses (i.e. schools, places of worship, childcare centres and
hospitals) adversely affected by aircraft noise. Such a compensation scheme
aligns with the legislated requirement under the Aircraft Noise Levy Act 1995
which aims to recover the costs incurred in providing noise amelioration
programs to
airport-impacted communities.
2.5. Community Engagement and Community Aviation Consultation Groups
(CACGs)
Council’s Submission to the White Paper Terms of Reference expressed concern over
the lack of transparency in relation to the assessment and approval of
Airport Master
Plans and Major Development Plans. This included how airports responded to public
submissions as a result of the public exhibition of an airport and making public how
this feedback informs changes to an Airport Master Plan or Runway Major
Development Plan.
Importantly, Council would like airports to make their Airport
Master Plans and Runway Major Development Plan public when they submit them to
the Federal Government for approval, so to improve
transparency.
Victorian planning scheme amendment legislation may provide the Federal
gove
rnment withguidance on how consultation could be more transparent and
better targeted. For major planning projects in Victoria, the Minister for Planning
can appoint expert advisory committees to hold public hearings to consider
significant proposals and allow stakeholders to present submissions to an
independe
nt panel of experts for consideration, who then make independent
recommendations to the government, bef
ore a decision is made. The process also
requires that all documentation about aproposal is made public, with the
opportunity for peer review.
In Queensland, community forums are appointed to review
documentation to allow for
a peer review and advice. This approach not only assists in informing the community,
it also delivers a more transparent review process.
The CACG that operates for Melbourne Airport now incorporates the Noise Abatement
Committees (NACs), which was merged to streamline the number of committees that
operate. The CACG including the NAC are very important for community and councils
to
gain information about noise and noise complaints, which is not otherwise
available. Ideally, information about noise complaints and ongoing reporting
made to
the CACG would be made public by Airservices on their website as well.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
739 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
13
of
15
Transparency of information is also important for data gathering and once noise
metric standards have been established, Council submits that it is important that
there
is a complementary system of communication for current and future
residents. Council concedes that aircraft noise cannot be eliminated and it is
important that the community understands how the Federal Government assesses
and monitors noise to ensure it is not causing unacceptable
harm.
Forms of communication should cater for cultural and linguistically diverse (CALD)
communities, as well as those disadvantaged such as communities that may not
have direct access to the internet. Brimbank has a diverse
community with 57.3%
of residents who speaking another language other than English at home and 13.6%
who
do not speak English well
or at all (Brimbank Profile ID 2021). In 2016, over
16% of Brimbank households did not have internet connection (which is more than
5% higher than the Greater Melbourne Average), limiting access to information.
An
y information provided to the community should be easy to understand and
assist the community in making more informed decisions.
2.5.1 Council’s Proposal / Recommendations:
1. Establish an independent and expert advisory committee, or similar, to provide
a transparent, independent and public review process that enables impacted
stakeholders to present their submissions for independent consideration, and
whi
ch can make recommendations to the Government about an airport master
plan and major development plan.
2. Require Federal and State government referrals, assessments and decisions
fo
r airport master plans and major development plans to be made public,
including any peer reviews commissioned.
3. Require airports to publically release their assessment of submissions received
about Master Plans and Major Development Plans, and specify how these
changes in response to submissions made. This should be made public when
airpor
ts submit their final draft Master Plan or major development plan to the
Government for approval.
4. Require airports to make public their final draft master plan or major
development plan, when they submit it to the Government for approval to
promote transparency about the process.
5. Require Federal and State government referrals, assessments and decisions
for airport master plans and major development plans to be made public,
including any peer reviews commissioned.
6. Establish Guidelines that require airports and authorities that engage with the
public to provide noise information and communications that responds to the
socio-demographic characteristics of impacted communities. This is to include
multiple sources
of information that can be accessed by community and multi
translated
as appropriate to the respective CALD communities impacted.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
740 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
14
of
15
2.6 Emerging Technology
The emergence of ‘new’ technologies, such as electric batteries and Advanced Air
Mobility (AAM) technology, can have significant benefits to the community. Council
is
generally supportive of new technologies and innovation particularly where they
increase
employment and economic output in a sustainable manner. Notwithstanding,
sometimes the legislative framework is insufficiently developed to respond to the
pace of change. Council flags the need for the
Federal Government to continue to
manage and monitor the environmental impacts of new technologies and ensure the
assessment process in terms of the community impacts are managed in accordance
with the aforementioned recommendations.
Council has already raised concerns regarding insufficiencies in the aviation planning
fr
amework including inadequate protection of the community from unacceptable
aircraft noise and the lack of transparency around aviation planning and decision
making.
These and other concerns raised should inform how new technology is
assessed in terms of its potential impacts on the community also. For example:
How are noise levels of new technologies considered?
What is the regulatory framework and will penalties or restrictions apply?
How does NASF apply to new technology?
While Council anticipates that advanced technology should contribute to greater
sustainability and quieter aircraft, both concepts are not synonymous with each
other.
Council submits that a greater focus on the health and wellbeing (as is
associated with noise given the parameters of this inquiry) should be a focus when
facilitating and investing in new technology.
2.6.1 Council Position / Recommendations:
1. Council generally supports new technologies and innovation where they
contribute to sustainability, increases employment and economic output and
doesn
’t have detrimental consequences for the health and wellbeing of
community.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
741 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
15
of
15
3.Council Position / Recommendations
1. Undertake an independent and expert review of ANEF and Noise Contour
systems to assess the impact of
aircraft noise on human health and wellbeing
against the WHO Noise Guidelines to inform the establishment of
a noise metric
system that minimises harm to human health.
2. Establish and integrate a noise metric system that incorporates health and
safety considerations and embed
it in the regulatory framework for airport
planning (e.g. Airports Act), and require it to be used to protect community
from aircraft noise impacts.
3. Introduce changes to legislation that require airports to prepare a well-founded
Health
Impact Assessment (HIA) in relation to the off-site noise impacts
associated with Master Plans and runway MDPs that accord with the WHO Noise
that accord with the WHO Noise Guidelines. All HIAs prepared should then be
subject to an independent and expert peer review to ensure its veracity. Peer
review reports are then to be made available for public review
as part of the
statutory consultation for Master Plans and runway MDPs.
4. Support and fund an appropriate network of EMUs for the purpose of
measuring aircraft noise to ensure that forecast aircraft noise in Master Plans
and runway MDPs are not exceeding what was originally reported and
approved by the Federal government and comply with any noise metric
system established to minimise harm to human hea
lth.
5. Provide localised information and guidance about the impacts of NASF on
areas surrounding airports and make reports available to local government
and planning proponents that inform and guide planning applications. This
should
be achieved through the embedding of NASF guidelines within the
planning scheme.
6. Invest in specialised training of planners, and or resourcing of independent
specialist advisors to support the assessment of planning applications for
complex aviation matters.
7. Review and examine the appropriateness of facilitating determining referral
authorities for statutory planning applications for aviation related government
au
thorities e.g. CASA
and Airservices.
8. Commission an independent review of Airservices and the noise complaints
and information service handling procedures and practices.
a. Assess the independence of current aviation noise management systems
and processes, including the potential for the current system
to be
prejudiced toward outcomes that benefit the aviation sector over community
impacts.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
742 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
16
of
15
9. Establish a legislative framework that requires airports to implement noise
mitigation measures based on international best practice including:
a. A noise insulation program in the areas within the ANEF 20 and ANEF 25
contours for residential premises, schools, childcare and early learning
centr
es, aged care facilities and public buildings such as libraries and
community centres.
b. Requirements for noise abatement procedures that appropriately share
aircraft noise and provide reasonable respite to communities surrounding
airports and imposes penalties when breached.
10. Require airports including individual leased Federal airports to identify noise
mitigation measures to adequately address noise exceedances beyond WHO
Noise Guidelines, including options for a Federal funded noise insulation
program, a noise curfew, voluntary property acquisition or other
compensation measures, especially for houses and other buildings within the
vicinity of airports prior to their construction, expansion or commission.
11. Establish a policy framework that outlines a compensation scheme for airport
impacted communities. This should be provided either by means of a noise
amelioration program to owners of dwellings and buildings accommodating
sensitive land uses (i.e. schools, places of worship, childcare centers and
hospitals) adversely affected by aircraft noise. Such a compensation scheme
aligns with the legislated requirement under the Aircraft Noise Levy Act 1995
which aims to recover the costs incurred in providing noise amelioration
programs to airport-impacted communities.
12. Establish an independent and expert advisory committee, or similar, to
provide a transparent, independent and public review process that enables
impacted stakeholders to present their submissions for independent
considera
tion, and which can make recommendations to the Government
about an airport master plan and major development plan.
13. Require Federal and State government referrals, assessments and decisions
fo
r airport master plans and major development plans to be made public,
incl
uding any peer reviews commissioned.
14. Require airports to publically release their assessment of submissions received
about Master Plans and Major Development Plans, and specify how these
changes in response to submissions made. This should be made public when
airpor
ts submit their final
draft Master Plan or major development plan to the
Government for approval.
15. Require airports to make public their final draft master plan or major
development plan, when they submit it to the Government for approval to
prom
ote transparency about the process.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
743 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
17
of
15
16. Require Federal and State government referrals, assessments and decisions
for airport master plans and major development plans to be made public,
incl
uding any peer reviews commissioned.
17. Establish Guidelines that require airports and authorities that engage with the
public to provide noise information and communications that responds to the
socio-demographic characteristics of impacted communities. This is to include
multiple sources of information that can be accessed by community and
multi-translated as appropriate to the respective CALD community impacted.
18. Council supports new technologies and innovation where it increases
employment and economic output and doesn’t have detrimental consequences
for the health and wellbeing of community.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
744 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Brimbank City Council - Submission to Inquiry on Impact and Mitigation of Airport Noise (April 2024)
Page
18
of
15
4. Attachment: Tonkin & Taylor Health Risk Assessment for
Melbourne Airport Master Plan
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
745 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
REPORT
Melbourne Airport
Expansion Noise Health Risk
Assessment
Prepared for
Brimbank City Council
Prepared by
Tonkin & Taylor Pty Ltd
Date
April 2022
Job Number
1019669
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
746 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Document Control
Title: Melbourne Airport Expansion Noise Health Risk Assessment
Date
Version Description
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Authorised
by:
15.04.2022 V1 Draft
Dr Lyn
Denison,
Matthew
DiGiovine
Jenny
Simpson
Jenny Simpson
21.04.2022
Final
Dr Lyn
Denison,
Matthew
DiGiovine
Jenny
Simpson
Jenny Simpson
Distribution:
Brimbank City Council
1 electronic copy
Tonkin & Taylor Pty Ltd (FILE)
1 electronic copy
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
747 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Tonkin & Taylor Pty Ltd
Melbourne Airport Expansion Noise Health Risk Assessment
Brimbank City Council
April 2022
Job No: 1019669
Table of contents
Executive summary
iv
1 Introduction
1
1.1 Environment Protection Act (2017) as amended (2018) and Subordinate Legislation in
Victoria
1
2 Structure of Report
3
3 Stakeholder Engagement
4
3.1 Focus Groups
4
3.2 Key Issues
4
4 Health Risk Assessment Noise
6
4.1 Introduction
6
4.2 Methodology
6
4.3 Population Profile
6
4.3.1 Population and Health Profile
6
4.3.2 Population Profile
7
4.4 Health Risk Assessment
10
4.4.1 Issues Identification
10
4.4.2 Hazard Assessment
10
4.4.3 Exposure Assessment
18
4.4.4 Risk Characterisation
21
5 Risk Mitigation
26
5.1 Passive noise abatement
26
5.1.1 Best Practice
26
5.1.2 Previous Australian examples of insulation programs
27
6 Conclusions and Recommendations
29
7 Review of Air Quality Report
31
8 References
34
9 Applicability
39
Appendix A :
Marshall Day Report
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
748 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Tonkin & Taylor Pty Ltd
Melbourne Airport Expansion Noise Health Risk Assessment
Brimbank City Council
April 2022
Job No: 1019669
Executive summary
Tonkin and Taylor Pty Ltd (T+T) has been engaged by Brimbank City Council to undertake a health
risk assessment (HRA) for noise from the proposed expansion
of the Melbourne Airport including a
new North-South runway. The draft noise contours included as part of the 2022 Melbourne Airport
Master Plan extend over
large parts of the Brimbank Local Government area (LGA). In addition to
undertaking the HRA, T+T were also engaged to undertake limited stakeholder engagement to gain
an understanding of the current impacts of noise from the airport operations and concerns about
the proposed expansion and to undertake a review of
the air quality assessment that has been
undertaken as part of
the development of Master Plan and the predicted impacts on the Brimbank
LGA.
The outcomes of the stakeholder engagement show
that the residents in parts of Keilor, Keilor Park,
Keilor Village and Kealba are
adversely impacted by the current operations of the Melbourne
Airport. Noise from aircraft take-offs and landings is causing sleep disturbance and increased levels
of stress and anxiety in the impacted community. People are unable to enjoy their homes and
cannot utilise their outdoor areas. This impact is predicted to worsen and affect more people in the
Brimbank LGA with the proposed airport expansion. The community feel that their concerns have
been dismissed by the Melbourne Airport Corporation
and are feeling frustrated and helpless. This
is having a significant impact on the health and wellbeing of the impacted community.
The results of the HRA have shown that the proposed airport expansion will lead to significant
increases in the percentage of the population that are highly annoyed by aircraft noise. It has also
shown that there will be a significant increase in sleep disturbance in the exposed community which
may lead to increases in health effects such as cardiovascular disease and anxiety and depression.
The WHO (2018) guidelines are exceeded across the areas within the ANEF 20 and ANEF 25 contours
indicating that there is an increased
risk of adverse health effects within the exposed population.
A review of the baseline
health profile and socioeconomic indicators for the Brimbank LGA show
that the suburbs within the ANEF 20 and ANEF 25 contours are a vulnerable population to the
impacts of aircraft noise. They have a lower socioeconomic status that Australia and Victoria as a
whole which is
a known risk factor for the adverse effects of aircraft noise. The proportion of
children assessed as being developmentally on
track in the language and cognitive skills is notably
lower in Brimbank (79.3%) than in Greater Melbourne (85.3%). Aircraft noise has been shown in
epidemiological studies to impact on children’s cognitive development particularly in reading and
oral comprehension. There are also higher rates of deaths from ischaemic heart and cardiovascular
disease in Brimbank compared to the
rest of Victoria. All these health outcomes can be exacerbated
by exposure to aircraft noise.
School children who live and go to school within the ANEF 20 and ANEF 25 contours are predicted to
experience a delay in
reading and oral comprehension of between 3 and 5 months compared to
children in lower noise areas. These effects are due to direct impacts during the day as well as
impacts due to sleep disturbance which may occur outside the normal night hours of 11pm to 6am.
Exposure during critical
periods of learning at school could potentially impair development and have
a lifelong effect on educational attainment. This impact is predicted to occur within a population
that is known to be delayed in their language and cognitive skills compared to the rest of Melbourne.
Given the potential adverse effects due to the increase in aircraft noise, mitigation measures should
be implemented to minimise the risk to the exposed community.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
749 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1
Tonkin & Taylor Pty Ltd
Melbourne Airport Expansion Noise Health Risk Assessment
Brimbank City Council
April 2022
Job No: 1019669
1
1
Introduction
Tonkin and Taylor Pty Ltd (T+T) has been engaged by Brimbank City Council to undertake a health
risk assessment (HRA) for noise from the proposed expansion
of the Melbourne Airport including a
new North-South runway. The draft noise contours included as part of the 2022 Melbourne Airport
Master Plan extend over large parts of the Brimbank Local Government area (LGA). In addition to
undertaking
the HRA, T+T were also engaged to undertake limited stakeholder engagement to gain
an understanding of the current impacts of noise from the airport operations and concerns about
the proposed expansion and to undertake a review of the air quality assessment that has been
undertaken as part of
the development of Master Plan and the predicted impacts on the Brimbank
LGA.
This report presents the outcomes of
the stakeholder engagement as well as the results of the HRA
for aircraft noise. The HRA has been conducted using the most recent WHO Noise Guidelines (2018).
It also presents a review of
national and international approaches to mitigating the impacts of noise
from
airport operations on local communities. The outcomes of the review of the air quality
assessment against the requirements of the Environment Protection Act (2018) and the new
environmental legislation
in Victoria is also presented.
1.1
Environment Protection Act (2017) as amended (2018) and Subordinate
Legislation in Victoria
The Environment Protection Act 2017 (the Act), and subordinate legislation came
into effect on 1
July 2021 and is designed to drive environmental improvements by ensuring that individual
industries take responsibility for the risks they pose to human health and the environment. At the
centre of the Act is the General Environmental Duty (GED). This requires all duty holders
(businesses, industries, community etc) to understand, abate and manage their emissions so that
risks of harm to the environment and to human health are minimised. Co
mplying with the GED
means taking proactive steps as well as employing industry best practices to minimise risk to human
health and the environment,
so far as reasonably practicable.
The GED requires anyone engaging in any activities that may give rise to risks of harm to human
health or the environment from pollution or waste
to minimise those risks, so far as reasonably
practicable. This requires such risks to either be eliminated, or if it is not reasonably practicable to
eliminate such risks, to be reduced so far as reasonably practicable.
In determining whether it is reasonably practicable to minimise risks of harm to human health and
the environment, the following matters are relevant:
The likelihood of the risk eventuating.
The degree of harm that would result if the risk eventuated.
What the person knows, or ought reasonably to know about the harm or risks of harm and
any ways of eliminating or reducing those risks.
The availability and suitability of ways to eliminate or reduce the risk.
The cost of eliminating or reducing the risk.
The GED requires the duty holder to reduce the risk of harm to human health and the environment
from
pollution and waste. Noise comes under the category of pollution, and it includes vibration. As
far as reasonably practicable, if the duty holder’s activity involves noise it’s their duty to reduce the
levels of risk. Businesses must not cause unreasonable noise or aggravated
noise. They must make
sure that any noise from their activities or premises doesn’t unreasonably impact the local
community.
Brimbank Council Meeting No. 632 16 April 2024
750 of 891
Attachment 12.8.1